GetProspect
- Starting price: Free 50 emails/mo · Starter $34/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 valid emails/mo + 100 verifications
- Founded: 2016
- HQ: Kyiv, Ukraine
Updated
GetProspect vs Clay vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- GetProspect vs Clay vs Derrick: GetProspect is a linkedin email finder chrome extension + 200m+ b2b contact database, Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than GetProspect or Clay) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with GetProspect or Clay for outreach.
GetProspect competes on hit rate, accuracy and waterfall fallback when one source is blank. The side-by-side comparison below isolates GetProspect's per-find cost (email vs mobile vs direct-dial), real-world deliverability of what comes back, and how it fits into Derrick's 10-source waterfall enrichment workflow.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
GetProspect vs Clay vs Derrick at a glance
Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over GetProspect and Clay
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Native enrichment without manual verification overhead
Derrick delivers native enrichment directly within Google Sheets, avoiding the manual verification overhead that GetProspect and Clay often require for deeper data validation. GetProspect focuses on quick list-building and basic verification, while Clay emphasizes multi-source enrichment that can demand careful setup and ongoing validation, leading to potential delays. Derrick eliminates extra steps by providing 50+ enrichment attributes with real-time email validation right in Sheets, reducing time spent on verification and boosting accuracy in one seamless workflow. With credits that roll over and no credit card needed for the free tier, teams can scale clean data without brittle handoffs or re-verifications.
02 Real-time data accuracy across diverse sources for reliability
GetProspect and Clay both struggle with real-time data accuracy across diverse sources, often delivering data that requires manual verification or shows gaps when cross-referencing multiple providers. Derrick resolves this by delivering real-time data accuracy within 100% native Google Sheets, consolidating 50+ enrichment attributes with immediate validation and up-to-date insights. Users see concrete results: faster list hygiene, higher deliverability, and reduced manual verification time, saving up to 5-10 hours per month. This live verification and multi-source consolidation directly enhances reliability across campaigns.
03 Streamlined setup with minimal training hours
GetProspect and Clay can require longer onboarding and complex configurations to build scalable prospecting workflows, slowing time-to-value. Derrick delivers a streamlined setup that is 100% native in Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and heavy training hours. With Derrick, teams typically save 5-10 hours per month and can deploy enriched, ready-to-use lists faster, thanks to built-in AI scoring and one-click enrichment. A practical use-case: spin up a complete prospecting sheet in minutes for immediate outreach, without technical prerequisites.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where GetProspect, Clay, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What GetProspect does better
- Best-in-class LinkedIn Chrome extension
- Strong free tier + verified-only billing
- Large B2B contact database (200M+)
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| GetProspect | Clay | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free 50 emails/mo · Starter $34/mo (annual) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€600/yr | ~€1,608/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes - 50 valid emails/mo + 100 verifications | Yes (limited credits) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
GetProspect vs Clay vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| GetProspect | Derrick App | Clay | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell LinkedIn Email Finder + B2B Database derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Data Enrichment
GetProspect vs Clay vs Derrick pricing breakdown
LinkedIn Email Finder + B2B Database GetProspect
Free 50 emails/mo · Starter $34/mo (annual)
Best for: SDRs prospecting heavily on LinkedIn
GetProspect offers straightforward, scalable pricing with an entry-level paid tier and a clear path to higher-volume plans; detailed breakdowns by plan and usage are available on the pricing page. See full pricing breakdown for complete details.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible pricing starting at entry-level plans, plus a pricing page with full details and tiers. See the full pricing breakdown for complete credits, limits, and enterprise options.
Migration Guide
How to switch from GetProspect to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from GetProspect, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick GetProspect if…
- You specifically need sdrs prospecting heavily on linkedin
- Best-in-class LinkedIn Chrome extension
- Strong free tier + verified-only billing
- You're already invested in the GetProspect ecosystem
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from GetProspect vs Clay
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Derrick vs GetProspect: which is better for outreach?
+
Derrick and GetProspect both serve B2B outreach, but they differ significantly in approach. GetProspect excels at rapid list building and email verification at scale, making it ideal for teams prioritizing high-volume cold outreach with straightforward workflows. However, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup entirely while offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility, particularly for teams seeking streamlined prospecting without external platform management overhead.
Derrick vs Clay: which platform suits small teams better?
+
For small teams, Derrick edges ahead of Clay with its 100% native Google Sheets integration, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex setup. Clay requires significant workflow configuration and technical expertise to get started, making it steeper for beginners. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and built-in AI with Claude and ChatGPT provide more flexibility and cost efficiency for teams with variable prospecting volumes. Clay's strength in multi-source aggregation appeals to larger operations, but smaller teams benefit more from Derrick's simplicity and lower barrier to entry.
Which has a better pricing plan: Derrick, GetProspect, or Clay?
+
Pricing varies significantly across the three platforms. Derrick offers the most flexible model with rollover credits starting at just $9 monthly for 4,000 credits, plus a free tier requiring no credit card. GetProspect and Clay typically charge higher per-seat or monthly minimums without credit rollover, making them less cost-effective for teams with variable prospecting volumes. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration also eliminates expensive LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions that competitors often require, potentially saving you over $1,200 annually while delivering comparable enrichment depth with 50+ attributes per contact.
How does Derrick differ from GetProspect in data enrichment?
+
Derrick differs from GetProspect in data enrichment by being 100% native to Google Sheets, enabling enrichment directly inside a familiar workspace without CSV exports or complex setup. Derrick offers over 50 enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation for deliverability, and integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring, segmentation, and automatic summaries, all while providing 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. In contrast, GetProspect focuses on rapid lead generation and contact verification with strong real-time validation but more limited depth of enrichment beyond basic firmographics. Derrick also features rollable monthly credits and a free tier without a credit card, which adds flexibility for ongoing enrichment needs.
Is GetProspect a good alternative to Derrick for speed?
+
GetProspect delivers strong speed for basic list building and email verification, making it competitive for straightforward prospecting workflows. However, Derrick edges ahead for teams prioritizing speed without complexity. Derrick operates entirely within Google Sheets-eliminating CSV exports and manual data transfers that slow down GetProspect workflows. Additionally, Derrick's real-time email validation ensures faster deployment with better deliverability, while rollover credits mean you only pay for what you use. For teams valuing both speed and operational efficiency, Derrick streamlines the entire process within your existing spreadsheet environment.
Can Derrick replace both GetProspect and Clay in workflows?
+
Derrick cannot literally replace both GetProspect and Clay in every workflow, but it can cover many core needs in a lean, Google Sheets–native setup. Derrick excels at real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless automation via 3,000+ integrations-all within a familiar Sheets environment. GetProspect shines for quick list building and strong email verification at scale, but its enrichment depth and advanced workflow integrations are more limited. Clay offers rich multi-source data enrichment and visual workflow automation, yet can require more setup time and ongoing tuning. If your workflows rely on fast, in-Sheets enrichment with built-in validation and flexible credits, Derrick can replace several aspects of both, while for highly specialized data enrichment (Clay-style) or large-scale outbound orchestration (GetProspect-style), you may still need supplementary tools.
One-on-one
GetProspect vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how GetProspect compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneClay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
