Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Updated
Clay vs GetProspect vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Clay vs GetProspect vs Derrick: Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows, GetProspect is a linkedin email finder chrome extension + 200m+ b2b contact database. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Clay or GetProspect) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Clay or GetProspect for outreach.
Email + phone finders like Clay live on data freshness and source diversity. The side-by-side comparison below pits Clay's coverage by region, free-tier ceiling and credit-burn rate against Derrick's flat-credit pool that funds email + phone + LinkedIn + firmographics from one wallet.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Clay vs GetProspect vs Derrick at a glance
GetProspect
- Starting price: Free 50 emails/mo · Starter $34/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 valid emails/mo + 100 verifications
- Founded: 2016
- HQ: Kyiv, Ukraine
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Clay and GetProspect
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Save 5–10h/month with native Google Sheets enrichment benefits
Clay and GetProspect require separate enrichment steps or external tooling to reach Google Sheets, slowing workflows and costing 5–10 hours monthly in context switching. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, removing CSV exports, complex configurations, and external dependencies. By directly enriching within Sheets, Derrick saves time and accelerates prospecting, translating to tangible efficiency gains of 5–10 hours per month. A quick use-case: enrich 1,000 contacts in Sheets and have verified data ready for outreach without leaving the document.
02 No setup, instant value with daily data cleanliness boost
Clay and GetProspect require time-consuming setup and ongoing data hygiene efforts, delaying true value. Derrick delivers no-setup, instant value by daily data cleanliness-keeping records deduplicated and normalized automatically within native Google Sheets. With real-time validation and 50+ enrichment attributes, Derrick ensures clean, ready-to-use data without manual cleansing, saving an estimated 5–10 hours per month. Derrick’s daily hygiene boost translates to faster outreach readiness and higher deliverability, ready for immediate campaigns.
03 Real-time data quality without complex validation layers
Clay and GetProspect struggle with real-time data quality without heavy validation layers, often delivering inconsistent freshness and limited on-the-fly verification. Derrick differentiates by providing real-time data quality directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating the need for separate validation steps. This saves time and reduces risk: expect higher deliverability and up-to-date records with every enrichment, plus immediate impact on outreach quality. With Derrick, you get instant accuracy without complex setup, enabling faster campaigns and cleaner lists.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Clay, GetProspect, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What GetProspect does better
- Best-in-class LinkedIn Chrome extension
- Strong free tier + verified-only billing
- Large B2B contact database (200M+)
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Clay | GetProspect | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | Free 50 emails/mo · Starter $34/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€1,608/yr | ~€600/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes (limited credits) | Yes - 50 valid emails/mo + 100 verifications | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Clay vs GetProspect vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Clay | Derrick App | GetProspect | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Data Enrichment derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
LinkedIn Email Finder + B2B Database
Clay vs GetProspect vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers scalable pricing with a free tier for baseline use and paid plans expanding with higher credit allocations; see full pricing breakdown for complete details and plan-by-plan specifics.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
LinkedIn Email Finder + B2B Database GetProspect
Free 50 emails/mo · Starter $34/mo (annual)
Best for: SDRs prospecting heavily on LinkedIn
GetProspect offers scalable B2B prospecting pricing with entry-level options and a clear paid tier structure; exact figures and limits vary by plan, with a full breakdown available on the pricing page. See full pricing breakdown for details.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Clay to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Clay, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick GetProspect if…
- You specifically need sdrs prospecting heavily on linkedin
- Best-in-class LinkedIn Chrome extension
- Strong free tier + verified-only billing
- You're already invested in the GetProspect ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Clay vs GetProspect
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Derrick vs Clay more affordable for small teams?
+
Yes, Derrick is more affordable for small teams compared to Clay. Derrick's pricing starts at just 9€ monthly for 4,000 credits with no credit card required for the free tier, whereas Clay typically requires higher minimum commitments and ongoing setup costs. GetProspect offers competitive entry pricing but lacks Derrick's rollover credits feature, meaning unused credits expire monthly. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration also eliminates expensive add-ons like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving small teams approximately 1,200€ annually compared to alternatives, while delivering the same enrichment capabilities without complex configuration.
What’s the Derrick vs GetProspect difference in features?
+
Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that GetProspect requires, saving teams five to ten hours monthly on data management. While GetProspect focuses primarily on contact verification and lead generation, Derrick provides fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact alongside integrated AI scoring with both Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's monthly rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than GetProspect's traditional subscription model, making it ideal for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without complexity.
Derrick vs Clay vs GetProspect: which is best for pricing?
+
Derrick offers the most straightforward pricing model with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams with fluctuating prospecting needs. Clay charges for setup complexity and requires significant configuration time, while GetProspect focuses on volume-based pricing but lacks depth in enrichment capabilities. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates costly external platforms and eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, potentially saving teams over 1200 dollars annually compared to competitors while delivering real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes at competitive price points.
What’s Derrick’s pricing compared to GetProspect’s plans?
+
Derrick’s pricing is straightforward and competitive when compared to GetProspect. Derrick offers a Free tier with 100 credits and paid plans starting at Small for 9, Medium for 20, Large for 47.50, and XL for 175, all with monthly, rollable credits and no credit card required for the free tier. GetProspect pricing isn’t published here, but Derrick emphasizes a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, credits that roll over, and an emphasis on eliminating CSV exports and complex setups. If you’re evaluating value, Derrick’s model may feel more scalable for ongoing, credit-based prospecting without tying you into external tools, particularly for teams already leveraging Sheets.
Does Clay have better review scores than Derrick?
+
Clay and Derrick both maintain solid review scores, but they excel in different areas. Clay scores well for data aggregation and workflow automation across multiple sources, while Derrick receives strong marks for simplicity and speed within Google Sheets. Clay's reviews highlight complexity requiring setup time, whereas Derrick users praise its native Sheets integration, zero configuration needed, and real-time email validation. For teams prioritizing straightforward enrichment without technical overhead, Derrick's streamlined approach often resonates more favorably in user feedback.
Can Derrick replace both Clay and GetProspect effectively?
+
Derrick cannot be said to fully replace both Clay and GetProspect in every scenario, but it can cover many core needs more simply and cost-effectively for Google Sheets–based workflows. Derrick offers real-time email validation, 50+ enrichments per contact, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation, all within a native Google Sheets environment with extensive Zapier/Make integrations. Clay provides broader multi-source data enrichment and complex workflow automation, while GetProspect excels at rapid lead discovery and verified contact data. If your team prioritizes simplicity, speed, seamless Google Sheets integration, and flexible credits, Derrick can replace some functionalities, reduce setup time, and lower costs. However, for highly specialized enrichment, deep multi-source validation, or advanced multi-channel campaigns, Clay or GetProspect may still be the better fit.
One-on-one
Clay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneGetProspect vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how GetProspect compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
