Dux-Soup
- Starting price: $11.25/mo (Pro Dux, annual)
- Free plan: 14-day free trial (no credit card)
- Founded: 2015 (entity Supertec B.V., registered 2016)
- HQ: Breda, North Brabant, Netherlands (Supertec B.V.)
Updated
Dux-Soup vs Clay vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Dux-Soup vs Clay vs Derrick: Dux-Soup is a veteran chrome-extension linkedin automation tool with broad crm integrations, Clay is a multi-source data enrichment with ai workflows. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Dux-Soup or Clay) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Dux-Soup or Clay for outreach.
Where Dux-Soup bets on automating LinkedIn at scale, Derrick bets on owning the data BEFORE you ever touch LinkedIn. The side-by-side comparison below tracks Dux-Soup's account-ban risk, session-breakage downtime and post-action data export quality against Derrick's Sheets-native LinkedIn search and enrichment.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Dux-Soup vs Clay vs Derrick at a glance
Clay
- Starting price: Free / $134/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes (limited credits)
- Founded: 2017
- HQ: New York, NY
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Dux-Soup and Clay
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Real-time validation without data gaps for outreach workflows
Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn automation and profile scraping, but real-time validation and data completeness for outreach workflows can lag, leaving gaps in contact records. Derrick delivers real-time email validation directly within a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, eliminating data gaps without exporting or switching tools. This translates into higher deliverability and faster outreach, saving 5-10 hours per month of manual verification. Clay offers real-time enrichment across multiple sources, yet its validation speed and consistency can vary by source and freshness, whereas Derrick guarantees immediate validation within the sheet you already use.
02 No setup required for complex data sourcing
Dux-Soup and Clay both require setup or multiple source configurations to build complex data profiles, often leaving gaps when sourcing beyond LinkedIn or primary feeds. Derrick addresses this by offering a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with no CSV exports or complex wiring, unifying enrichment across 50+ attributes from multiple origins. This delivers tangible time savings and accuracy, removing manual assembly-users report 5-10 hours saved per month and a streamlined, no-setup data sourcing process. A quick use case: Derrick auto-enriches a prospect list in Sheets in minutes, without leaving the platform or juggling integrations.
03 Unified data governance for compliant enrichment at scale
Unified data governance for compliant enrichment at scale demands consistent, verifiable records beyond what Dux-Soup or Clay can provide. Dux-Soup limits enrichment to LinkedIn-native data and carries compliance risks with automation; Clay’s sources vary in freshness and rely on external providers, challenging real-time accuracy. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets governance with verifiable, reportable credits and integrated validation, ensuring compliant enrichment at scale. With Derrick, teams gain consistent attribute coverage (50+ per contact) and auditable data lineage, reducing rework and improving deliverability across campaigns.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Dux-Soup, Clay, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Dux-Soup does better
- Broadest native CRM integration in the category
- Strong meeting volume + time savings
- Genuinely responsive customer support
What Clay does better
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- Open architecture (HTTP API + custom functions)
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Dux-Soup | Clay | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | $11.25/mo (Pro Dux, annual) | Free / $134/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€132/yr | ~€1,608/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | 14-day free trial (no credit card) | Yes (limited credits) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Dux-Soup vs Clay vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| Dux-Soup | Derrick App | Clay | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell LinkedIn Automation (Veteran Chrome Extension) derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Data Enrichment
Dux-Soup vs Clay vs Derrick pricing breakdown
LinkedIn Automation (Veteran Chrome Extension) Dux-Soup
$11.25/mo (Pro Dux, annual)
Best for: Long-time LinkedIn automation users + budget SDRs
Dux-Soup offers entry-level pricing with a free tier and scalable paid plans starting at affordable monthly rates; see full pricing breakdown for complete details. View complete pricing details on the dedicated Dux-Soup pricing page.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Data Enrichment Clay
Free / $134/mo (annual)
Best for: GTM ops & technical SDR teams
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible pricing starting at a low entry point; plans and credits scale for high-volume outreach, with a comprehensive pricing page detailing all tiers and add-ons. See full pricing breakdown for complete details.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Dux-Soup to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Dux-Soup, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Dux-Soup if…
- You specifically need long-time linkedin automation users + budget sdrs
- Broadest native CRM integration in the category
- Strong meeting volume + time savings
- You're already invested in the Dux-Soup ecosystem
Pick Clay if…
- You specifically need gtm ops & technical sdr teams
- Best-in-class waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI for research at scale
- You're already invested in the Clay ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Dux-Soup vs Clay
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the main difference Derrick vs Dux-Soup for prospecting?
+
Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting approaches. Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn interactions like profile visits and connection requests, which carries account risk due to LinkedIn's automation restrictions. Derrick focuses on data enrichment and prospect intelligence directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator while providing real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and built-in AI scoring. Derrick's native Sheets integration saves 5-10 hours monthly versus external platforms, making it ideal for teams prioritizing data quality and workflow efficiency over pure LinkedIn automation.
Is Derrick a better alternative to Dux-Soup?
+
Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting needs. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation with strong compliance safeguards, but relies solely on LinkedIn data and carries account restriction risks. Derrick offers a broader approach with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI for scoring and segmentation, and native Google Sheets functionality that eliminates complex setup. Dux-Soup works best as a supplementary LinkedIn tool, while Derrick provides a more comprehensive, risk-free alternative for teams seeking streamlined data enrichment and multi-channel prospecting without LinkedIn dependency or technical complexity.
Derrick vs Clay: which is better for data enrichment?
+
Both platforms excel at data enrichment but serve different priorities. Clay offers broader data source aggregation and workflow automation across 50+ APIs, making it powerful for complex multi-step campaigns. Derrick, however, delivers faster implementation with 100% native Google Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and setup complexity. Derrick's real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits provide better value for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity. Clay requires more configuration time and technical expertise, while Derrick gets you prospecting immediately without leaving Google Sheets, saving 5-10 hours monthly on data management alone.
How does Derrick compare to Dux-Soup vs Clay overall?
+
Derrick compares favorably overall due to its native Google Sheets foundation, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that Dux-Soup and Clay often require. Derrick uniquely combines 100% native integration, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation (Claude and ChatGPT) within a scalable, no-code workflow via 3,000+ integrations, while offering roll-over credits and a free tier with no credit card. Unlike Dux-Soup, Derrick avoids LinkedIn automation concerns and potential compliance risks, and unlike Clay, it emphasizes streamlined data enrichment directly in Sheets with a simpler setup and cost structure. For teams seeking speed, simplicity, and end-to-end prospecting inside Sheets, Derrick provides a compelling, verifiable advantage.
Which has better pricing: Derrick or Clay?
+
Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, whereas Clay charges per-use with stricter rate limits. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 100 credits, making it more accessible for testing. Clay's pricing scales quickly for high-volume enrichment, but Derrick's per-credit model combined with rollover flexibility and native Google Sheets integration typically results in lower total cost of ownership for most B2B sales teams, especially those with variable prospecting volumes.
Can Dux-Soup be replaced by Derrick or Clay?
+
Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Dux-Soup in many cases, and Clay in others, but with nuance. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and lead identification, yet its scope is LinkedIn-centric and can raise account risk due to platform terms. Derrick provides a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring, and broad integrations through Zapier/Make, all without LinkedIn automation and without required LinkedIn Navigator. Clay focuses on multi-source data enrichment and outbound workflows, which Derrick also covers but with a tighter, simpler setup in Sheets and monthly rollovers of credits. If your priority is LinkedIn-only prospecting, Dux-Soup may still be a fit, but for integrated prospecting, data enrichment, and compliant outreach at scale, Derrick often offers greater efficiency, cost savings, and ease of use, with Clay serving as a complementary data source when deeper enrichment is needed.
One-on-one
Dux-Soup vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Dux-Soup compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneClay vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Clay compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
