Free
- Credits1,200 / 6,000/yr
- Min seats1
- 100 credits/month + 500 actions/month
- Access to 150+ data partners
- Up to 200 rows per table
- No card required
Pricing analysis Clay is one of the most talked-about B2B data enrichment platforms right now. But between the credit-based pricing, a separate actions meter, price selectors that raise the "starts at" figure, and the required tool stack, figuring out what Clay actually costs your team is anything but simple.
Plans
Clay ships 4 tiers. Per-seat pricing combined with a credit system for data lookups - the listed price is rarely the real cost.
Clay pricing tiers - verified October 2026 against the vendor's own pricing page:
| Plan | Price | Best for | Limits / Inclusions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Evaluation / testing | 100 credits + 500 actions · 100 credits/month + 500 actions/month · Access to 150+ data partners |
| Launch | $185+/mo monthly ($167+/mo billed annually) | 2,500+ credits/mo + 15,000 actions/mo | 2,500+ credits + 15K actions · Entry paid plan: 'starts at' price, selectors expand it · Phone enrichment and job-change signals |
| Growth | $495+/mo monthly ($446+/mo billed annually) | 6,000+ credits/mo + 40,000 actions/mo | 6,000+ credits + 40K actions · Auto-sync & enrich CRM · HTTP API integration + webhook automation |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom credit + action pools | 100K+ credits and 200K+ actions per month · Custom pricing with annual commitment |
Credits
Clay bills actions in credits with non-equal costs. A 5,000-credit plan does NOT mean 5,000 lookups.
Clay credits are the platform’s internal currency. Every action you run - a data lookup, an AI enrichment, a workflow step - consumes credits or actions from your monthly allocation.
The tricky part: credit consumption varies significantly depending on the data provider and the type of information you’re requesting. Clay aggregates 150+ data partners (per its pricing page), so the cost per action is highly variable.
Rough consumption benchmarks per action:
| Action | Credits consumed |
|---|---|
| Basic contact enrichment (name, title, company) | 1–3 credits |
| Email lookup (single provider) | 1–2 credits |
| LinkedIn profile enrichment | 1 credit |
| Mobile number lookup | 2–13 credits (provider-dependent) |
| AI/Claygent step | Variable |
| Data cleaning and formatting | Free |
The more expensive operations - mobile numbers in particular - can quickly use up a Launch allocation. A single mobile lookup can cost up to 13 credits depending on the provider, and the vendor says Data Credits start at $0.05 each.
On Launch and Growth, unused credits can accumulate, but only up to 2x your monthly allocation. Anything beyond that cap is lost.
For teams with seasonal prospecting cycles - heavy in Q1 and Q3, quiet in Q2 and Q4 - this cap can create waste. Credits accumulated during slow months aren’t all available when a big campaign launches.
This is one area where the contrast with tools like Derrick is sharpest: Derrick credits never expire while you stay on a paid plan, regardless of usage patterns.
Compare
How Clay stacks against Derrick, Hunter, and the other tools we benchmarked.
Both tools offer B2B data enrichment with a credit-based model. Here’s a direct comparison on the metrics that matter most for budget decisions (Clay prices are in USD, Derrick prices in EUR):
| Clay Launch | Clay Growth | Derrick Standard | Derrick Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credits/month | 2,500 (+ 15K actions) | 6,000 (+ 40K actions) | 10,000 | 25,000 |
| Price/month | $185 monthly / $167 annual | $495 monthly / $446 annual | €20 | €47.50 |
| Cost/credit | Data Credits from $0.05 | Data Credits from $0.05 | €0.002 | €0.0019 |
| Credit rollover | Up to 2x | Up to 2x | ✓ Credits never expire on a paid plan | ✓ Credits never expire on a paid plan |
| CRM integration | ✕ | ✓ | Via Zapier/Make | Via Zapier/Make |
| Web app + Google Sheets | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator required | Often | Often | ✕ | ✕ |
Important nuance on credit consumption: Derrick and Clay don’t use credits at the same rate per action. Some Derrick enrichments (notably phone finder) consume significantly more credits than Clay’s equivalent. The comparison below reflects per-action costs:
| Action | Clay (Data Credits from $0.05) | Derrick Standard | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn profile enrichment | 1 credit | €0.002 (1 credit) | Derrick |
| Email finder | 1–2 credits | €0.01 (5 credits) | Derrick |
| Phone finder | 2–13 credits (provider-dependent) | €0.40 (200 credits) | Clay (at the low end of its range) |
For LinkedIn enrichment and email finding - the core workflow for most SDR teams - Derrick’s per-action cost is much lower. Phone number lookup is the exception where Clay can have an advantage.
A sales team enriching 5,000 profiles monthly, pulling email addresses for each:
Clay:
Derrick (Pro, €175/month):
On this workflow, Derrick Pro costs €175/month against a Clay entry price of $495/month before extra credits, with no LinkedIn Sales Navigator requirement and no CRM export friction (Derrick is a web app with nothing to install, also in Google Sheets).
To get started with data enrichment in Google Sheets, Derrick’s approach removes the export step entirely - enriched data lands in the web app or directly in the spreadsheet your team already uses.
What's included
Features bundled into Clay's plans - synthesised from the vendor's pricing page and documentation :
Not every feature ships in every tier - confirm against the plan card above before you commit.
The verdict
Clay is a genuinely powerful platform for GTM teams that need flexible, multi-provider enrichment with workflow automation. For organizations with a dedicated RevOps function, mature prospecting processes, and a budget from $446/month, the Growth plan delivers strong value.
The challenge is the entry point. At $167/month (annual billing) or $185/month (monthly), the Launch plan offers limited monthly volume (2,500 data credits) and no CRM sync, which is listed under Growth. Because the listed prices are “starts at” prices, real workflows in production tend to cost more than the entry figure.
If your team is earlier stage, budget-conscious, or simply doesn’t need Clay’s full workflow builder, there are leaner paths to quality B2B data enrichment with less operational overhead.
derrick •
Install the add-on and enrich your lists without leaving your spreadsheet.
Install in Google Sheets →https://app1.derrick-app.com/mcp Call the same enrichment endpoints straight from your own stack or workflow.
Read the API docs →No credit card · No contract
Switch to Derrick
Derrick is a web app: nothing to install, no credit card, 100 free credits every month.
Sign up on the Derrick web app. Nothing to install, no credit card required: you start with 100 free credits per month.
Upload the CSV you exported from Clay, paste LinkedIn URLs, or import from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. The same actions also run in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API.
Pick the column to enrich and the data you need: emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack. Derrick fills the columns, and the email and phone finders only charge for what they find.
Clay has unlimited seats, so there is no per-seat fee. Budget a Launch plan ($167/mo billed annually or $185/mo monthly) or a Growth plan ($446/mo annual or $495/mo monthly), plus LinkedIn Sales Navigator for each active user ($5,940/year for five users, a cost outside Clay), plus an outreach tool and any top-ups. These are "starts at" prices: the credit and action selectors raise them.
Yes. The free plan includes 100 data credits/month (1,200/year) and 500 actions/month, unlimited seats, up to 200 rows per table and access to 150+ data partners. It’s sufficient to test workflows and understand the interface, but not for consistent professional use.
On Launch and Growth, unused credits accumulate up to 2x your monthly allocation. Beyond that cap, excess credits are lost. This rollover policy can create waste for teams with variable monthly usage.
No. According to Clay’s pricing page, if an enrichment returns no result you’re not charged Data Credits or Actions. You do pay for lookups that return data, and workflow steps that run still count against your actions cap.
Clay is a standalone web platform combining 150+ data partners with workflow automation, with paid plans starting at $167/month (annual billing) or $185/month (monthly). Derrick runs in its web app, inside Google Sheets (sidebar), through an MCP server and a REST API, enriches LinkedIn profiles, finds emails and phones, and integrates with CRMs via Zapier/Make/n8n - starting at €20/month with credits that never expire on a paid plan. Clay has an edge on workflow complexity and mobile phone data; Derrick has an edge on price, ease of use, and LinkedIn/email enrichment cost per action.
Some workflows work without Sales Navigator, but many of Clay’s core LinkedIn enrichment features perform significantly better - or exclusively work - with an active Sales Navigator subscription. Budget for $99/month per user if LinkedIn is a primary source.
Keep exploring
Comparing options? These are the other email + phone finder tools we've torn down at the same depth - real per-credit cost, hidden fees, plan calculators.
RocketReach review: 3.6/5. 700M+ profile contact database with emails and phones, 5 free lookups then $33/mo (annual). Broad and cheap, high
See pricing →Breeze Intelligence review: 3.5/5. Clearbit's data inside HubSpot, from $45/mo for 100 credits plus a HubSpot plan. For HubSpot users, not g
See pricing →Clearbit review: 3.5/5. The standalone product is gone; its data now lives in HubSpot Breeze from $45/mo plus a HubSpot plan. Worth it only
See pricing →Skrapp review: 3.6/5. LinkedIn email finder with verified-only billing, free 50 credits/mo then $29/mo. For budget LinkedIn SDRs, email only
See pricing →Go further
Features, accuracy, integrations - everything beyond pricing.
Open the review → Top alternatives10 picks compared by use case : Google Sheets native, Sales Nav export, deliverability, enterprise.
See the ranking → Curated stackOur hand-picked shortlist across categories.
See the curation →