Lemlist
- Starting price: $63/seat/mo (annual)
- Free plan: No (14-day free trial)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: Paris, France
Updated
Lemlist vs LinkFinder vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Lemlist vs LinkFinder vs Derrick: Lemlist is a multichannel cold outreach (email + linkedin + calls), LinkFinder is a ai-powered linkedin email finder with multi-source data aggregation and zero linkedin account dependency. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Lemlist or LinkFinder) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Lemlist or LinkFinder for outreach.
Lemlist is built for sequenced outreach across email + LinkedIn + (sometimes) calls. The hidden cost is enrichment: Lemlist bills you per contact AND per channel. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Lemlist's real cost-per-touched-prospect against Derrick's flat credit-pool model that decouples enrichment from sending.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 27 000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Lemlist vs LinkFinder vs Derrick at a glance
LinkFinder
- Starting price: $49/month (Starter) · 25-credit free trial
- Free plan: No (paid plans only - credit-based pricing)
- Founded: 2024 (estimated)
- HQ: Not publicly disclosed
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Lemlist and LinkFinder
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Real-time validation and native Sheets enrichment without extra tools
Derrick eliminates the need for external validation tools by offering real-time email validation and native Sheets enrichment directly inside Google Sheets, unlike Lemlist, which relies on separate workflows for data quality, or LinkFinder, which processes data outside the spreadsheet canvas. While Lemlist focuses on outreach workflows and LinkFinder on bulk enrichment, Derrick keeps validation and enrichment seamless within Sheets, reducing tool-switching and data lag. This concrete integration saves 5-10 hours per month and delivers up-to-date, 50+ enriched attributes per contact without leaving the sheet. A quick use case: validate one click in Derrick as you build your prospect list, ensuring deliverability while enriching in-place.
02 Ultra-fast, in-spreadsheet enrichment with no data mismatch risk
Lemlist and LinkFinder offer bulk enrichment and external processing, but neither provides fully in-spreadsheet enrichment within Google Sheets with guaranteed data integrity. Derrick delivers ultra-fast, in-spreadsheet enrichment directly inside Sheets, eliminating the data-mismatch risk that arises when transferring between tools. By keeping enrichment native to Google Sheets and leveraging 50+ attributes per contact plus real-time validation, Derrick reduces rework and errors, saving hours monthly. A typical use case: enrich in-place as you build your outreach list, with credits tracked and re-useable within the same sheet.
03 Native workspace data quality and workflow cohesion integration
Lemlist and LinkFinder can propel data discovery, but they operate outside native workspace cohesion, forcing manual handoffs and separate environments rather than a single Google Sheet workflow. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and real-time data quality within the same sheet, eliminating repeated exports and tool-switching. Teams gain measurable efficiency: up to 5-10 hours saved per month and a smoother, consistent data quality across prospect lists, with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. Use cases like instant validation and automatic field normalization flow directly in Derrick, keeping workflow cohesion intact.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Lemlist, LinkFinder, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Lemlist does better
- Best multichannel outreach UX
- Lemwarm = built-in deliverability
- Personalization at scale
What LinkFinder does better
- Zero LinkedIn account ban risk (private network architecture)
- No Sales Navigator dependency
- Feature-flat pricing across all tiers
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Lemlist | LinkFinder | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | $63/seat/mo (annual) | $49/month (Starter) · 25-credit free trial | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€756/yr | ~€588/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | No (14-day free trial) | No (paid plans only - credit-based pricing) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Lemlist vs LinkFinder vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Lemlist | Derrick App | LinkFinder | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | lifetime deal |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Multichannel Outreach derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
AI LinkedIn Email Finder + Multi-Source Enrichment
Lemlist vs LinkFinder vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Multichannel Outreach Lemlist
$63/seat/mo (annual)
Best for: Multichannel outbound teams
Lemlist offers multi-channel outreach with pricing that starts at a basic paid tier after a free option, plus scalable plans for growing teams. See full pricing breakdown on the dedicated pricing page for all details and options.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
AI LinkedIn Email Finder + Multi-Source Enrichment LinkFinder
$49/month (Starter) · 25-credit free trial
Best for: Solo SDRs wanting LinkedIn email finder without Sales Nav dependency
LinkFinder pricing begins with a free tier offering introductory credits, followed by scalable paid plans; API access is included across all tiers. For complete details and plan specifics, please view the full pricing breakdown on the dedicated pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Lemlist to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Lemlist, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Lemlist if…
- You specifically need multichannel outbound teams
- Best multichannel outreach UX
- Lemwarm = built-in deliverability
- You're already invested in the Lemlist ecosystem
Pick LinkFinder if…
- You specifically need solo sdrs wanting linkedin email finder without sales nav dependency
- Zero LinkedIn account ban risk (private network architecture)
- No Sales Navigator dependency
- You're already invested in the LinkFinder ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Lemlist vs LinkFinder
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Derrick vs Lemlist the better choice for outreach?
+
Derrick excels at seamless Google Sheets integration without CSV export friction, whereas Lemlist requires external workflows and manual list preprocessing. Derrick's native enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, combined with integrated Claude and ChatGPT AI for lead scoring and segmentation, delivers faster personalization than Lemlist's template-based approach. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility for teams managing variable outreach volumes, making it the more efficient choice for data-driven prospecting without complexity.
Is Derrick a viable alternative to Lemlist for automation?
+
Yes, Derrick is a viable alternative to Lemlist, though they serve slightly different purposes. Lemlist excels at email sequencing and multi-channel outreach automation, while Derrick focuses on native Google Sheets data enrichment without CSV exports or LinkedIn dependencies. If you're looking for lead qualification and contact intelligence integrated directly into your spreadsheet, Derrick eliminates the manual preprocessing that Lemlist requires. However, if your primary need is sophisticated email campaign automation, Lemlist may still be stronger. For teams wanting to combine both-enriching prospects in Sheets then automating outreach-using Derrick alongside a lighter email tool often proves more efficient and cost-effective than Lemlist alone.
What’s the difference Derrick vs Lemlist vs LinkFinder in features?
+
Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform with zero CSV exports, while Lemlist focuses on email sequencing and multi-channel outreach automation, and LinkFinder specializes in bulk data enrichment through CSV uploads. Derrick integrates AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, offers real-time email validation, and provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, whereas Lemlist excels at personalized campaign execution but requires external data validation tools. LinkFinder delivers fast bulk enrichment without LinkedIn connections but lacks native workspace integration and contextual intelligence that Derrick provides directly within your spreadsheet workflow.
Which is cheaper: Lemlist vs LinkFinder pricing?
+
Based on pricing structures, Lemlist and LinkFinder prices are not directly comparable since they serve different purposes. Lemlist typically prices per user for a multi-channel outreach platform, while LinkFinder AI offers bulk enrichment pricing with per-batch credits and API access. Generally, for pure data enrichment, LinkFinder AI can be cheaper at scale due to bulk CSV workflows and universal API access, but Lemlist may become more cost-effective if you need extensive multi-channel outreach in addition to data accuracy. Derrick App stands out as a cost-efficient alternative when you factor in 100% native Google Sheets integration, monthly credit rollovers, and no credit card required for the free tier, plus broad enrichment across 50+ attributes and AI scoring, which can reduce total cost of ownership by eliminating CSV handoffs and expensive data enrichment tools. For a direct budget comparison, consider your required volume: Lemlist’s costs scale with seats and campaigns, LinkFinder AI scales with batch credits and API usage, while Derrick quotes transparent credit-based tiers that include transferable credits and no upfront platform lock-in. However, for a single-question answer: LinkFinder AI often presents a cheaper bulk enrichment option at scale, Lemlist remains the more expensive but all-in-one outreach solution, and Derrick can offer a lower total cost of ownership when you need deep, native Google Sheets-based enrichment and automation without additional data tools.
Does Lemlist offer better review scores than LinkFinder?
+
Lemlist and LinkFinder serve entirely different purposes, making direct review score comparisons misleading. Lemlist is a sales engagement platform focused on email sequencing and outreach automation, while LinkFinder is a data enrichment tool for bulk contact discovery. Both receive solid user ratings within their respective categories, but they don't directly compete. For teams seeking comprehensive prospecting with native Google Sheets integration, real-time email validation, and flexible monthly credits, Derrick offers a more seamlessly integrated alternative that combines enrichment with AI-powered intelligence without requiring external CSV workflows or LinkedIn account connections.
Can Derrick replace both Lemlist and LinkFinder for enrichment?
+
Derrick can augment and streamline enrichment, but it does not simply replace Lemlist and LinkFinder for all enrichment needs. Lemlist focuses on multi-channel outreach and campaign automation with built-in but sometimes lighter data enrichment; it excels at scalable outreach but often requires external validation for data quality. LinkFinder excels at rapid CSV-based bulk enrichment and discovery of endpoints, yet it lacks the deep, contextual, multi-source enrichment and integration depth that Derrick provides. Derrick’s 100% native Google Sheets integration, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, plus extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, offer a stronger all-in-one enrichment and outreach support when your workflow centers on Google Sheets and automation. For teams needing robust, contextual enrichment within a single workspace, Derrick can replace or significantly reduce the need for separate LinkFinder or Lemlist-driven enrichment steps, though some scenarios may still benefit from Lemlist’s outreach automation or LinkFinder’s specialized bulk enrichment as complementary tools.
One-on-one
Lemlist vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Lemlist compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneLinkFinder vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how LinkFinder compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
