Evaboot
- Starting price: $9/mo (100 credits)
- Free plan: Trial credits included on signup
- Founded: 2021
- HQ: Paris, France
Updated
Evaboot vs Clay vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Evaboot vs Clay vs Derrick: Evaboot is a sales navigator export, cleaning and email-enrichment chrome extension, Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Evaboot or Clay) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Evaboot or Clay for outreach.
Evaboot scrapes LinkedIn Sales Navigator at scale - fast, but at the edge of LinkedIn's ToS. The side-by-side comparison below covers Evaboot's per-extraction cost, ban-exposure profile and post-extraction data usability against Derrick's compliant Sheets-native Sales Nav import.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Evaboot vs Clay vs Derrick at a glance
Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Evaboot and Clay
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Save €1,200 yearly without Sales Navigator
Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, unlike Evaboot and Clay, which rely on separate data sources or manual outreach paths. Evaboot’s review highlights its focus on straightforward automation rather than deep, enterprise-grade enrichment, while Clay faces data accuracy and API rate-limit constraints that slow high-volume prospecting. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, saving 5-10h per month and €1,200 annually by removing the Sales Navigator dependency. With real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and seamless Zapier/Make integrations, Derrick completes targeted prospecting without extra tools.
02 Real-time validation without data decay for accuracy
Evaboot and Clay both struggle with real-time validation reliability and data freshness, often delivering outdated or partial results that risk mis-targeting. Derrick delivers true real-time validation directly within 100% native Google Sheets, avoiding data decay and ensuring up-to-the-second accuracy. By validating emails and profiles on the fly as you enrich, Derrick saves time and reduces wasted outreach, translating to measurable deliverability gains and fewer rejections. With 50+ attributes per contact and instant feedback, teams can trust list quality before sending campaigns.
03 Universal data enrichment with 3000+ integrations and no coding
Derrick tackles universal data enrichment by offering 3000+ integrations with no coding, a capability Evaboot and Clay struggle to match at scale. Evaboot’s review notes limited native data enrichment and deeper multi-source validation, while Clay highlights the need for careful configuration and ongoing validation to ensure data quality. Derrick resolves this by providing a 100% native Google Sheets integration layer with extensive connectors via Zapier/Make/n8n, enabling seamless enrichment across 3000+ sources without coding. Users gain precise, 50+ attribute enrichment per contact or company and faster workflow creation, saving hours monthly.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Evaboot, Clay, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Evaboot does better
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- Cheapest entry in the category
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Evaboot | Clay | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | $9/mo (100 credits) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€108/yr | ~€1,608/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Trial credits included on signup | Yes (limited credits) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Evaboot vs Clay vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Evaboot | Derrick App | Clay | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Data Enrichment
Evaboot vs Clay vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder Evaboot
$9/mo (100 credits)
Best for: SDRs scraping Sales Navigator at scale
Evaboot offers a no-code platform with approachable pricing starting at a base plan, plus a free tier where available; detailed pricing varies by plan and usage. See the full pricing breakdown for all plans and limits.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible pricing starting at entry-level plans (free tier where available) and paid tiers that scale with usage; see full pricing breakdown for complete details and plan-by-plan options.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Evaboot to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Evaboot, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Evaboot if…
- You specifically need sdrs scraping sales navigator at scale
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- You're already invested in the Evaboot ecosystem
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Evaboot vs Clay
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the Derrick vs Evaboot comparison for features and pricing?
+
Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex setup that both Evaboot and Clay require. While Evaboot focuses on lead scoring with CRM integrations and Clay excels at multi-source data aggregation, Derrick streamlines enrichment directly within Sheets with fifty plus contact and company attributes. Pricing-wise, Derrick offers rollover credits starting at nine dollars monthly with no card required for the free tier, providing greater flexibility than Evaboot's unpredictable scaling costs or Clay's rate limiting constraints. For teams prioritizing speed and simplicity over enterprise complexity, Derrick delivers faster implementation and lower total cost of ownership.
Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for SMBs?
+
Derrick is a strong alternative to Evaboot for SMBs, particularly if your team values simplicity and cost efficiency. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT at competitive pricing with rollover credits. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick requires no LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscription, potentially saving SMBs around $1,200 annually. For teams prioritizing straightforward prospecting without technical overhead, Derrick delivers faster implementation and greater flexibility.
How do Derrick, Evaboot, and Clay differ in pricing and use cases?
+
Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that Evaboot and Clay require, saving teams five to ten hours monthly. Pricing-wise, Derrick's credits roll over each month with no credit card needed for the free tier, whereas Evaboot and Clay charge fixed monthly fees regardless of usage. For use cases, Derrick excels for teams wanting streamlined enrichment directly in their spreadsheets with built-in AI scoring, while Evaboot suits basic automation needs and Clay works best for high-volume outreach campaigns requiring extensive workflow customization.
What’s Evaboot vs Clay difference for data enrichment accuracy?
+
Evaboot and Clay both offer data enrichment, but they differ in depth and real-time capabilities. Evaboot excels at straightforward enrichment with an easy setup and strong data quality checks for standard datasets, yet its enrichment depth and multi-source verification can be limited for complex, enterprise-grade needs. Clay delivers broader data sourcing, real-time validation, and automation across multiple sources, but results can vary with data freshness and source reliability. Derrick stands out by providing 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring within Google Sheets, making complex enrichment faster and more controllable. Credits can be rolled over, and no credit card is required for the free tier.
Is Evaboot a good alternative to Clay for outreach workflows?
+
Evaboot is a solid option for basic lead scoring and qualification workflows, particularly if your team values simplicity and quick implementation. However, it lacks the comprehensive data enrichment depth that Clay provides for outreach campaigns. Clay excels at aggregating contact data from 50+ sources and automating complex prospecting sequences, making it better suited for high-volume outreach. That said, if you're already working in Google Sheets and want to avoid external platforms entirely, Derrick offers a 100% native alternative that eliminates CSV exports, includes AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and provides real-time email validation-all without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant monthly costs compared to both Evaboot and Clay.
Can Derrick replace both Evaboot and Clay in one platform?
+
Derrick cannot fully replace both Evaboot and Clay in one platform for every scenario, but it can cover many core needs more seamlessly. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets with advanced AI-powered scoring, real-time email validation, and extensive automation through 3000+ integrations, offering strong data enrichment and prospecting capabilities within a familiar sheet-based workflow. Evaboot shines in straightforward lead evaluation and CRM integration, while Clay excels at real-time data sourcing, multi-source enrichment, and complex outreach workflows. If your requirements are heavy on advanced enrichment depth or highly customized multi-source workflows, you may still benefit from Evaboot or Clay in addition to Derrick. However, for teams prioritizing speed, ease of use, cost efficiency, and AI-driven segmentation within Sheets, Derrick provides a compelling consolidated alternative without exporting CSVs or managing separate tools.
One-on-one
Evaboot vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Evaboot compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneClay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
