LinkedIn Phone & Email Finder (EU-First) Kaspr Review: Is It Still Worth It in 2026?
The French-built LinkedIn phone finder, now powered by Cognism's verified data assets after the April 2022 acquisition. Generous free tier (15 emails + 5 phones/mo permanently), GDPR-clean EU-first data, native LinkedIn Chrome extension. The pitch: Cognism quality without Cognism enterprise pricing. The catch: confusing per-credit math, mixed accuracy reports (especially on personal numbers), and limited credits frustrate scaling teams.
- You're an EU-focused SDR who needs LinkedIn phone numbers for outbound
- You want Cognism-grade data quality without Cognism enterprise pricing
- You're GDPR-conscious and need EU data residency / clean compliance posture
- You need US-focused contact data (Cognism's strength is EU; ZoomInfo dominates US)
- You want unlimited credits for high-volume motions (Cognism enterprise scales better)
- You're scaling past 2,400 phones/year (Business cap; Cognism custom pricing required)
What is Kaspr?
Kaspr is the LinkedIn-first phone and email finder for EU prospecting (Cognism subsidiary), founded in 2018 in Paris by Allan Benguigui and Omar Ghorbel to address the lack of accurate prospecting data in the French market. Acquired by Cognism in April 2022, Kaspr now sits inside the Cognism Group and benefits from access to Cognism's verified data assets - improving overall data quality vs the pre-acquisition Kaspr.
The positioning is straightforward: Cognism-quality data at SMB-friendly pricing. Where Cognism enterprise sells custom annual contracts at $1.5K+/seat/yr, Kaspr offers a real free tier (15 emails + 5 phones + 5 direct emails/month permanently) and Starter at €45/month with unlimited B2B email credits. The Chrome extension is the workflow centerpiece - find phone + email on any LinkedIn profile with one click. GDPR & CCPA aligned across all tiers.
Kaspr Plans & Pricing
Prices below from kaspr.io/pricing (May 2026, EUR base). Annual billing yields ~25% discount. Phone and direct-email credits are <strong>annual allocations</strong>, not monthly - Starter's '1,200 phone credits' is 100/mo on average, with rollover throughout the year.
| Plan | Price | Best for | Key limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | €0 | Solo testing + light usage | 15 B2B email credits/mo, 5 phone credits/mo, 5 direct email credits/mo, Chrome extension, lead management |
| Starter | €45/mo (€59 annual) | Active solo SDRs | Unlimited B2B emails, 1,200 phone credits/year, 60 direct emails/year, Sales Navigator + Zapier + limited API |
| Business | €79/mo (€99 annual) - BEST VALUE | Small SDR teams | Unlimited B2B emails, 2,400 phone credits/year, 2,400 direct emails/year, LinkedIn Recruiter Lite, custom permissions, 30K annual exports |
| Enterprise | Custom | Larger teams + advanced needs | Unlimited credits, intent data, advanced Salesforce enrichment, SSO, enterprise compliance |
Hidden costs to know about
Phone and direct-email credits are annual allocations, not monthly - Starter's headline '1,200 phone credits' breaks down to ~100/mo. Heavy phone-volume months can exhaust the annual allocation early. Direct emails (personal addresses) are even more limited (60/year on Starter). Sales Navigator subscription (€99/mo per seat) is required for advanced LinkedIn filtering and is not included. Many users find the credit math confusing - annual vs monthly, B2B email vs direct email, exports counted separately.
Is Kaspr fair value?
For EU-focused solo SDRs and small teams who need LinkedIn phone numbers, Kaspr is genuinely fair value - Cognism-quality data at €45/mo vs Cognism enterprise at $1.5K+/seat/yr. The free tier (15 emails + 5 phones/mo) is the most generous in the EU phone-finder category. For high-volume teams (>2,400 phones/year), Cognism enterprise becomes more cost-effective despite the higher entry. For US-focused workflows, ZoomInfo or RocketReach offer broader coverage at competitive seat prices.
Kaspr Pros & Cons - Summary That Actually Helps You Decide
Based on 250+ verified G2 reviews (4.4/5), 60+ Capterra reviews (4.4/5), Cognism Group press materials, and 2026 testing from LaGrowthMachine, SyncGTM and ProSpeo.
EU-first GDPR-clean data quality
Built specifically for the French market and now powered by Cognism's verified data assets, Kaspr delivers among the cleanest GDPR-compliant EU contact data in the category. France, DACH, Iberia and Italy coverage is noticeably stronger than US-centric tools (Apollo, RocketReach, ZoomInfo).
Most generous free tier for phones
5 phone credits/month + 15 B2B emails permanently free is the most generous evaluation tier in the LinkedIn phone-finder category. Direct competitors (Lusha, RocketReach Pro) require paid plans to access phone numbers at all. Solo founders can genuinely test phone quality before committing.
Cognism-backed without Cognism pricing
Since the April 2022 Cognism acquisition, Kaspr customers benefit from Cognism's verified data sources at a fraction of the enterprise cost. €45/mo Starter accesses data quality that costs $1.5K+/seat/yr at the parent company level - an exceptional value arbitrage for SMB and mid-market teams.
Clean LinkedIn Chrome extension UX
Find phone + email on any LinkedIn profile with one click. Native Sales Navigator integration. Bulk lookups from Sales Nav search results. UX is meaningfully cleaner than older LinkedIn extensions (Lusha, Apollo) and onboarding takes <5 minutes.
Mixed accuracy reports (especially personal phones)
G2 reviewers report inaccurate data with many finding personal numbers and outdated emails prevalent. Mobile/personal phone accuracy varies meaningfully by geography and segment - strongest for French and DACH mid-market; weaker for SMB and non-EU. Direct emails (personal addresses) carry higher inaccuracy rates than B2B emails.
Confusing per-credit math
Phone and direct-email credits are annual allocations, not monthly. B2B emails are unlimited on paid tiers but direct emails are limited. Different credit pools (B2B email vs direct email vs phone) create real confusion. Multiple G2 reviewers complain pricing is hard to understand vs simpler per-credit competitors.
Limited credits frustrate scaling teams
Even Business tier caps at 2,400 phones/year (200/mo average). Heavy phone-volume teams burn through the annual allocation by month 9-10 and either upgrade to Enterprise or pause workflows. The 30K annual export cap on Business also frustrates list-building teams.
Pricing perceived as expensive vs value delivered
Multiple G2 reviewers note Kaspr feels expensive for what it delivers - particularly given the credit limits. The free tier softens this critique for evaluation, but paying customers above the SMB scale often feel they should be getting more credits per euro.
Kaspr vs Derrick - Side by Side
We're biased - Derrick is our product. So this table is the version we'd want our prospects to see before they sign elsewhere.
| KasprLinkedIn Phone & Email Finder (EU-First) | DerrickGoogle Sheets add-on | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing entry | Free 15 emails + 5 phones · €45/mo paid | Free forever |
| Tool category | LinkedIn phone + email finder (EU-first) | In-Sheet contact data + enrichment |
| Where it lives | Chrome extension + web app | Inside Google Sheets directly |
| EU/EMEA coverage | Strong (France, DACH, Iberia, Italy) | Global coverage including EMEA + APAC |
| GDPR compliance | Best-in-class (Cognism-backed) | GDPR-clean global data |
| Phone numbers included | Yes (annual allocation) | Phone enrichment included |
| Credit math complexity | Confusing (3 pools, annual) | No credits - fair-use simple |
Should You Use Kaspr?
A short, opinionated guide. We'll tell you when Kaspr is the right pick - and when it isn't.
Top Kaspr Alternatives
Tools we'd recommend instead, depending on your stack and budget. Derrick first because it's the only one that lives where you actually prospect.
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Why we recommend it | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D Derrick Recommended | In-Sheet contact data + enrichment | Free | No credit math, no LinkedIn extension dependency, includes phones + LinkedIn data inside Google Sheets | → |
 Cognism | GDPR-clean EMEA enrichment at scale | Custom (~$1.5K/seat/yr) | Kaspr's parent company; better at high volume + advanced features; enterprise-only pricing | → |
 Apollo | All-in-one contact data + outbound | $0-119/user/mo | Broader global coverage + phones + sequencer in one platform; weaker EU phone accuracy than Kaspr | → |
 Lusha | LinkedIn phone finder Chrome ext | $29-99/mo | Direct competitor with similar Chrome extension UX; weaker GDPR posture; US-stronger coverage | → |
 RocketReach | Big-DB at affordable per-seat | $33-207/mo | Larger DB (700M+ profiles); US-stronger; higher bounce rates; weaker EU phone quality | → |
 Hunter | Email-first finder with strong free tier | Free / €34-€299/mo | Email-only (no phones); cheaper for email-only motions; stronger US coverage | → |
Head-to-head: Kaspr vs 1 competitor
vs Kaspr vs Cognism
Compare side-by-side → vs Kaspr vs Apollo
Compare side-by-side → vs Kaspr vs Lusha
Compare side-by-side →Three-way: Kaspr vs 2 competitors
Frequently Asked Questions
Quick answers to the questions buyers ask us most often about Kaspr.
Is Kaspr free?
How much does Kaspr cost in 2026?
Is Kaspr the same as Cognism?
How accurate is Kaspr's data?
Kaspr vs Cognism - what is the difference?
Kaspr vs Lusha - what is the difference?
How does the credit math work?
Kaspr vs Derrick - what should I pick?
The Verdict on Kaspr
Kaspr is the right answer for EU-focused SDRs who need GDPR-clean LinkedIn phone numbers without paying Cognism enterprise prices. Since the April 2022 Cognism acquisition, Kaspr customers get Cognism-grade data quality at a fraction of the enterprise cost - €45/mo Starter accesses data that costs $1.5K+/seat/yr at the parent level. Combined with the most generous free tier in the category (5 phones/mo permanently) and a clean LinkedIn Chrome extension, Kaspr is the natural entry point for European outbound motions.
The trade-offs are real but workable. Mobile/personal phone accuracy varies meaningfully by geography and segment. The three-pool credit system (B2B email vs direct email vs phone) is unnecessarily complex vs simpler competitors. Even Business tier's 2,400 phones/year cap (~200/mo average) frustrates scaling teams. And the marketed 'unlimited' B2B emails on paid tiers can feel like a partial value vs what's needed for true LinkedIn-heavy workflows.
For EU-focused solo SDRs and small teams in the SMB scale, Kaspr is fair value. For US-focused motions, ZoomInfo or RocketReach. For high-volume EU teams scaling past 2,400 phones/year, Cognism enterprise becomes more cost-effective. And in all cases, Derrick stays free as the in-Sheet data layer that adds emails + phones + LinkedIn data without Chrome extension dependency or credit-pool complexity.
Switch from Kaspr to Derrick
- Lives inside Google Sheets - where your data already lives
- Free forever plan, 100 credits/month, no credit card
- Native LinkedIn + Sales Navigator import
- MCP-ready: Claude and ChatGPT can drive enrichment for you
Best Kaspr alternatives, ranked
10 picks compared by use case - Google Sheets native, Sales Nav export, deliverability, enterprise compliance.
See the ranking → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Skip the noise - our hand-picked shortlist of email + phone finder tools and the rest of the sales stack.
See the full curation → Stack builderCompare any two tools side-by-side
Pick the right combo in 2 minutes - every multi-tool comparison in one hub.
Browse comparisons →Other Email + Phone Finder tools reviewed
Comparing options? These are the other tools in the same category we've reviewed in depth.
Kaspr's enterprise parent - best EMEA enrichment at scale; custom pricing.
Read review → All-in-one contact data + outbound; broader global; weaker EU phone accuracy.
Read review → Larger DB (700M+ profiles); US-strong; weaker EU phone quality.
Read review → Email-first with strong free tier; no phone numbers.
Read review →