Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Updated
Clay vs Datanyze vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Clay vs Datanyze vs Derrick: Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows, Datanyze is a budget technographic data + contact finder chrome extension (now zoominfo subsidiary). Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Clay or Datanyze) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Clay or Datanyze for outreach.
Email + phone finders like Clay live on data freshness and source diversity. The side-by-side comparison below pits Clay's coverage by region, free-tier ceiling and credit-burn rate against Derrick's flat-credit pool that funds email + phone + LinkedIn + firmographics from one wallet.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 27 000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Clay vs Datanyze vs Derrick at a glance
Datanyze
- Starting price: Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 10 credits/mo for 90 days (Nyze Lite)
- Founded: 2012 - acquired by ZoomInfo 2018
- HQ: San Mateo, CA (now part of ZoomInfo, Vancouver WA)
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Clay and Datanyze
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Get accurate data without manual validation overhead
Clay and Datanyze often require manual validation steps or supplementary tools to ensure data accuracy, risking delays and uncertain deliverability. Derrick delivers accurate data without that manual overhead by providing 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with real-time validation and multi-attribute coverage. This translates to concrete gains like faster campaign launch and reduced validation time, helping teams save hours monthly. With Derrick, you get automatic verification across 50+ attributes per contact or company directly in Sheets, avoiding extra validation cycles.
02 No-code setup, instant value without complex onboarding
Clay and Datanyze often require significant setup and multi-step onboarding to deliver usable prospecting data, delaying time-to-value. Derrick reframes this with a 100% native Google Sheets solution, eliminating complex integrations and onboarding friction. Users typically save 5–10 hours per month while starting to act on enriched data immediately, thanks to no-code setup and instant access to 50+ attributes per contact. A rapid use case: pull and enrich lists in the same sheet and launch outreach without exporting or re-architecting workflows.
03 Real-time data quality without frequent revalidation fatigue
Clay and Datanyze struggle with real-time data quality without ongoing revalidation, often delivering outdated or inconsistent data that forces manual checks. Derrick delivers real-time data quality inside 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating the need for separate validation steps and complex setup. Users gain consistent accuracy across 50+ enrichment attributes with real-time email validation, reducing revalidation fatigue and campaign delays by up to 30-50% in busy cycles. With Derrick, you keep credits in-app and refresh data on demand, ensuring stable prospects without repetitive verification.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Clay, Datanyze, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What Datanyze does better
- Cheapest meaningful technographic + contact bundle
- Strong technographic intelligence (90%+ accuracy claim)
- Intuitive Chrome extension UX
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Clay | Datanyze | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€1,608/yr | ~€120/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes (limited credits) | Yes - 10 credits/mo for 90 days (Nyze Lite) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Clay vs Datanyze vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Clay | Derrick App | Datanyze | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Data Enrichment derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Technographic Data + Contact Finder (ZoomInfo Subsidiary)
Clay vs Datanyze vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with scalable credit-based tiers, starting from entry-level options and expandable plans to fit high-volume outreach; see full pricing breakdown for detailed plan-by-plan details and quotas.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Technographic Data + Contact Finder (ZoomInfo Subsidiary) Datanyze
Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual)
Best for: Solo founders + small teams needing technographic data on a tight budget
Datanyze offers scalable pricing with entry-level plans and ongoing paid tiers, plus a dedicated pricing page for full details. See full pricing breakdown on the Datanyze pricing page for complete details.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Clay to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Clay, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick Datanyze if…
- You specifically need solo founders + small teams needing technographic data on a tight budget
- Cheapest meaningful technographic + contact bundle
- Strong technographic intelligence (90%+ accuracy claim)
- You're already invested in the Datanyze ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Clay vs Datanyze
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Derrick vs Clay comparison highlights key differences?
+
Derrick highlights key differences through its native Google Sheets integration, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that Clay and Datanyze require. While Clay excels at workflow automation and Datanyze at technology intelligence, Derrick combines real-time email validation, fifty-plus enrichment attributes, and integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation-all directly within your spreadsheet. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility than both competitors, making it ideal for teams prioritizing simplicity, speed, and direct spreadsheet-based prospecting without complex setup.
Is Derrick a better alternative to Clay for simplicity?
+
Derrick prioritizes simplicity with a 100% native Google Sheets interface, eliminating the complex setup and CSV exports that Clay requires. While Clay excels at workflow automation with multiple data sources, it demands significant configuration time and technical knowledge. Derrick streamlines the entire process directly within Sheets, offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI scoring without the learning curve. For teams valuing speed and ease of use over advanced automation sequences, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier.
How does Derrick compare to Datanyze for data enrichment?
+
Derrick and Datanyze take different approaches to B2B data enrichment. Datanyze excels at technology stack discovery and firmographic intelligence, making it ideal for tech-focused prospecting. However, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or complex setup, saving teams five to ten hours monthly. Derrick also offers real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier, providing a more streamlined and flexible enrichment experience for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity over specialized technographic depth.
What’s the Derrick vs Clay vs Datanyze three-way comparison in features?
+
In a three-way features comparison, Derrick stands out for its native Google Sheets integration and no-code outreach workflow, Clay leading in real-time data enrichment across multiple sources and automated outreach, and Datanyze excelling in tech stack detection and firmographic intelligence. Derrick uniquely combines 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, built-in AI scoring and segmentation, and extensive automation via 3000+ integrations, all without CSV exports or complex setup. Clay emphasizes multi-source data synthesis and flexible workflows but can require more configuration and ongoing validation to maintain data accuracy. Datanyze shines in technographic and firmographic insights with strong export and segmentation capabilities but offers less depth in contact-level enrichment compared to Derrick. Overall, Derrick provides a streamlined, sheet-centered prospecting experience with value-added AI and rollover credits that are not natively matched by Clay or Datanyze.
How do Clay and Datanyze differ in pricing and value?
+
Clay and Datanyze differ significantly in their core positioning and data strengths. Clay excels at real-time data enrichment and workflow automation, aggregating contact information from multiple sources with strong email validation capabilities, but requires complex setup and can suffer from accuracy inconsistencies across sources. Datanyze specializes in technology stack intelligence and firmographic data with high accuracy, making it ideal for tech-focused prospecting, yet it lacks depth in contact-level enrichment and has slower data freshness cycles. Clay suits teams needing comprehensive enrichment automation, while Datanyze works best for technology-based targeting. For organizations seeking simplicity without sacrificing enrichment quality, Derrick offers a streamlined Google Sheets-native alternative that combines both capabilities without complex configurations or expensive subscriptions.
Can Derrick replace both Clay and Datanyze for outreach workflows?
+
Derrick can replace some outreach workflow needs that Clay and Datanyze cover, but not necessarily replace both entirely for every team. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with no CSV exports, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, which streamlines prospecting directly inside Sheets. However, Clay provides stronger real-time data enrichment from 50+ sources and robust outreach automation, while Datanyze delivers deep technographic and firmographic intelligence for technology-focused targeting. If your primary goal is simple, fast, spreadsheet-based outreach with strong deliverability and flexible credits, Derrick can reduce reliance on other tools. For complex multi-source enrichment, tech-stack targeting, or deep competitive intelligence, you may still rely on Clay and Datanyze in combination with Derrick to cover all gaps.
One-on-one
Clay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneDatanyze vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Datanyze compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
