Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Updated
Clay vs Skrapp vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Clay vs Skrapp vs Derrick: Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows, Skrapp is a linkedin email finder and b2b lead database with verified-only credit billing. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Clay or Skrapp) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Clay or Skrapp for outreach.
Email + phone finders like Clay live on data freshness and source diversity. The side-by-side comparison below pits Clay's coverage by region, free-tier ceiling and credit-burn rate against Derrick's flat-credit pool that funds email + phone + LinkedIn + firmographics from one wallet.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Clay vs Skrapp vs Derrick at a glance
Skrapp
- Starting price: Free 50 credits/mo · Professional $29/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 credits/mo permanently
- Founded: 2016
- HQ: Singapore
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Clay and Skrapp
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Real-time validation without data quality compromises
Clay and Skrapp struggle to deliver truly real-time validation without risking data quality, with Clay’s reliance on multiple sources and Skrapp’s limited real-time verification often leading to outdated or incomplete prospects. Derrick tackles this by providing real-time email validation directly within 100% native Google Sheets, ensuring immediate feedback without exporting data or sacrificing accuracy. The result is higher deliverability and cleaner lists, reducing bounce rates and campaign waste by up to 20-35% in typical deployments. A practical use case is validating inbound signups instantly, so outreach can start with confidence within the same sheet.
02 Flexible 3-in-1 outreach with smarter AI segmentation
Clay and Skrapp either require separate tools or struggle with multi-source segmentation, leaving teams juggling interfaces for outreach. Derrick takes a different tack with 3-in-1 outreach powered by smarter AI segmentation that combines scoring, profiling, and messaging heuristics inside a single Sheet-native workflow. This delivers measurable efficiency gains, such as up to 20% faster sequence setup and more precise segment targeting across 50+ attributes per contact, without leaving Google Sheets. A practical use case: auto-suggested segments and tailored outreach copy in one click, cutting manual prep time.
03 Seamless setup with 5-minute, no-training onboarding
Clay and Skrapp require longer onboarding to configure workflows and verify data quality at scale, creating friction for fast-start campaigns. Derrick delivers a seamless, 5-minute onboarding with no training required by turning Google Sheets into a complete prospecting center, 100% native and ready to use. Users can expect instant setup benefits, saving 5–10 hours per month and starting with real-time validation and enrichment from day one. A quick use-case: import a list and launch an outreach sequence within minutes, without complex integrations.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Clay, Skrapp, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What Skrapp does better
- Cleanest LinkedIn integration at this price point
- Verified-only credit billing + rollover
- Cost-effective at scale
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Clay | Skrapp | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | Free 50 credits/mo · Professional $29/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€1,608/yr | ~€600/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes (limited credits) | Yes - 50 credits/mo permanently | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Clay vs Skrapp vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Clay | Derrick App | Skrapp | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 30$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Data Enrichment derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
LinkedIn Email Finder + B2B Lead Database
Clay vs Skrapp vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with scalable outbound automation, with pricing information summarized on the Pricing page and a full breakdown available there for details. See full pricing breakdown for complete details.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
LinkedIn Email Finder + B2B Lead Database Skrapp
Free 50 credits/mo · Professional $29/mo (annual)
Best for: LinkedIn-heavy SDRs on a tight budget
Skrapp offers entry-level pricing with a free tier and scalable paid plans starting at affordable monthly credits, ideal for small teams building prospect lists. For full transparency on all tiers, limits, and add-ons, view the complete pricing details on the Skrapp pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Clay to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Clay, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick Skrapp if…
- You specifically need linkedin-heavy sdrs on a tight budget
- Cleanest LinkedIn integration at this price point
- Verified-only credit billing + rollover
- You're already invested in the Skrapp ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Clay vs Skrapp
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the Derrick vs Clay difference in data enrichment?
+
Derrick and Clay take fundamentally different approaches to data enrichment. Clay excels as a workflow automation platform that aggregates data from 50+ sources through APIs and web scraping, requiring significant setup time and technical configuration. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, delivering real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes without complex workflows or external platforms. While Clay prioritizes multi-source aggregation and custom automation sequences, Derrick prioritizes speed and simplicity, enriching prospect data directly in your spreadsheet with integrated AI capabilities for scoring and segmentation, eliminating the need for separate tools or lengthy onboarding processes.
Is Derrick a better alternative to Clay for outreach?
+
Whether Derrick is better than Clay depends on your priorities. Clay excels at complex workflow automation and aggregating data from multiple sources, making it ideal for high-volume campaigns requiring sophisticated sequences. However, Derrick offers a more streamlined approach by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating setup complexity and CSV exports. Derrick also includes real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. If you prioritize simplicity, speed, and native spreadsheet workflows over advanced automation, Derrick provides a more accessible alternative. For teams already invested in Clay's ecosystem or needing multi-source aggregation at enterprise scale, Clay remains competitive. Ultimately, test both to match your team's workflow preferences and technical comfort level.
Derrick vs Skrapp: which is better for pricing?
+
Derrick and Skrapp take different pricing approaches suited to different team sizes. Skrapp operates on a per-user subscription model, making it costlier for growing teams, while Derrick offers credit-based pricing starting at just nine dollars monthly with rollover credits, meaning unused credits carry forward. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates expensive third-party tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams over twelve hundred dollars annually. For teams prioritizing affordability and flexibility, Derrick's transparent credit system and zero credit card requirement for the free tier provide better budget control than Skrapp's fixed seat-based pricing.
Which has a better review: Derrick or Clay?
+
Based on overall user sentiment and feature fit, Derrick tends to receive stronger reviews for its simplicity, speed, and value, especially for teams prioritizing a native Google Sheets workflow and robust enrichment without complex setup. Clay is praised for its real-time data sourcing and automation, but reviews often note setup complexity and data accuracy variability. Skrapp excels at fast email discovery but lacks broader enrichment. If you value a streamlined, all-in-one enrichment and outreach workflow within Sheets, Derrick generally earns better review vibes, with added confidence from features like real-time email validation, AI scoring, 50+ attributes per contact, and extensive integrations.
Derrick vs Clay vs Skrapp: overall comparison for teams?
+
Derrick, Clay, and Skrapp serve different team needs. Clay excels at complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, making it ideal for high-volume campaigns requiring sophisticated sequences. Skrapp specializes in fast LinkedIn-based contact extraction with strong email validation, perfect for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity. Derrick stands out for teams already using Google Sheets, offering native integration without exports or complex setup, built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card requirement for the free tier. Choose based on your workflow preference: Clay for automation depth, Skrapp for LinkedIn speed, or Derrick for Sheets-native simplicity and cost efficiency.
Can Derrick replace both Clay and Skrapp for enrichment?
+
Derrick cannot fully replace both Clay and Skrapp for enrichment in all use cases. Derrick excels as a native Google Sheets enrichment platform with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, plus extensive integrations and the benefit of a 100% no-code, CSV-free workflow. However, Clay offers multi-source real-time data synthesis and complex automation workflows, while Skrapp provides fast, LinkedIn-driven contact discovery and verification. Derrick can cover broad enrichment needs efficiently, but teams with deep source diversity or specialized discovery may still rely on Clay or Skrapp for specific gaps.
One-on-one
Clay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneSkrapp vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Skrapp compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
