Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Updated
Clay vs Vayne vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Clay vs Vayne vs Derrick: Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows, Vayne is a high-volume linkedin sales navigator scraper with automatic search segmentation past 2,500-result cap. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Clay or Vayne) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Clay or Vayne for outreach.
Email + phone finders like Clay live on data freshness and source diversity. The side-by-side comparison below pits Clay's coverage by region, free-tier ceiling and credit-burn rate against Derrick's flat-credit pool that funds email + phone + LinkedIn + firmographics from one wallet.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Clay vs Vayne vs Derrick at a glance
Vayne
- Starting price: Free 200 exports/mo · Freelance $29/mo (10K exports)
- Free plan: Yes - 200 LinkedIn profile exports/mo permanently
- Founded: 2023 (estimated)
- HQ: France
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Clay and Vayne
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Enrich leads instantly without complex setup failures
Clay and Vayne both struggle with immediate, actionable contacts: Clay often requires careful configuration to achieve reliable enrichment, while Vayne delivers LinkedIn profiles without emails or phone numbers, leaving you with unusable leads. Derrick transforms Google Sheets into a fully enriched, contact-ready dataset without complex setup, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and real-time validation. You get instantly usable leads-emails, phones, and firmographics-without CSV exports or heavy onboarding, saving 5-10 hours per month. For rapid wins, Derrick’s native Sheets workflow eliminates friction and accelerates outbound readiness.
02 No-Credit-Card Free Tier for Risk-Free Testing and Adoption
Clay and vayne illustrate the risk of testing without commitment: Clay’s setup complexity can deter quick trials, while vayne scrapes LinkedIn without providing contact details, leaving teams with “useless contacts.” Derrick offers a no-credit-card free tier that unlocks full enrichment directly in Google Sheets, eliminating upfront costs and onboarding friction. With 100 free credits and the ability to preserve unused credits monthly, Derrick lets teams test emails, phones, and firmographics risk-free and measure real adoption progress. This means you can validate ROI before upgrading, without a bank card.
03 Unified data quality, real-time validation across all records
Clay and vayne struggle with real-time validation and data consistency, often delivering incomplete or stale records. Derrick differentiates itself by providing unified data quality and real-time validation across all records directly within Google Sheets, without exporting to external tools. This approach yields tangible gains: up to 20–30% faster cleanup cycles and reduced erroneous outreach, with 50+ attributes validated per contact and immediate feedback on data quality. Use cases include instant verification during list build and continuous hygiene as records flow into campaigns.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Clay, Vayne, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What Vayne does better
- Only tool segmenting Sales Nav searches past 2,500 results (unique)
- Genuinely usable free tier (200 exports/mo permanent)
- Real-time scraping + automatic data cleaning
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Clay | Vayne | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | Free 200 exports/mo · Freelance $29/mo (10K exports) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€1,608/yr | ~€2,400/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes (limited credits) | Yes - 200 LinkedIn profile exports/mo permanently | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Clay vs Vayne vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Clay | Derrick App | vayne | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
Pricing in a nutshell Data Enrichment derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
High-Volume LinkedIn Sales Navigator Scraper
Clay vs Vayne vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible paid tiers starting at a budget-friendly entry point, plus a potential free tier depending on usage-details available on the pricing page. See full pricing breakdown for all plans and options.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
High-Volume LinkedIn Sales Navigator Scraper Vayne
Free 200 exports/mo · Freelance $29/mo (10K exports)
Best for: Sales teams + agencies scraping Sales Navigator at high volume
Vayne offers a free plan with limited exports and paid tiers starting at $29/month, with a clear path to higher-volume options-see full pricing breakdown for all details. For complete pricing details, view the dedicated Vayne pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Clay to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Clay, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick Vayne if…
- You specifically need sales teams + agencies scraping sales navigator at high volume
- Only tool segmenting Sales Nav searches past 2,500 results (unique)
- Genuinely usable free tier (200 exports/mo permanent)
- You're already invested in the Vayne ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Clay vs Vayne
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Derrick vs Clay is better for fast setup and use?
+
Derrick offers faster setup and use compared to Clay. Derrick is fully native to Google Sheets with no CSV exports or complex configuration required, while Clay demands significant setup time and workflow customization. Derrick requires no LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscription, saving teams money and setup friction. Additionally, Derrick provides real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring directly in your spreadsheet, enabling immediate outreach without switching between multiple tools. For teams prioritizing speed and simplicity, Derrick eliminates the learning curve that Clay users frequently encounter.
Is Derrick a strong alternative to Clay for enrichment?
+
Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Clay for enrichment, particularly if you prioritize simplicity and speed over complex workflow automation. While Clay excels at multi-step prospecting sequences with 50+ data sources, it requires significant setup time and can suffer from data accuracy inconsistencies across sources. Derrick streamlines enrichment directly within Google Sheets with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and no CSV export friction. You'll save five to ten hours monthly on manual data handling, and Derrick's rollover credits with no credit card requirement for free tier offer more flexibility than Clay's fixed plans. For teams seeking straightforward, accurate enrichment without the learning curve, Derrick delivers faster deployment and lower total cost of ownership.
How does Derrick vs Clay vs vayne compare for pricing and features?
+
Derrick operates entirely within Google Sheets, eliminating the CSV export friction that both Clay and Vayne require. Clay excels at workflow automation and data enrichment from multiple sources, but demands complex setup and ongoing configuration. Vayne offers high-volume LinkedIn scraping at competitive pricing, yet critically lacks email and phone enrichment, requiring separate tools to make contacts actionable. Derrick differentiates through native Google Sheets integration, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits with no card required for free access, and real-time email validation-delivering a complete prospecting workflow without technical complexity or multi-tool overhead.
Does Clay offer better pricing than vayne overall?
+
Clay does not clearly offer better overall pricing than Vayne. Vayne's pricing starts at $29/month with a generous free plan and scales with high-volume scraping, which can be cost-effective for teams focused on volume. Clay's pricing is not listed here in explicit monthly tiers, but their VALUE proposition centers on robust data enrichment across many sources with a more comprehensive workflow, which can come with higher or less transparent costs depending on data needs and scale. For Derrick users prioritizing simplicity, speed, and native Google Sheets workflows, Derrick provides a transparent tiered credit system (Free 100 credits, Small 4000, Medium 10000, Large 25000, XL 100000) with no credit card required for the free tier, plus over 50 enrichment attributes per contact and real-time email validation, which often translates to lower ongoing operational costs and faster time-to-value compared to multi-tool setups. If price is the primary decision factor between Clay and Vayne, Vayne's entry pricing is typically more competitive, but for a unified, integrated enrichment workflow, Derrick remains a strong value proposition.
What are Clay vs vayne differences in data accuracy and automation?
+
Clay excels at aggregating data from multiple sources with strong real-time email validation, but accuracy depends heavily on data freshness and source reliability, often requiring manual verification. Vayne focuses purely on LinkedIn scraping without providing contact information like emails or phone numbers, making exports incomplete and requiring additional enrichment tools. Unlike both platforms, Derrick delivers comprehensive enrichment directly within Google Sheets with real-time email validation, fifty plus data attributes per contact, and integrated AI for automated scoring and segmentation, eliminating CSV friction and the need for multiple tools while maintaining superior data accuracy without configuration complexity.
Can Derrick replace both Clay and vayne for teams on Google Sheets?
+
Derrick can replace both Clay and Vayne for teams on Google Sheets, but with nuanced suitability. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, eliminates CSV exports and complex setups, and provides real-time email validation, 50+ enrichments per contact, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation directly in Sheets. Clay excels at real-time data enrichment and multi-source sourcing but often requires more configuration and handles data through separate interfaces, while Vayne specializes in high-volume LinkedIn scraping without built-in contact enrichment or native CRM integration. If your priority is a streamlined, all-in-one Sheets-based workflow with immediate contact-ready records, Derrick offers a more integrated, simpler alternative that reduces handoffs and friction.
One-on-one
Clay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-onevayne vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how vayne compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
