Wappalyzer ★ 3.2/5
Try Derrick free →
Updated
Wappalyzer logo - Tech stack intelligence review Tech stack intelligence

Wappalyzer Review: Is It Still Worth It in 2026?

Wappalyzer is a tech stack intelligence tool with a Chrome extension and lead lists, best for basic tech-stack lookups on mainstream technologies. The Chrome extension is free, and Starter costs $250/month. Skip it if your ICP needs niche tech detection, you need historical adoption data for timing-based outbound, or you only need occasional single-site lookups.

Wappalyzer is a lightweight tech-stack detection tool: free Chrome extension for single-site lookups, paid lead-list product for tech-defined outbound. Cheaper than BuiltWith but tracks fewer technologies (~3K vs 700K) and lacks historical data. Best for basic tech-stack curiosity ; less compelling for serious tech-stack lead-gen.

✓ Buy if
  • Your ICP touches mainstream tech stacks (HubSpot, Shopify, Stripe, WordPress, Klaviyo)
  • You want clean tier pricing without per-filter complexity
  • Your team uses the free Chrome extension and wants the paid lead-list upgrade
✕ Skip if
  • Your ICP requires niche tech detection (use BuiltWith instead)
  • You need historical tech-adoption signal for timing-based outbound (BuiltWith Enterprise)
  • You only need occasional single-site lookups (the free extension is enough)
Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API
www.wappalyzer.com
Wappalyzer dashboard screenshot - Wappalyzer review 2026
Starting price
$250/month
Best for
Basic tech-stack lookups
Free plan
Free Chrome extension
Setup difficulty 3/10 Easy to onboard
Account safety 9/10 Safe for your accounts
Pricing simulatorWhat would Wappalyzer really cost you?Enter your monthly volume, compare Wappalyzer and Derrick side by side.Open the calculator →
Part 1 / 9

Overview

What is Wappalyzer?

Wappalyzer is a UK-built tech-stack detection tool launched in 2008. The free Chrome extension is the product most people know: open any website, see the tech stack (frameworks, analytics, CRMs, hosting) in one click. The paid product is a lead-list builder : query Wappalyzer's database of 50M+ indexed websites by detected technology, export CSV lists with contact data. Where BuiltWith targets serious tech-stack lead-gen at scale, Wappalyzer targets the same use case at lower price-point with thinner detection depth.

Part 2 / 9

Pricing

Wappalyzer pricing 2026

Pricing collected from wappalyzer.com/pricing (May 2026).

Plan Price Typical use Key limits
Free Chrome extension $0 Single-site lookups, developer curiosity No bulk lookups · no API · no lead lists
Starter $250/month Solo lead-gen on common tech stacks 10,000 results/month · API access · CSV export
Pro $450/month Active lead-gen 50,000 results/month · advanced filters · webhook integrations
Scale $850/month Mid-market workflows 250,000+ results/month · multi-user · priority support
Enterprise Custom High-volume / custom integrations Negotiated rates · dedicated CSM · SSO

What the pricing page doesn't show

Result caps per tier matter: exhausting 10K on Starter forces a Pro upgrade. The 3K-technology detection set is smaller than BuiltWith's 700K: niche queries simply return zero matches. Historical adoption data is not available on any tier (BuiltWith Enterprise has this). For timing-based outbound, Wappalyzer doesn't deliver. Contact data is bundled but quality lags Apollo / Cognism: most teams use Wappalyzer for the company list and Apollo for the contact enrichment.

Where Wappalyzer is fair value

If your tech-stack ICP touches the top 1,000-2,000 most common technologies, Wappalyzer Starter at $250/month gives you the same surface coverage as BuiltWith Pro at $200/month. For common queries, the price-feature ratio is competitive. For niche detection, historical data, or extreme depth, BuiltWith is the right pick. For occasional single-site lookups, the free Chrome extension is enough.

Compare Wappalyzer pricing to Derrick Derrick enriches in its web app (or Sheets, Claude, API) on a credit model: 100 free credits a month at €0, paid plans from €9. Pair it with Wappalyzer for tech-stack ICP lists.
Compare pricing →
Part 3 / 9

Verdict in detail

Wappalyzer Pros & Cons - Summary That Actually Helps You Decide

Pulled from G2 + Capterra verified-buyer reviews (Q1 2026), filtered for substance. Wappalyzer's strongest signals : free Chrome extension ubiquity, clean tier pricing, and reasonable depth for common stacks.

✓ Pros

Free Chrome extension is the industry reference

Millions of developers + sales reps have Wappalyzer's Chrome extension installed. It's the default tool for "what is this site running", and it's free with no signup required.

Clean tier pricing without per-feature complexity

Unlike BuiltWith's per-tech-filter model (which requires Pro tier for multi-tech ICPs), Wappalyzer's tiers bundle all features. Starter ($250) covers 10K results with full API access. Pro ($450) scales results + webhooks. Predictable, no surprise upsells.

Detection depth sufficient for mainstream tech-stack ICPs

For ICPs touching mainstream tech (HubSpot, Shopify, Stripe, WordPress, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Salesforce, Intercom), Wappalyzer's 3K-technology set is plenty. Niche detection isn't the use case here.

✕ Cons

Detection depth lags BuiltWith dramatically

3,000 technologies vs BuiltWith's 700,000+. For niche queries (specific Shopify apps, build tools, payment processors beyond Stripe, regional CRMs), Wappalyzer simply returns zero matches. Sophisticated tech-stack ICPs hit this wall fast.

No historical adoption / churn data

Wappalyzer shows current tech stack but no history. Companies that recently switched from HubSpot to Marketo, or added Klaviyo in the last 30 days: those triggers are invisible. BuiltWith's historical data (since 2007) is the killer feature this category needs for timing-based outbound.

Contact data bundled but quality is weak

Same constraint as BuiltWith: emails and phones are included but quality lags Apollo and Cognism. Most teams use Wappalyzer for the company list and run contacts through Apollo for enrichment.

Part 4 / 9

The honest comparison

Wappalyzer vs Derrick - Side by Side

We're biased - Derrick is our product. So this table is the version we'd want our prospects to see before they sign elsewhere.

WappalyzerTech stack intelligence DerrickWeb app · Sheets · Claude · API
Pricing entry $250/month (Starter) Free plan · from €20/month
Technologies tracked ~3,000 Via integrated providers
Historical adoption data Not available N/A
Pricing complexity Clean tiers, all features bundled Public, from €20/month
Free Chrome extension Yes (industry reference) Free web app (100 credits/mo)
Bundled contact data Included but weaker quality Derrick search + enrich
Wappalyzer wins on price for mainstream tech-stack ICPs and on tier-pricing simplicity. BuiltWith wins on detection depth and historical data. Derrick is the enrichment layer (web app, Sheets, Claude, API) that pairs with either for tech-defined ICP workflows.
Detect a company's tech stack from its website in Derrick's web app, nothing to install
Try Derrick free → 100 free credits · No credit card · 30-second setup
Part 5 / 9

Decision tree

Should You Use Wappalyzer?

A short, opinionated guide. We'll tell you when Wappalyzer is the right pick - and when it isn't.

✓ Use Wappalyzer if you are…
Your ICP touches the top 1,000 most common technologies Wappalyzer Starter ($250/mo)
You want predictable tier pricing without filter-counting Wappalyzer Starter or Pro
You only need occasional curiosity lookups Wappalyzer free Chrome extension
✕ Skip Wappalyzer if you are…
Your ICP requires niche tech detection BuiltWith Pro or Enterprise
You need historical tech-adoption data BuiltWith Enterprise (unique feature)
Your ICP is firmographic, not tech-defined Apollo or Cognism
Part 6 / 9

Alternatives

Tech stack intelligence alternatives to Wappalyzer

Tools we'd recommend instead, depending on your stack and budget. Derrick first because it's the only one that lives where you actually prospect.

Tool Typical use Starting price What it does differently
Derrick Recommended
Enrichment layer (web app, Sheets, Claude, API) from €20/month Pairs with Wappalyzer for tech-defined lists · Credits roll over · MCP-ready →
BuiltWith
Deep tech-stack intelligence $50/mo+ per filter 700K+ technologies + historical data, more expensive at scale →
Datanyze
Tech-stack + contact data hybrid $29/user/mo Bundles contacts, similar surface tech detection →
SimilarWeb
Web traffic + competitive intelligence $199/mo+ Traffic-first, not tech-first →
HG Insights
Enterprise tech intelligence Custom (enterprise) Deeper enterprise data, sales-led pricing →
Apollo.io
Database + sender + basic tech filter $49/user/mo Tech filter bundled with contact DB at low cost →

Head-to-head: Wappalyzer vs 1 competitor

Part 7 / 9

The verdict

Who should skip Wappalyzer

Wappalyzer is the right tool for mainstream tech-stack ICP outbound on a budget: the $250/month Starter tier covers the most common technologies with predictable tier pricing, no per-filter math. The free Chrome extension's ubiquity makes it the default "what's this site running" tool in the industry, and the paid product benefits from that brand familiarity. The platform fails for niche tech detection (BuiltWith is materially deeper) and for timing-based outbound (BuiltWith Enterprise's historical data is unique). For its core ICP (teams targeting top-1,000 mainstream technologies), Wappalyzer's price-to-feature ratio is the cleanest in the category.

3.2/5
Overall verdict

Score breakdown

  • Ease of use4.5/5The free Chrome extension is the default tool for checking what a website runs.
  • Data quality2.5/5Around 3,000 technologies detected with no adoption history, and bundled contact data is weak.
  • Pricing value3.5/5Clean tier pricing from $250/month bundles features without per-filter math.
  • Support & reliability3.0/5Millions of developers and sales reps use the extension, but the paid data lacks history.

derrick •

Switch from Wappalyzer to Derrick

  • Web app: import a list or paste LinkedIn URLs, nothing to install
  • Free plan: 100 credits every month, no credit card
  • Also in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API
  • Native LinkedIn and Sales Navigator import
Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

No credit card · No contract

How we review

We read Wappalyzer's public pricing page and documentation, analyse verified user reviews on G2 and Capterra, and compare it with Derrick on the same criteria. Derrick is our product, and we say so in every comparison.

Reviewed by Jonathan Maurin, founder of Derrick Last updated

Part 8 / 9

Compare

Part 9 / 9

Keep exploring

Any questions?

Stop copying data around. Start enriching.

Is Wappalyzer free?

+
Wappalyzer's Chrome extension is free with no signup: anyone can install it to inspect any website's tech stack. The paid Lead Lists product (bulk queries, CSV export, API access) starts at $250/month.

How many technologies does Wappalyzer detect?

+
Approximately 3,000 technologies as of mid-2026. This covers the most common stacks (analytics, advertising platforms, CMSs, frameworks, hosting, payment processors) but is dramatically less than BuiltWith's 700,000+. For mainstream tech-stack ICPs, sufficient ; for niche detection, BuiltWith goes deeper.

What's the difference between Wappalyzer and BuiltWith?

+
Both detect web technologies on sites. Wappalyzer is cheaper ($250+/mo, clean tier pricing) with smaller detection depth (3K technologies, no historical data). BuiltWith is more expensive ($50-2,000+/mo, per-tech-filter pricing) with much deeper detection (700K+ technologies, historical adoption data since 2007). For common tech-stack ICPs, Wappalyzer ; for niche detection or timing-based outbound, BuiltWith.

Does Wappalyzer have historical tech-adoption data?

+
No. Wappalyzer shows current tech stack only. Companies that recently switched from one technology to another, or added a new tool in the last 30 days, aren't surfaced. For timing-based outbound triggered by tech-stack changes, BuiltWith Enterprise is the only tool that tracks this.

Can I use Wappalyzer for contact data?

+
Wappalyzer bundles contact data (emails, phones) with each detected site, but quality lags dedicated contact platforms like Apollo or Cognism: bounce rates of 30-40% on outbound campaigns are common. Most teams use Wappalyzer for the tech-filter signal and run contacts through Apollo for enrichment.

Can I export Wappalyzer data to CSV?

+
Yes. CSV export is included on every paid tier (Pro $250 (5K results) and above). API access is also bundled across all paid tiers, unlike BuiltWith which gates API to Pro and above.