Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Updated
Clay vs Evaboot vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Clay vs Evaboot vs Derrick: Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows, Evaboot is a sales navigator export, cleaning and email-enrichment chrome extension. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Clay or Evaboot) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Clay or Evaboot for outreach.
Email + phone finders like Clay live on data freshness and source diversity. The side-by-side comparison below pits Clay's coverage by region, free-tier ceiling and credit-burn rate against Derrick's flat-credit pool that funds email + phone + LinkedIn + firmographics from one wallet.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Clay vs Evaboot vs Derrick at a glance
Evaboot
- Starting price: $9/mo (100 credits)
- Free plan: Trial credits included on signup
- Founded: 2021
- HQ: Paris, France
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Clay and Evaboot
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Real-time validation without data quality gaps
Clay struggles with real-time validation accuracy and data freshness, often requiring manual checks to avoid quality gaps. Derrick delivers true real-time validation directly inside Google Sheets, eliminating the need for data exports or complex setups. Users gain immediate feedback on email deliverability and contact validity, reducing wasted outreach and boosting deliverability by up to measurable levels thanks to starting with 50+ enriched attributes per contact. Derrick’s native, 100% Sheets-based approach ensures continuous data integrity during prospecting without leaving the workspace.
02 360-degree data enrichment with minimal setup friction
Clay and Evaboot require multi-source setup and ongoing validation to achieve comprehensive enrichment, often lagging on real-time depth and data freshness. Derrick delivers 360-degree enrichment with minimal setup friction by staying native to Google Sheets and automating data pull from 50+ attributes, reducing time-to-value. Users typically save 5-10 hours per month and avoid complex integrations, with real-time validation enhancing deliverability. Derrick also keeps credits reportable and provides seamless, no-code enrichment directly inside Sheets, enabling quick case-ready profiles.
03 Effortless setup with enterprise-grade data governance
Clay and Evaboot both struggle with complex enterprise-grade governance and protracted setup times, often requiring advanced configuration or additional tools. Derrick delivers effortless setup by leveraging 100% native Google Sheets functionality with enterprise-grade governance controls, avoiding CSV exports or heavy onboarding. With Derrick, teams achieve compliant data workflows in hours rather than weeks, saving 5-10 hours per month on governance tasks. A practical use case is immediate, auditable data enrichment while maintaining centralized control over access and permissions.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Clay, Evaboot, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What Evaboot does better
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- Cheapest entry in the category
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Clay | Evaboot | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | $9/mo (100 credits) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€1,608/yr | ~€108/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes (limited credits) | Trial credits included on signup | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Clay vs Evaboot vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Clay | Derrick App | Evaboot | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Data Enrichment derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder
Clay vs Evaboot vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers real-time data enrichment and outreach automation with flexible pricing starting at an entry-level plan, plus paid tiers-details and all plan specifics are available on the full pricing page, see pricing breakdown for complete details.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Sales Navigator Scraper + Email Finder Evaboot
$9/mo (100 credits)
Best for: SDRs scraping Sales Navigator at scale
Evaboot offers a user-friendly pricing structure with an initial entry-level tier and paid plans, details vary by usage. For full transparency on all options, view the complete pricing breakdown on the Evaboot pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Clay to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Clay, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick Evaboot if…
- You specifically need sdrs scraping sales navigator at scale
- Cleanest Sales Nav export in the category
- Massive time savings (2-3 hours → 5 minutes)
- You're already invested in the Evaboot ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Clay vs Evaboot
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Derrick vs Clay: which is better for data enrichment?
+
Both Derrick and Clay excel at data enrichment, but they serve different team needs. Clay shines for complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation across 50+ providers, making it ideal for high-volume outreach campaigns requiring sophisticated sequences. However, Derrick offers a more streamlined approach by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup entirely. Derrick provides real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation, all while maintaining rollover credits and requiring no credit card for the free tier. For teams prioritizing simplicity, speed, and cost efficiency without sacrificing data quality, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value.
Is Derrick a strong alternative to Clay for outreach?
+
Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Clay for outreach, particularly if you prioritize simplicity and speed. While Clay excels at complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, Derrick streamlines the entire process directly within Google Sheets, eliminating setup complexity and CSV exports. Derrick's real-time email validation ensures better deliverability, and its integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT handles scoring and segmentation automatically. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer more flexibility than Clay's approach, making it ideal for teams seeking faster deployment without sacrificing enrichment quality or data accuracy.
Derrick vs Clay vs Evaboot: who offers better overall pricing?
+
Pricing varies significantly across all three platforms depending on your specific needs and scale. Clay operates on a usage-based model tied to data enrichment operations and API calls, making costs unpredictable at scale. Evaboot charges based on contact volume and features, with pricing that can escalate as your database grows. Derrick offers transparent monthly pricing starting at just nine dollars with rollover credits, meaning unused credits don't disappear. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving you around twelve hundred dollars annually compared to competitors. For teams already working in Google Sheets, Derrick provides the most cost-effective solution since it operates natively within your existing workflow without requiring additional platform subscriptions or complex integrations.
How does Derrick compare with Clay for workflow simplicity?
+
Derrick offers a notably simpler workflow compared to Clay when you measure ease of setup, day-to-day use, and maintenance. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets with no CSV exports or complex configurations, minimizing setup time and learning curve. In contrast, Clay delivers robust multi-source data enrichment and customizable automation, but users report a steeper initial setup and ongoing tuning to maintain data quality. If your priority is a fast, low-friction start with familiar tooling and AI-enabled scoring, Derrick generally provides a smoother, quicker path to actionable prospect lists than Clay’s more feature-rich, but heavier, workflow environment.
Which is the better review, Derrick or Evaboot, for SMBs?
+
For SMBs, Derrick offers a more streamlined and cost-effective review solution compared to Evaboot. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports that Evaboot requires, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick includes built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card needed for the free tier. Evaboot excels at lead scoring but lacks native enrichment depth and charges unpredictably as data scales, making Derrick the better choice for resource-constrained SMBs prioritizing simplicity, speed, and transparent pricing.
Can Derrick replace both Clay and Evaboot in one platform?
+
Derrick cannot directly replace both Clay and Evaboot in a single platform for every use case, but it can cover many core needs more simply and cost-effectively. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, enabling real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and 50+ enrichment attributes, all without exporting to CSV or configuring complex connectors. If your team relies on Clay for multi-source data enrichment and complex outbound workflows, or Evaboot for quick lead scoring and straightforward automation, Derrick serves as a streamlined alternative that reduces setup time and overhead while still delivering robust enrichment and automation through 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. For high-precision, niche data or deeply custom enrichment pipelines, you might still need specialized tools, but Derrick offers a strong, single-platform option for many B2B SaaS teams seeking speed, simplicity, and value.
One-on-one
Clay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneEvaboot vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Evaboot compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
