Evaboot
- Starting price: $9/mo (100 credits)
- Free plan: Trial credits included on signup
- Founded: 2021
- HQ: Paris, France
Updated
Evaboot vs Apollo vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Evaboot vs Apollo vs Derrick: Evaboot is a sales navigator export, cleaning and email-enrichment chrome extension, Apollo is a b2b sales intelligence and outreach. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Evaboot or Apollo) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Evaboot or Apollo for outreach.
Evaboot scrapes LinkedIn Sales Navigator at scale - fast, but at the edge of LinkedIn's ToS. The side-by-side comparison below covers Evaboot's per-extraction cost, ban-exposure profile and post-extraction data usability against Derrick's compliant Sheets-native Sales Nav import.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Evaboot vs Apollo vs Derrick at a glance
Apollo
- Starting price: Free / $49 annual or $59 monthly /seat (post-2026 price increase)
- Free plan: Yes (Free forever)
- Founded: 2015
- HQ: San Francisco, CA
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Evaboot and Apollo
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Enrich leads with real-time validation, no manual checks
Derrick addresses real-time_validation needs that Evaboot and Apollo struggle with by delivering instant email validation and enrichment directly within Google Sheets, eliminating manual checks. Unlike Evaboot, which may require separate validation steps, Derrick offers 100% native Sheets integration with real-time email verification. This translates to faster pipeline throughput and higher deliverability, reducing wasted outreach time by up to 15-25% in typical campaigns. A practical example: validate and enrich 1,000 leads in under an hour, with credits tracked and reusable each month.
02 Effortless scalable enrichment with deep AI-driven insights
Derrick tackles scalable enrichment by leveraging 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI-powered scoring and segmentation to deliver deep insights at scale, something Evaboot struggles to match with its more limited enrichment depth and real-time analytics. Unlike Evaboot, which focuses on basic data quality checks, Derrick embeds Claude and ChatGPT for automatic profiling, scoring, and summaries within Google Sheets. This yields measurable gains: up to 5-10 hours saved per month in manual enrichment and clearer, AI-driven prospect rankings that improve targeting efficiency. A typical use case shows Derrick automatically enriching and scoring entire accounts in minutes, not hours, while credits are billable per action and credits are rollable month-to-month.
03 Native Google Sheets workflow flexibility and rapid setup for adoption
Derrick empowers a native Google Sheets workflow with instant deployment, avoiding Evaboot’s and Apollo’s reliance on external or standalone interfaces that disrupt sheet-centric workflows. Unlike Evaboot’s limited data enrichment depth and Apollo’s separate outreach tooling, Derrick lives directly inside Sheets, eliminating CSV exports, extra setups, and complex integrations. Teams can enrich 50+ attributes per contact and validate emails in real time, saving 5-10 hours per month per user and accelerating adoption. Free-tier access and credits-based usage enable rapid start without credit card requirements, making rollout almost instantaneous.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Evaboot, Apollo, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Evaboot does better
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- Cheapest entry in the category
What Apollo does better
- Massive 250M+ contact database
- All-in-one stack at SMB price
- Intuitive list-builder
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Evaboot | Apollo | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | $9/mo (100 credits) | Free / $49 annual or $59 monthly /seat (post-2026 price increase) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€108/yr | ~€588/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Trial credits included on signup | Yes (Free forever) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Evaboot vs Apollo vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Evaboot | Derrick App | apollo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 59$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Sales Intelligence
Evaboot vs Apollo vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder Evaboot
$9/mo (100 credits)
Best for: SDRs scraping Sales Navigator at scale
Evaboot offers affordable entry pricing with a free tier available and paid plans starting at accessible monthly rates; see the full pricing breakdown for all plan details and limits. View complete pricing details on the dedicated Evaboot Pricing page.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Sales Intelligence Apollo
Free / $49 annual or $59 monthly /seat (post-2026 price increase)
Best for: SMB & mid-market outbound
Apollo offers a scalable pricing structure with an entry-level plan starting at a low monthly rate and credits-based usage, plus additional tiers for larger teams-see full pricing breakdown for the details. For comprehensive pricing details, view the complete pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Evaboot to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Evaboot, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Evaboot if…
- You specifically need sdrs scraping sales navigator at scale
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- You're already invested in the Evaboot ecosystem
Pick Apollo if…
- You specifically need smb & mid-market outbound
- Massive 250M+ contact database
- All-in-one stack at SMB price
- You're already invested in the Apollo ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Evaboot vs Apollo
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the Derrick vs Evaboot comparison for automation capabilities?
+
Derrick delivers automation through native Google Sheets integration with built-in AI scoring and segmentation using Claude and ChatGPT, eliminating the need for external platforms. Evaboot focuses on no-code workflow automation but lacks advanced AI analytics and requires more manual configuration. Derrick's key advantage lies in its 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and rollover credits system, making it more flexible for teams seeking intelligent automation without complex setup. Both platforms automate workflows, but Derrick combines enrichment depth with AI-driven intelligence directly within your spreadsheet, reducing implementation time significantly compared to Evaboot's approach.
Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for SMBs?
+
Derrick is better suited for SMBs prioritizing ease of use and cost efficiency. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately 1,200 dollars annually compared to Evaboot. With 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier, Derrick offers SMBs greater flexibility and lower total cost of ownership than Evaboot's traditional platform approach.
How does Derrick compare to Evaboot vs Apollo all together?
+
Derrick operates as a fully native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex integrations that Evaboot and Apollo require. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring and Apollo provides extensive contact databases, Derrick distinguishes itself through integrated AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for automated enrichment, scoring, and segmentation directly within sheets. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free access, and fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact offer greater flexibility and cost efficiency than competitors, particularly for teams seeking streamlined workflows without technical overhead.
Evaboot vs Apollo pricing: which is more affordable?
+
Evaboot and Apollo pricing are not directly comparable on a single price tag, as both emphasize different strengths-Evaboot centers on intuitive automation with basic to mid-level enrichment, often appealing to smaller teams, while Apollo leans into large-scale outbound prospecting with a strong data footprint and outbound tooling. In general, Evaboot’s plans tend to scale with dataset size and feature depth, which can become less predictable for enterprise volumes. Apollo pricing reflects its breadth of data and multi-channel capabilities, which can be more expensive for teams needing extensive enrichment. Derrick, by contrast, offers a transparent credit-based model built into Google Sheets with 100% native usage, including real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring, and broad integrations, plus credit rollovers and a free tier without a credit card requirement. If affordability is the primary concern and you value a no-friction, no-CSV export workflow, Derrick can often be more cost-efficient at scale due to credits and native Google Sheets integration, while still delivering robust enrichment and AI capabilities that complement or replace separate data tools.
Which has better features for data enrichment, Evaboot or Apollo?
+
Both Evaboot and Apollo offer data enrichment capabilities, but with different strengths. Evaboot excels at straightforward data quality assessment and lead scoring with an intuitive interface, while Apollo provides access to a larger contact database with strong email verification accuracy. However, both platforms have limitations-Evaboot struggles with complex enrichment scenarios and processing large datasets, while Apollo requires manual verification for niche industries and lacks real-time data refresh capabilities. For teams seeking more comprehensive enrichment with greater flexibility, Derrick App offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring directly within Google Sheets without the need for external platforms or complex configurations.
Can Derrick replace Evaboot and Apollo for your workflow?
+
Derrick can replace Evaboot and Apollo for many workflow needs, but it depends on your priorities. Derrick’s strongest value comes from being 100% native to Google Sheets, meaning no exports or complex setups, plus AI-powered scoring and segmentation with Claude and ChatGPT, and flexible credits that roll over. Evaboot excels in intuitive lead scoring and CRM integration, yet it lacks Derrick’s deep AI analytics and native Google Sheets convenience. Apollo shines for large-scale contact databases and outbound automation but may require supplementary tools for advanced enrichment. If your workflow prioritizes seamless in-Google-Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-driven automation with flexible pricing, Derrick can effectively replace both; for deeply specialized enrichment or expansive contact databases, you might still pair Derrick with Evaboot or Apollo to cover those gaps.
One-on-one
Evaboot vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Evaboot compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneapollo vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how apollo compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
