Published · Updated

Clearbit vs Hunter vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?

Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime

Short answer
Clearbit vs Hunter vs Derrick in short. Clearbit: B2B firmographic + contact enrichment platform. Hunter: email finder, verifier and lightweight cold-email platform. Derrick is a B2B enrichment web app (nothing to install), also available as a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). It is free forever with 100 credits/month, with paid plans from €9/month, and it runs on its own or alongside Clearbit or Hunter.

Clearbit competes on hit rate, accuracy and waterfall fallback when one source is blank. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Clearbit's per-find cost (email vs mobile vs direct-dial), real-world deliverability of what comes back, and how it fits into Derrick's 10-source lookup enrichment workflow.

Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup Nothing to install
Where it lives Web app, plus Sheets, Claude, API

See the full comparison ↓

Trusted by Hands Down best extension for sheets till date. It eased up my linkedin lead collection journey by 10x. Thank you!! Rahul Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace This tool makes enriching LinkedIn URLs incredibly easy. You can enrich both personal and company profiles with a single click, and the Google Sheets integration is a game-changer. Pankaj Rohilla from Google Workspace Marketplace Great extension. There's bigger companies that do 1000x less. Go with Derrick. Ben Leinen from Google Workspace Marketplace It makes my life a lot easier… no more copy and paste and time wasted. Thank you! Cris Forlani from Google Workspace Marketplace Derrick is your one stop solution to data collection and up to date leads data automated collection. 100/100 value for money. Manu Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace This is one hell of a magical tool, it has blown my mind already, it's so handy, just love it. I am exploring how much more I can do with it Jagdip Gohil from Google Workspace Marketplace Loving the smoothness of the experience especially on Chrome. Great value for the price as well. GB Alao from Google Workspace Marketplace I was looking for a tool to enrich LinkedIn data. Very easy to use. Keith Hildebrand from Google Workspace Marketplace Easy to enhance contacts by running bulk lists. Try it James Finlayson from Google Workspace Marketplace +34,000 others

Quick facts01 / 10

Clearbit vs Hunter vs Derrick at a glance

Clearbit

  • Starting price: Discontinued standalone - see Breeze ($45/mo)
  • Free plan: No (legacy free tier discontinued)
  • Founded: 2015 - acquired by HubSpot Nov 2023
  • HQ: San Francisco, CA (legacy) - now Cambridge, MA (HubSpot HQ)
4.4/5 G2 4.3/5 Capterra

Hunter

  • Starting price: Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
  • Free plan: Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence
  • Founded: 2015
  • HQ: Wilmington, DE (US entity) - team distributed (Paris, remote-first)
4.4/5 G2 4.4/5 Capterra

Derrick

Recommended
  • Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
  • Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
  • Founded: 2022
  • HQ: Marseille, FR
4.8/5 G2 4.8/5 Capterra

Why Derrick wins02 / 10

Why teams pick Derrick over Clearbit and Hunter

3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.

01

Enrich leads in Sheets without complex setup

Clearbit and Hunter require separate platforms or manual workarounds to enrich leads, often forcing extra setup or tool-switching in workflows. Derrick delivers web app enrichment (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API) with no complex integrations, directly in the web app (or in Sheets, Claude and the API). This translates to saving 5-10 hours per month and eliminates CSV exports while providing 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. For quick use cases, Derrick auto-validates emails in real-time and keeps monthly credits reportable, so teams stay focused on outreach rather than data wrangling.

02

Real-time data freshness for dynamic markets

In dynamic markets, Clearbit’s real-time updates can falter when data depth and freshness clash with volume, while Hunter focuses on email discovery rather than continuously refreshed company insights. Derrick delivers true real-time data freshness in the web app (or in Google Sheets, Claude and the API), eliminating export or complex sync setups. Users gain immediate, up-to-date enrichment across 50+ attributes per contact and real-time email validation, saving hours monthly and reducing stale records by a measurable margin. Quick in-app workflows and monthly retrievable credits keep Derrick practical for fast-moving teams.

03

AI-powered lead scoring for faster qualification

Derrick delivers AI-powered lead scoring that accelerates qualification, addressing the gap left by Clearbit and Hunter, which respectively focus on data provision and email discovery rather than dynamic prioritization. While Clearbit offers broad company insights and Hunter focuses on finding emails, neither provides integrated, real-time scoring and segmentation within Sheets to drive fast decisions. Derrick auto-scores leads with Claude and ChatGPT, turning enriched attributes into actionable priority signals, saving hours and increasing qualified prospects by up to 20-35% in rapid campaigns. A practical use case is auto-assigning top-ranked leads to SDRs as soon as enrichment completes, ensuring no promising prospect slips through the cracks.

Replace Clearbit: enrich companies with a full company profile in Derrick's web app, nothing to install

Honest comparison03 / 10

What each tool does better

We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Clearbit, Hunter, and Derrick each genuinely win.

What Clearbit does better

  • Strong US/UK/EU firmographic data (historical)
  • Developer-friendly API (legacy)
  • Reveal anonymous-visitor deanonymization
Read full Clearbit review →

What Hunter does better

  • Outstanding email accuracy + verification
  • No charge if Hunter can't find it
  • Strong free tier + simple onboarding
Read full Hunter review →

Real annual cost04 / 10

True cost over 12 months

Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.

Cost item Clearbit Hunter Derrick
Starting price Discontinued standalone - see Breeze ($45/mo) Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual) €0 (free) · €9/month paid
Annual cost (base) ~$540/yr ~€408/yr €0/year free · €108/year on Mini
Free plan? No (legacy free tier discontinued) Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo
Setup cost Hours to days Hours to days Nothing to install (web app)
Switching cost CSV export + retraining CSV export + retraining Zero - works alongside any stack

Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps it to one transparent credit model.

Feature-by-feature05 / 10

Clearbit vs Hunter vs Derrick: full feature comparison

clearbit Derrick App hunter
Works natively in Google Sheets ✕ ✓ ✕
Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) ✕ ✕ ✕
Sales Navigator 1-click import ✕ ✓ ✕
Email finder with real-time validation ✓ ✓ ✓
Phone finder from LinkedIn ✕ ✓ ✕
Company tech stack lookup ✓ ✓ ✓
SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated ✕ ✓ ✕
AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) ✓ ✓ ✓
Automatic AI Lead Scoring ✓ ✓ ✕
Data cleaning & normalization ✓ ✓ ✓
Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) ✕ ✕ ✕
Zapier, Make, n8n integrations ✕ ✓ ✓
Public API available ✓ ✓ ✓
Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) ✓ ✕ ✓
Entry price (paid plan) Discontinued standalone - see Breeze ($45/mo) Free plan · from €9/month Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
Permanent free plan ✓ ✓ ✓
Rollover credits to next month ✕ ✓ ✓
Simple and transparent credit system ✕ ✓ ✓
Simple setup & onboarding ✕ ✓ ✓
Complete documentation ✓ ✓ ✓

Pricing in a nutshell06 / 10

Clearbit vs Hunter vs Derrick pricing breakdown

Migration guide07 / 10

How to switch from Clearbit to Derrick in 3 steps

Derrick is a web app - nothing to install, no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate. Sign up and you're enriching in under a minute.

Open the Derrick web app

Sign up on the Derrick web app. Nothing to install, no credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.

Import your Clearbit list

Upload the CSV you exported from Clearbit, paste LinkedIn URLs, or import from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Prefer to stay in your tools? The same features run in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API.

Enrich your list with one click

Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns in your list. No pipelines, no waiting.

Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime

Decision in 60 seconds08 / 10

Which one is right for you?

Pick Clearbit if…

  • You specifically need existing HubSpot customers (use Breeze instead)
  • Strong US/UK/EU firmographic data (historical)
  • Developer-friendly API (legacy)
  • You're already invested in the Clearbit ecosystem
Read full Clearbit review →

Pick Hunter if…

  • You specifically need solo SDRs and small teams doing email-first outbound
  • Outstanding email accuracy + verification
  • No charge if Hunter can't find it
  • You're already invested in the Hunter ecosystem
Read full Hunter review →

Pick Derrick if…

  • You want B2B enrichment with nothing to install (web app, also in Sheets, Claude, API)
  • You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
  • You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
  • You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
Try Derrick free →

Compare09 / 10

Keep exploring10 / 10

Customer stories

What teams say after switching from Clearbit vs Hunter

See what our customers say about Derrick.

  • Rated 4.6 out of 5 on Trustpilot, 323 reviews
323 reviews

"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."

Alex Clark

Director | SaaS GTM Leader

Reviewed on Product Hunt

"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."

David Sire

Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage

Reviewed on Product Hunt

"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."

Etienne Grange

CEO Form'actions

Reviewed on Capterra

FAQ

Stop copying data around. Start enriching.

Derrick vs clearbit: which is better for data enrichment?

+
Both platforms excel at data enrichment but serve different priorities. Clearbit dominates in comprehensive firmographic data and enterprise-scale integrations with strong API architecture and real-time updates. However, Clearbit's pricing scales quickly with volume, and accuracy drops for smaller companies. Derrick App takes a different approach by operating natively in the web app (or in Google Sheets, Claude and the API), eliminating complex integrations and CSV exports while offering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. Derrick's real-time email validation and integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT provide advanced scoring and segmentation without additional tool costs. For teams already using Google Sheets seeking cost-effective enrichment with rollover credits and no upfront commitments, Derrick delivers better efficiency. For enterprises needing maximum firmographic depth and multi-platform integrations, Clearbit remains stronger. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize operational simplicity and cost control or maximum data breadth at scale.

Is Derrick a good alternative to clearbit for SMBs?

+
Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Clearbit for SMBs, particularly if your team works primarily in Google Sheets. While Clearbit focuses on comprehensive firmographic data and API integrations, it can become costly as you scale. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring directly in the web app (or in Google Sheets, Claude and the API)-eliminating expensive third-party tools and manual data work. For budget-conscious SMBs, Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for the free tier, and lower pricing tiers make it more accessible than Clearbit's enterprise-focused model, especially if you prioritize simplicity over advanced API architecture.

Derrick vs clearbit vs hunter: which offers better pricing?

+
Pricing varies significantly across the three platforms. Clearbit operates on a tiered model based on API calls and data volume, making it expensive at scale, while Hunter charges per email search with reasonable starter plans but limited enrichment depth. Derrick offers the most flexible pricing with rollover credits starting at just €9 monthly, no credit card required for the free tier, and transparent per-credit costs. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick's rollover credits and lower entry point provide better value, especially if you're already working in Google Sheets and want to avoid expensive third-party integrations or additional tool subscriptions.

How does clearbit compare to hunter for firmographics data?

+
For firmographics data, Clearbit offers broad coverage and real-time enrichment with strong CRM integrations, but its depth can vary by company size and market, and pricing can scale quickly. Hunter, by contrast, focuses on accurate email discovery with limited firmographic depth and fewer enrichment capabilities. Derrick stands out as a web app solution (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API) with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and AI-assisted scoring and segmentation, all without complex setup or a credit card for the free tier. If you need comprehensive firmographics at scale within a familiar worksheet workflow, Derrick provides a more cost-efficient, integrated alternative-especially when you value ease of use and ongoing credit flexibility.

What’s the difference between Derrick and hunter in use cases?

+
Derrick and Hunter serve distinctly different use cases within the B2B prospecting workflow. Hunter specializes exclusively in email discovery and verification, excelling at finding accurate business email addresses from domain names with minimal friction. Derrick, conversely, operates as a comprehensive enrichment platform available in the web app, Google Sheets, Claude and the API, delivering fifty-plus contact and company attributes beyond email alone-including technographics, decision-maker intelligence, and real-time validation. While Hunter works best for teams prioritizing email accuracy in isolation, Derrick suits organizations needing multi-dimensional prospect research, AI-powered scoring, and seamless workflow automation without leaving the web app or their spreadsheet environment. Hunter requires external tools for firmographic depth; Derrick consolidates enrichment, segmentation, and outreach preparation into one unified workspace.

Can Derrick replace both clearbit and hunter for pricing and reviews?

+
Derrick cannot fully replace both Clearbit and Hunter for pricing and reviews in a single switch, but it can cover several core needs more efficiently depending on your setup. Derrick excels as a web app enrichment platform (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API) with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make integrations. For pricing transparency and detailed company intelligence (firmographics, technographics, and decision-maker context), Clearbit remains strong, while Hunter specializes in accurate email discovery and verification. If your priority is a lean, Google Sheets–driven workflow with cost control and credits you can roll over, Derrick can reduce reliance on separate tools, but you may still want Clearbit or Hunter for specialized data or email accuracy at scale.