Tech stack intelligence Wappalyzer Review: Is It Still Worth It in 2026?
Wappalyzer is a tech stack intelligence tool with a Chrome extension and lead lists, best for basic tech-stack lookups on mainstream technologies. The Chrome extension is free, and Starter costs $250/month. Skip it if your ICP needs niche tech detection, you need historical adoption data for timing-based outbound, or you only need occasional single-site lookups.
Wappalyzer is a lightweight tech-stack detection tool: free Chrome extension for single-site lookups, paid lead-list product for tech-defined outbound. Cheaper than BuiltWith but tracks fewer technologies (~3K vs 700K) and lacks historical data. Best for basic tech-stack curiosity ; less compelling for serious tech-stack lead-gen.
- Your ICP touches mainstream tech stacks (HubSpot, Shopify, Stripe, WordPress, Klaviyo)
- You want clean tier pricing without per-filter complexity
- Your team uses the free Chrome extension and wants the paid lead-list upgrade
- Your ICP requires niche tech detection (the 3K-technology set will miss it)
- You need a tech-adoption signal for timing-based outbound (Derrick Signal alerts on tech-stack moves)
- You only need occasional single-site lookups (the free extension is enough)
Install the add-on and enrich your lists without leaving your spreadsheet.
Install in Google Sheets →https://app1.derrick-app.com/mcp Call the same enrichment endpoints straight from your own stack or workflow.
Read the API docs →
Overview
What is Wappalyzer?
Wappalyzer is a UK-built tech-stack detection tool launched in 2008. The free Chrome extension is the product most people know: open any website, see the tech stack (frameworks, analytics, CRMs, hosting) in one click. The paid product is a lead-list builder : query Wappalyzer's database of 50M+ indexed websites by detected technology, export CSV lists with contact data. It targets tech-stack lead-gen at a lower price point, with a thinner detection set.
Pricing
Wappalyzer pricing 2026
Pricing collected from wappalyzer.com/pricing (May 2026).
| Plan | Price | Typical use | Key limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Chrome extension | $0 | Single-site lookups, developer curiosity | No bulk lookups · no API · no lead lists |
| Starter | $250/month | Solo lead-gen on common tech stacks | 10,000 results/month · API access · CSV export |
| Pro | $450/month | Active lead-gen | 50,000 results/month · advanced filters · webhook integrations |
| Scale | $850/month | Mid-market workflows | 250,000+ results/month · multi-user · priority support |
| Enterprise | Custom | High-volume / custom integrations | Negotiated rates · dedicated CSM · SSO |
What the pricing page doesn't show
Result caps per tier matter: exhausting 10K on Starter forces a Pro upgrade. The 3K-technology detection set is smaller than BuiltWith's 700K: niche queries simply return zero matches. Historical adoption data is not available on any tier. For timing-based outbound, Wappalyzer doesn't deliver. Contact data is bundled but quality is uneven: many teams use Wappalyzer for the company list and enrich contacts separately.
Where Wappalyzer is fair value
If your tech-stack ICP touches the top 1,000-2,000 most common technologies, Wappalyzer Starter at $250/month gives you the same surface coverage as BuiltWith Pro at $200/month. For niche detection or historical data, it falls short. For occasional single-site lookups, the free Chrome extension is enough.
Verdict in detail
Wappalyzer Pros & Cons - Summary That Actually Helps You Decide
Pulled from G2 + Capterra verified-buyer reviews (Q1 2026), filtered for substance. Recurring themes: the free Chrome extension, simple tier pricing, and enough depth for common stacks.
Free Chrome extension, no signup
Millions of developers + sales reps have Wappalyzer's Chrome extension installed. It answers "what is this site running" in one click, free with no signup required.
Clean tier pricing without per-feature complexity
Unlike BuiltWith's per-tech-filter model (which requires Pro tier for multi-tech ICPs), Wappalyzer's tiers bundle all features. Starter ($250) covers 10K results with full API access. Pro ($450) scales results + webhooks. Predictable pricing.
Detection depth sufficient for mainstream tech-stack ICPs
For ICPs touching mainstream tech (HubSpot, Shopify, Stripe, WordPress, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Salesforce, Intercom), Wappalyzer's 3K-technology set covers the basics. Niche detection isn't the use case here.
Detection depth lags BuiltWith dramatically
3,000 technologies vs BuiltWith's 700,000+. For niche queries (specific Shopify apps, build tools, payment processors beyond Stripe, regional CRMs), Wappalyzer simply returns zero matches. Sophisticated tech-stack ICPs hit this wall fast.
No historical adoption / churn data
Wappalyzer shows current tech stack but no history. Companies that recently switched from HubSpot to Marketo, or added Klaviyo in the last 30 days: those triggers are invisible. For timing-based outbound, you need a signal on the change itself, which Wappalyzer does not give.
Contact data bundled but quality is weak
Emails and phones are included but quality is uneven. Many teams use Wappalyzer for the company list and run contacts through a dedicated email finder such as Derrick's Email Finder (5 credits per email found).
The honest comparison
Wappalyzer vs Derrick - Side by Side
We're biased - Derrick is our product. So this table is the version we'd want our prospects to see before they sign elsewhere.
| WappalyzerTech stack intelligence | DerrickWeb app · Sheets · Claude · API | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing entry | $250/month (Starter) | Free plan · from €20/month |
| Technologies tracked | ~3,000 | Website Technologies (2 credits/website) |
| Historical adoption data | Not available | Signal alerts on tech-stack moves |
| Pricing complexity | Clean tiers, all features bundled | Public, from €20/month |
| Free Chrome extension | Yes | Free web app (100 credits/mo) |
| Bundled contact data | Included, uneven quality | Email Finder (5 credits/email found) |
Decision tree
Should You Use Wappalyzer?
A short, opinionated guide. We'll tell you when Wappalyzer is the right pick - and when it isn't.
Alternatives
Tech stack intelligence alternatives to Wappalyzer
Tools we'd recommend instead, depending on your stack and budget. Derrick first because it's the only one that lives where you actually prospect.
| Tool | Typical use | Starting price | What it does differently | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D Derrick Recommended | Enrichment layer (web app, Sheets, Claude, API) | from €20/month | Website Technologies + Email Finder + Signal · Web app, Sheets, MCP, API | → |
| | Deep tech-stack intelligence | $50/mo+ per filter | Per-filter pricing, more expensive at scale | → |
| | Tech-stack + contact data hybrid | $29/user/mo | Bundles contacts, similar surface tech detection | → |
| | Web traffic + competitive intelligence | $199/mo+ | Traffic-first, not tech-first | → |
| | Enterprise tech intelligence | Custom (enterprise) | Enterprise data, sales-led pricing | → |
| | Database + sender + basic tech filter | $49/user/mo | Tech filter bundled with a contact DB | → |
Head-to-head: Wappalyzer vs 1 competitor
The verdict
Who should skip Wappalyzer
Wappalyzer fits mainstream tech-stack ICP outbound on a budget: the $250/month Starter tier covers the most common technologies with predictable tier pricing, no per-filter math. The free Chrome extension is widely installed, and the paid product benefits from that familiarity. The platform fails for niche tech detection and for timing-based outbound, and its bundled contacts are uneven. Derrick covers those gaps from one account: Website Technologies, Email Finder and Signal on paid plans from €20/month, after a free plan of 100 credits a month to try it.
Score breakdown
- Ease of use4.5/5The free Chrome extension checks what a website runs in one click.
- Data quality2.5/5Around 3,000 technologies detected with no adoption history, and bundled contact data is weak.
- Pricing value3.5/5Tier pricing from $250/month bundles features without per-filter math.
- Support & reliability3.0/5Millions of developers and sales reps use the extension, but the paid data lacks history.
derrick •
Switch from Wappalyzer to Derrick
- Web app: import a list or paste LinkedIn URLs, nothing to install
- Free plan: 100 credits every month, no credit card
- Also in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API
- Native LinkedIn and Sales Navigator import
Install the add-on and enrich your lists without leaving your spreadsheet.
Install in Google Sheets →https://app1.derrick-app.com/mcp Call the same enrichment endpoints straight from your own stack or workflow.
Read the API docs →No credit card · No contract
How we review
We read Wappalyzer's public pricing page and documentation, analyse verified user reviews on G2 and Capterra, and compare it with Derrick on the same criteria. Derrick is our product, and we say so in every comparison.
Compare
Best Wappalyzer alternatives, ranked
10 picks compared by use case - Google Sheets native, Sales Nav export, deliverability, enterprise compliance.
See the ranking → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Skip the noise - our hand-picked shortlist of database & intelligence tools and the rest of the sales stack.
See the full curation → Stack builderCompare any two tools side-by-side
Pick the right combo in 2 minutes - every multi-tool comparison in one hub.
Browse comparisons →Keep exploring
Other Database & Intelligence tools reviewed
Comparing options? These are the other tools in the same category we've reviewed in depth.
Dropcontact review: 3.6/5. GDPR-first email finder with top French and Western European data, free verifier then paid credit plans. For EU t
Read review →Dealfront review: 3.7/5. Deep EU B2B data plus visitor ID and CRM sync, free plan then Connect at €141/month. For EU mid-market B2B teams, n
Read review →FullEnrich review: 3.7/5. Waterfall enrichment across 15+ providers for emails and phones, 25 free credits then $29/month. For teams consoli
Read review →SignalHire review: 3.4/5. Recruiter contact finder with ATS integrations, 5 free credits then $69/mo ($57 annual). For tech recruiters, not
Read review →