Lemlist
- Starting price: $63/seat/mo (annual)
- Free plan: No (14-day free trial)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: Paris, France
Updated
Lemlist vs Evaboot vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Lemlist vs Evaboot vs Derrick: Lemlist is a multichannel cold outreach (email + linkedin + calls), Evaboot is a sales navigator export, cleaning and email-enrichment chrome extension. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Lemlist or Evaboot) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Lemlist or Evaboot for outreach.
Lemlist is built for sequenced outreach across email + LinkedIn + (sometimes) calls. The hidden cost is enrichment: Lemlist bills you per contact AND per channel. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Lemlist's real cost-per-touched-prospect against Derrick's flat credit-pool model that decouples enrichment from sending.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 27 000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Lemlist vs Evaboot vs Derrick at a glance
Evaboot
- Starting price: $9/mo (100 credits)
- Free plan: Trial credits included on signup
- Founded: 2021
- HQ: Paris, France
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Lemlist and Evaboot
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Real-time validation and enrichment without data quality gaps
Derrick delivers real-time email validation and rich enrichment directly within Google Sheets, addressing the data gaps Lemlist and Evaboot often leave behind during outbound workflows. Unlike Lemlist, which focuses on outreach and may rely on external validation, Derrick provides instantaneous verification and 50+ enrichment attributes without leaving Sheets. By validating in real time and offering actionable, up-to-date data, Derrick improves deliverability and lead quality, reducing wasted outreach time by up to 5-10 hours per month. Use cases include immediate score-based routing and on-the-fly record cleansing during prospecting sessions.
02 Flexible 3,000+ integrations for seamless automation
Derrick tackles the 3,000+ integrations challenge that Lemlist and Evaboot struggle to keep seamless, by delivering native, 100% Google Sheets workflow with 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n without CSVExports or complex setup. Unlike Lemlist, which excels at multi-channel outreach but lacks broad, real-time integration depth, Derrick centralizes data flow directly in Sheets for instant automation. You gain measurable efficiency: up to 5-10 hours saved per month and scalable workflows across 3,000+ connectors. A practical use case: automatically enrich, validate, and qualify leads across apps in real time, with credits that carry over monthly. Derrick’s native approach ensures uninterrupted automation without the friction of external data silos.
03 Real-time, scalable lead qualification AI insights for every contact
Lemlist and Evaboot struggle with real-time, scalable lead qualification insights across every contact, often lacking unified AI scoring and immediate validation at scale. Derrick differentiates itself by embedding real-time AI lead scoring and summarization directly inside Google Sheets, leveraging 50+ enrichment attributes and Claude/ChatGPT for automatic segmentation. This enables measurable gains: faster qualification cycles and improved deliverability insights, reducing manual triage time by up to 30-50% in practice. With Derrick, you get scalable, contact-level AI insights that adapt as you grow, without leaving your Sheets workflow.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Lemlist, Evaboot, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Lemlist does better
- Best multichannel outreach UX
- Lemwarm = built-in deliverability
- Personalization at scale
What Evaboot does better
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- Cheapest entry in the category
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Lemlist | Evaboot | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | $63/seat/mo (annual) | $9/mo (100 credits) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€756/yr | ~€108/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | No (14-day free trial) | Trial credits included on signup | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Lemlist vs Evaboot vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Lemlist | Derrick App | Evaboot | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Multichannel Outreach derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder
Lemlist vs Evaboot vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Multichannel Outreach Lemlist
$63/seat/mo (annual)
Best for: Multichannel outbound teams
Lemlist offers scalable outbound pricing with a free tier and paid plans starting at accessible monthly rates, plus credits-based options for teams handling larger campaigns. For full details on features, limits, and enterprise options, see the complete pricing breakdown on the pricing page.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder Evaboot
$9/mo (100 credits)
Best for: SDRs scraping Sales Navigator at scale
Evaboot offers a no-code pricing structure with an accessible entry point and credits-based tiers; see the full pricing breakdown for all plan details, limits, and billing options. For complete pricing details, view the Evaboot Pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Lemlist to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Lemlist, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Lemlist if…
- You specifically need multichannel outbound teams
- Best multichannel outreach UX
- Lemwarm = built-in deliverability
- You're already invested in the Lemlist ecosystem
Pick Evaboot if…
- You specifically need sdrs scraping sales navigator at scale
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- You're already invested in the Evaboot ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Lemlist vs Evaboot
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Derrick vs Lemlist: which is better for multi-channel outreach?
+
Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach with native LinkedIn integration and AI-powered email personalization, making it ideal for teams prioritizing volume campaigns. However, it requires significant list preprocessing and external data validation tools to maintain quality at scale. Derrick complements this approach by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating manual exports while providing real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes. For teams wanting streamlined multi-channel campaigns without the complexity, Derrick's integrated AI scoring and rollover credits offer better cost efficiency and operational simplicity than Lemlist's steeper learning curve and data accuracy dependencies.
Is Derrick a strong alternative to Lemlist for growth teams?
+
Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Lemlist for growth teams, particularly those already working in Google Sheets. While Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach automation and email sequencing, Derrick offers native Sheets integration that eliminates CSV exports and manual data preprocessing-saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick's AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and fifty-plus contact attributes provide the data intelligence foundation that Lemlist requires external tools to achieve. For growth teams prioritizing data quality and operational efficiency over pure volume outreach, Derrick delivers faster prospecting workflows without the learning curve or supplementary enrichment costs that Lemlist demands.
Derrick vs Lemlist vs Evaboot: which offers better pricing?
+
Pricing comparison depends on your specific needs. Lemlist focuses on outreach automation with plans starting around entry-level costs but requiring supplementary data tools, increasing total spend. Evaboot offers lead scoring with competitive pricing but lacks comprehensive enrichment depth. Derrick delivers the most cost-effective solution for data enrichment directly in Google Sheets, starting free with rollover credits and no card required. Derrick eliminates expensive LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions, potentially saving over 1,200 annually while providing 50+ enrichment attributes and integrated AI scoring without external tools or complex setups.
How does Lemlist compare to Evaboot for data enrichment?
+
Lemlist focuses on multi-channel outreach and AI-powered personalization for campaigns, while Evaboot concentrates on data quality and lead scoring with easier, no-code workflows. For data enrichment specifically, Evaboot provides straightforward enrichment and validation but can be limited in depth and multi-source coverage. Lemlist, by contrast, relies more on its outreach features and often needs external enrichment tools for deeper prospect intelligence. Derrick complements both by offering 50+ enrichment attributes natively in Google Sheets, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring, all without CSV exports or complex setups, making it a stronger centralized enrichment and qualification layer for B2B teams, especially when you want seamless automation and extensive data reliability alongside outreach.
What’s the difference between Derrick and Evaboot for lead qualification?
+
Derrick focuses on AI-powered lead qualification directly within Google Sheets with real-time email validation and integrated Claude or ChatGPT scoring, while Evaboot operates as a standalone platform requiring CRM integration for qualification workflows. Derrick eliminates the need for external tools through native enrichment of 50+ attributes per contact, whereas Evaboot requires supplementary data sources for comprehensive prospect profiling. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility than Evaboot's scaling pricing model for teams managing variable qualification volumes.
Can Derrick replace both Lemlist and Evaboot in one stack?
+
Derrick cannot fully replace both Lemlist and Evaboot with a single stack for all use cases. Lemlist specializes in multi-channel outreach, AI-powered email personalization, and LinkedIn automation, which Derrick does not primarily target for campaign execution or sequence management. Evaboot focuses on lead scoring, data quality, and straightforward enrichment workflows, areas where Derrick adds value with native Google Sheets, AI-driven scoring, and extensive integration options, but not as a dedicated data enrichment engine. However, Derrick can complement both by enhancing prospect intelligence, validation, and workflow orchestration within a single, no-code stack-saving time, reducing tool sprawl, and providing scalable enrichment and scoring, while relying on Lemlist or Evaboot for specific outbound campaigns or enrichment gaps when needed. In short, Derrick can replace some overlapping functions and streamline the stack, but for full parity you’d still rely on Lemlist for complex multi-channel outreach and Evaboot for advanced enrichment scenarios.
One-on-one
Lemlist vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Lemlist compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneEvaboot vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Evaboot compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
