Updated
Alternatives analysis

BuiltWith Alternatives 2026: 6 Tools Compared on Price and Bulk

BuiltWith is the category reference for tech-stack detection, priced from $50 per month. Teams shop for alternatives when the billing scales by technology filter rather than by row, when the output does not land in their working file, or when the tech signal alone does not tell them who to contact. The 6 options below are compared on detection method, refresh cadence and real cost per row. Derrick App leads on per-row credit economics and on what happens to the list after detection.

Overview01 / 09

Comparison table of BuiltWith alternatives

Entry price, headline strength, ideal profile and overall score. Tools are ranked by curator's overall fit, not by alphabet.

# Tool Typical use Starting price What it does differently
2
Wappalyzer
Basic tech-stack lookups $250/month Wappalyzer is a lightweight tech-stack detection tool - free Chrome extension for single-site lookups, paid lead-list product for tech-defined outbound.
3
Datanyze
Solo founders + small teams needing technographic data on a tight budget Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual) The budget technographic data tool.
4
SimilarWeb
Marketing + sales on traffic-defined ICP $199/month SimilarWeb is the industry-standard web traffic + competitive intelligence platform - 100M+ sites measured for traffic, engagement, marketing channels, and audience overlap.
5
HG Insights
Enterprise tech vendors with IT-spend ICP ~$40,000/year (custom) HG Insights is the enterprise tech-stack + IT-spend intelligence platform - tracks which technologies enterprise companies use AND how much they spend on each.
6
Apollo
SMB & mid-market outbound Free / $49/seat/mo All-in-one B2B sales intelligence + outreach platform with 250M+ contact database.
See the full breakdown of BuiltWith alternatives →

Starting price, ranked

Cheapest first. Bars capped at $200/mo so SMB-tier tools stay readable ; tools with diagonal-stripe bars continue beyond the cap. The dashed line marks BuiltWith's own starting price ($295/mo) so cheaper-than-BuiltWith tools are unambiguous.

Datanyze
$21/mo
Apollo
$49/seat/mo
SimilarWeb
$199/mo
Wappalyzer
$250/mo
HG Insights
$40,000/yr

Head-to-head02 / 09

Head-to-head : BuiltWith vs each competitor

Already shortlisted 2 tools? Jump straight to the side-by-side comparison instead of reading the full listicle.

Context03 / 09

A BuiltWith alternative is any tool that tells you which technologies a website runs, so you can build a target list from a tech stack instead of a job title. BuiltWith is the reference product in that category, priced from $50 per month with free single-site lookups, and most teams start their search there. They end it somewhere else for one of three reasons: the pricing scales by technology filter rather than by row, the output lives in a platform instead of in their working file, and the tech signal alone does not tell them who to contact.

That third point is the one that decides most of these evaluations. Knowing that 800 companies run a given e-commerce platform is a list, not a pipeline. What turns it into a pipeline is the layer underneath: the company record, the people in the right seats, and a verified way to reach them. So the honest way to read this comparison is in two parts: which tool detects the stack, and what happens to the rows after detection.

Derrick App leads this list because it answers the second half inside the file you already work in. You paste a list of domains in Google Sheets, and the sidebar fills in company data, similar companies, the people who work there and their verified contact details, row by row, from 20 EUR per month with a free plan at 100 credits per month. The six options below are compared on budget, workflow, use case and team size, with a frank view of where each one stops.

Alternatives04 / 09

The 6 Tech stack intelligence tools ranked against BuiltWith

Each card shows the tool's positioning, headline features, real pricing and who it's actually for. Click any tool name to read the full review when available.

  1. #2

    Wappalyzer

    3.2/5

    Wappalyzer is a lightweight tech-stack detection tool - free Chrome extension for single-site lookups, paid lead-list product for tech-defined outbound.

    From $250/month
    Best for Basic tech-stack lookups
  2. #3

    Datanyze

    3/5

    The budget technographic data tool.

    From Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual)
    Best for Solo founders + small teams needing technographic data on a tight budget
  3. #4

    SimilarWeb

    3.5/5

    SimilarWeb is the industry-standard web traffic + competitive intelligence platform - 100M+ sites measured for traffic, engagement, marketing channels, and audience overlap.

    From $199/month
    Best for Marketing + sales on traffic-defined ICP
  4. #5

    HG Insights

    3.1/5

    HG Insights is the enterprise tech-stack + IT-spend intelligence platform - tracks which technologies enterprise companies use AND how much they spend on each.

    From ~$40,000/year (custom)
    Best for Enterprise tech vendors with IT-spend ICP
  5. #6

    Apollo

    4/5

    All-in-one B2B sales intelligence + outreach platform with 250M+ contact database.

    From Free / $49/seat/mo
    Best for SMB & mid-market outbound

Pros and cons05 / 09

Advantages and disadvantages of leaving BuiltWith

What you actually gain (and what you might lose) when switching off BuiltWith to one of the alternatives above.

Why teams leave BuiltWith

  • Per-tech-filter pricing punishes complex ICPs
  • Contact data is included but not the strength
  • No outbound automation - pure data layer

What you might lose

Deepest tech detection in the category
700K+ technologies tracked is materially more than Wappalyzer's ~3K or HG Insights' enterprise focus. For niche technology targeting (specific Klaviyo apps, payment processors, build tools), BuiltWith…
Historical tech adoption data unique to BuiltWith
The platform tracks technology adoption and churn since 2007. You can find companies that recently switched from Mailchimp to Klaviyo, or sites that just installed Stripe - high-signal triggers for ou…
Free single-site tool is a brilliant funnel
Anyone can look up any website's full tech stack for free, no signup. The tool is so useful that it's become the de-facto industry reference for "what's this site running" - and it converts curiosity …
  • Free Chrome extension is the industry reference
  • Clean tier pricing without per-feature complexity
  • Cheapest meaningful technographic + contact bundle
  • Strong technographic intelligence (90%+ accuracy claim)
  • Most-cited traffic data in the industry
  • Marketing + sales use cases in one platform
  • IT-spend signal is genuinely unique
  • Best-in-class for Fortune 5000 enterprise targeting

How to choose06 / 09

Choosing a Tech stack intelligence tool after BuiltWith

Two filters : a per-profile pick (cards below) and a granular criteria matrix (budget / workflow / use case / team size).

By budget

  • < $50 / month Derrick App Datanyze Apollo
  • $50-$200 / month SimilarWeb
  • $200+ / month or custom Wappalyzer HG Insights

By workflow

  • Web app + Sheets Derrick App
  • Cloud platform / web app SimilarWeb HG Insights Apollo
  • Chrome extension first Wappalyzer Datanyze

By use case

  • Data enrichment Derrick App Datanyze Apollo
  • Tech intelligence Wappalyzer SimilarWeb HG Insights

By team size

  • Solo / freelance Derrick App Datanyze
  • Mid-market (10-100) Wappalyzer SimilarWeb Apollo
  • Enterprise (100+) HG Insights

The verdict07 / 09

Verdict : which BuiltWith alternative to pick

BuiltWith alternatives split cleanly by job, not by brand. The four profiles below cover most of the searches that land on this page.

  • You need one answer, right now : use a free single-domain check and move on. Our free website lookup tool covers that case with no account.
  • You need a column filled on a list you maintain : Derrick App is the lowest-friction fit from 20 EUR per month, with a free plan at 100 credits per month, per-row pricing and credits that roll over.
  • You need the stack to trigger something automatically : an API-first workflow is the shape to look for, and the question to ask each vendor is the cost per row at your monthly volume, not the headline plan price.
  • You need procurement-grade coverage at enterprise scale : expect annual contracts across the category, and compare on refresh cadence, coverage of your target geography and support terms rather than on monthly price.

Whatever you shortlist, run the same ten domains through two or three candidates before committing, and check the answers against companies you already know from the inside. A tech-stack tool earns its place on how it behaves on your list, not on how it behaves on a demo domain.

derrick •

Try Derrick free

  • Web app: import a list or paste LinkedIn URLs, nothing to install
  • Free plan: 100 credits every month, no credit card
  • Also in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API
  • Native LinkedIn and Sales Navigator import
Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

No credit card · No contract

Key terms glossary

To understand tech-stack intelligence and technographic targeting concepts, see our glossary of B2B sales terms. Key concepts referenced throughout this guide: tech-stack detection, fingerprint library, refresh cadence, historical adoption data, IT-spend modeling and technographic targeting.

Switch to Derrick08 / 09

How to switch from BuiltWith to Derrick in 3 steps

Derrick is a web app: nothing to install, no credit card, 100 free credits every month.

Open the Derrick web app

Sign up on the Derrick web app. Nothing to install, no credit card required: you start with 100 free credits per month.

Import your BuiltWith list

Upload the CSV you exported from BuiltWith, paste LinkedIn URLs, or import from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. The same actions also run in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API.

Enrich your list with one click

Pick the column to enrich and the data you need: emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack. Derrick fills the columns, and the email and phone finders only charge for what they find.

Any questions?

Stop copying data around. Start enriching.

Which BuiltWith alternative should you pick in 2026?

+
It depends on which job you are doing. For a one-off check on a single domain, a free browser-based lookup is enough. For filling a column on a list you maintain, Derrick App runs in its web app or inside Google Sheets from 20 EUR per month, with a free plan at 100 credits per month and per-row pricing rather than per-technology-filter pricing. For enrichment that has to fire automatically inside a CRM or an app, look for an API-first option and compare the cost per row at your real monthly volume.

Is there a free BuiltWith alternative?

+
Yes for single-domain checks. We publish a free website lookup tool and a website technology lookup on derrick-app.com that need no account. For repeated bulk runs, free tiers across the category are usually capped in credits or in lookups per month: Derrick's free plan carries 100 credits per month, and a company enrichment costs 1 credit per company, so a free test list of a few dozen domains is realistic while a monthly run of thousands is not.

Can I run a BuiltWith alternative in bulk on a list of domains?

+
That is the question that separates the tools on this page. A browser extension answers one domain at a time by design. A bulk workflow needs either a spreadsheet integration that fills a column row by row, or an API you can call from your own job. Before you commit, price the same 2,000-domain month under each vendor's model: per technology filter, per seat, per lookup and per row give very different totals for the same list.

Why do two tech-stack tools report different technologies for the same site?

+
Because each one maintains its own fingerprint library and its own refresh cadence. A script loaded asynchronously can be invisible to a detector that does not execute JavaScript, a technology removed last month can persist in a crawl-based dataset until the next pass, and a CDN can mask server-level signals. Treat a detected technology as strong evidence and a missing one as weak evidence, and test any candidate on ten domains whose stack you already know.

Does a tech-stack tool give me contacts as well?

+
Usually not, and that gap is where most technographic projects stall. Detection gives you qualified domains; outreach needs the company record, the right people and a verified way to reach them. In Derrick those are separate, per-row steps: Enrich Companies at 1 credit per company, then a people lookup on the accounts that survived the filter, then Email Finder at 5 credits per email found or Phone Finder at 200 credits per number found. Email Finder and Phone Finder are paid features and bill only when they return a result.

How current is technographic data?

+
It varies by detection method, and vendors rarely publish the number, so ask. A real-time fetch reflects the site as it is when you run it. A crawl-based dataset reflects the site as it was at the last pass, which can be weeks old. On a migration-driven play, that lag is the whole game: reaching a team while they are choosing is a different conversation from reaching them a quarter after they chose.

What should I check before switching away from BuiltWith?

+
Three things, in this order. Run your ten best-known domains through the candidate and compare against what you already know. Price your real monthly volume under the candidate's billing model rather than under its headline plan. Confirm where the output lands: a column in the file you maintain, a JSON response your pipeline can consume, or a platform that will need an export every time.

Keep exploring09 / 09