Published · Updated

Closely vs Expandi vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?

Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime

Short answer
Closely vs Expandi vs Derrick in short. Closely: multi-sender · Cloud-based · AI personalization. Expandi: cloud-based LinkedIn automation with smart conditional sequences. Derrick is a B2B enrichment web app (nothing to install), also available as a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). It is free forever with 100 credits/month, with paid plans from €20/month, and it runs on its own or alongside Closely or Expandi.

Where Closely bets on automating LinkedIn at scale, Derrick bets on owning the data BEFORE you ever touch LinkedIn. The side-by-side comparison below tracks Closely's account-ban risk, session-breakage downtime and post-action data export quality against Derrick's Sheets-native LinkedIn search and enrichment.

Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €20/mo
Setup Nothing to install
Where it lives Web app, plus Sheets, Claude, API

See the full comparison ↓

Trusted by Hands Down best extension for sheets till date. It eased up my linkedin lead collection journey by 10x. Thank you!! Rahul Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace This tool makes enriching LinkedIn URLs incredibly easy. You can enrich both personal and company profiles with a single click, and the Google Sheets integration is a game-changer. Pankaj Rohilla from Google Workspace Marketplace Great extension. There's bigger companies that do 1000x less. Go with Derrick. Ben Leinen from Google Workspace Marketplace It makes my life a lot easier… no more copy and paste and time wasted. Thank you! Cris Forlani from Google Workspace Marketplace Derrick is your one stop solution to data collection and up to date leads data automated collection. 100/100 value for money. Manu Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace This is one hell of a magical tool, it has blown my mind already, it's so handy, just love it. I am exploring how much more I can do with it Jagdip Gohil from Google Workspace Marketplace Loving the smoothness of the experience especially on Chrome. Great value for the price as well. GB Alao from Google Workspace Marketplace I was looking for a tool to enrich LinkedIn data. Very easy to use. Keith Hildebrand from Google Workspace Marketplace Easy to enhance contacts by running bulk lists. Try it James Finlayson from Google Workspace Marketplace +34,000 others
Part 1 / 10

Quick facts

Closely vs Expandi vs Derrick at a glance

Closely

  • Starting price: $29 annual / $49 monthly per sender (flat $29 annual across all advertised tiers, old $17 at 6+ senders ELIMINATED 2026)
  • Free plan: 14-day trial, no credit card
  • Founded: 2021
  • HQ: Limassol, Cyprus (per Crunchbase ; closelyhq.com hides HQ)
4.6/5 G2 4.4/5 Capterra

Expandi

  • Starting price: $79/mo (Business, annual) · 14-day free trial
  • Free plan: 14-day free trial (no credit card)
  • Founded: 2019
  • HQ: Eindhoven, Netherlands
4.2/5 G2 4.4/5 Capterra

Derrick

Recommended
  • Starting price: Free · Paid from €20/mo
  • Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
  • Founded: 2022
  • HQ: Marseille, FR
4.8/5 G2 4.8/5 Capterra
Part 2 / 10

Why Derrick wins

Why teams pick Derrick over Closely and Expandi

3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.

01

Web app, nothing to install · also in Sheets, Claude, API

If your B2B data ends up in Google Sheets anyway (most teams' do), running it through Closely or Expandi first means two unnecessary hops : platform → CSV → Sheets. Derrick removes both hops. One web app, nothing to install (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API), results in the next column. The unit-of-work shrinks from "run the export" to "enrich the list".

02

Free plan to start, then €20/month for 10,000 credits

Closely ($49/sender/month) and Expandi ($79/mo (Business, annual) · 14-day free trial) follow the SaaS-standard model : tier the features, cap the credits, upsell when you outgrow it. Derrick works the other way round : one credit balance, six plans from 0 to 320 EUR a month, and unused credits roll over on the paid ones. Predictable spend for teams that hate budgeting around credit-pool refills.

03

Built for the 2026 AI stack : MCP-first enrichment

In 2026, AI agents need data tools they can call natively. Derrick speaks MCP out of the box - point Claude at your list, ask "enrich these 200 LinkedIn URLs with mobile numbers", done. Closely and Expandi need either a custom integration or a Zapier middleman for the same workflow.

Replace Closely: import leads from a Sales Navigator search in Derrick's web app, nothing to install
Part 3 / 10

Honest comparison

What each tool does better

We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Closely, Expandi, and Derrick each genuinely win.

What Closely does better

  • Cheapest per-sender at scale
  • Cloud-based: sequences run when your laptop's off
  • Bundled AI icebreakers actually work
Read full Closely review →

What Expandi does better

  • Smart conditional sequences (best in the cloud category)
  • Cloud-based with dedicated country IPs
  • Comprehensive LinkedIn feature set
Read full Expandi review →
Part 4 / 10

Real annual cost

True cost over 12 months

Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.

Cost item Closely Expandi Derrick
Starting price $29 annual / $49 monthly per sender (flat $29 annual across all advertised tiers, old $17 at 6+ senders ELIMINATED 2026) $79/mo (Business, annual) · 14-day free trial €0 (free) · €20/month paid
Annual cost (base) See pricing ~$948/yr €0/year free · €240/year on Standard
Free plan? 14-day trial, no credit card 14-day free trial (no credit card) ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo
Setup cost Hours to days Hours to days Nothing to install (web app)
Switching cost CSV export + retraining CSV export + retraining Zero - works alongside any stack

Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps it to one transparent credit model.

Part 5 / 10

Feature-by-feature

Closely vs Expandi vs Derrick: full feature comparison

Closely Derrick App Expandi
Entry price$29 annual / $49 monthly per sender (flat $29 annual across all advertised tiers, old $17 at 6+ senders ELIMINATED 2026)Free plan · from €20/month$79/mo (Business, annual) · 14-day free trial
Free plan14-day trial, no credit cardFree plan, 100 credits/monthYes (limited)
Typical useAgencies running 5+ LinkedIn accountsB2B enrichment (web app, Sheets, Claude, API)Established agencies + B2B teams running smart LinkedIn sequences
Category positioningLinkedIn outreach automationWeb app for B2B data (also Sheets, Claude, API)LinkedIn Automation (Cloud, Agency-Established)
Founded202120222019
Execution modelCloud-based (no Chrome extension)Web app, also Google Sheets, Claude (MCP), APICloud-based
Multi-account / agencyNative, up to 50+ sendersN/A - data layerPer-tier
LinkedIn detection riskCloud - slightly higher than Chrome-ext toolsN/AReal (despite safety claims)
Works natively in Google Sheets✕✓✕
Per-row pricing (credits roll over)✕✓✕
MCP-ready for AI / LLM agents✕✓✕
Part 6 / 10

Pricing in a nutshell

Closely vs Expandi vs Derrick pricing breakdown

LinkedIn outreach automation

Closely

$29 annual / $49 monthly per sender (flat $29 annual across all advertised tiers, old $17 at 6+ senders ELIMINATED 2026)

Best for: Agencies running 5+ LinkedIn accounts

Closely starts at $49/sender/month. LinkedIn outreach automation, with positioning around agencies running 5+ linkedin accounts. Full tier-by-tier breakdown including credit caps, seat economics, and hidden line items lives on the dedicated Closely pricing page.

LinkedIn Automation (Cloud, Agency-Established)

Expandi

$79/mo (Business, annual) · 14-day free trial

Best for: Established agencies + B2B teams running smart LinkedIn sequences

Expandi starts at $79/mo (Business, annual) · 14-day free trial. LinkedIn Automation (Cloud, Agency-Established), with positioning around established agencies + b2b teams running smart linkedin sequences. Full tier-by-tier breakdown including credit caps, seat economics, and hidden line items lives on the dedicated Expandi pricing page.

Part 7 / 10

Migration guide

How to switch from Closely to Derrick in 3 steps

Derrick is a web app - nothing to install, no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate. Sign up and you're enriching in under a minute.

Open the Derrick web app

Sign up on the Derrick web app. Nothing to install, no credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.

Import your Closely list

Upload the CSV you exported from Closely, paste LinkedIn URLs, or import from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Prefer to stay in your tools? The same features run in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API.

Enrich your list with one click

Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns in your list. No pipelines, no waiting.

Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime

Part 8 / 10

Decision in 60 seconds

Which one is right for you?

Pick Closely if…

  • You specifically need agencies running 5+ LinkedIn accounts
  • Cheapest per-sender at scale
  • Cloud-based: sequences run when your laptop's off
  • You're already invested in the Closely ecosystem
Read full Closely review →

Pick Expandi if…

  • You specifically need established agencies + B2B teams running smart LinkedIn sequences
  • Smart conditional sequences (best in the cloud category)
  • Cloud-based with dedicated country IPs
  • You're already invested in the Expandi ecosystem
Read full Expandi review →

Pick Derrick if…

  • You want B2B enrichment with nothing to install (web app, also in Sheets, Claude, API)
  • You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
  • You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
  • You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
Try Derrick free →
Part 9 / 10

Compare

Part 10 / 10

Keep exploring

Customer stories

What teams say after switching from Closely vs Expandi

See what our customers say about Derrick.

  • Rated 4.6 out of 5 on Trustpilot, 323 reviews
323 reviews

"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."

Alex Clark

Director | SaaS GTM Leader

Reviewed on Product Hunt

"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."

David Sire

Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage

Reviewed on Product Hunt

"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."

Etienne Grange

CEO Form'actions

Reviewed on Capterra

FAQ

Stop copying data around. Start enriching.

Closely vs Expandi: when does each fit best?

+
Closely is positioned as linkedin outreach automation for agencies running 5+ linkedin accounts. Expandi is positioned as linkedin automation (cloud, agency-established) for established agencies + b2b teams running smart linkedin sequences. Both compete in the LinkedIn outreach automation category, so the choice comes down to which usage profile your team matches most closely. Both are established products with real user bases, so the deciding factor is workflow fit, not product quality.

How do Closely and Expandi pricing actually compare in 2026?

+
Closely entry-paid tier : Starter (annual) at $29/sender/month. Next tier up is Starter (monthly) ($49/sender/month). Closely's free tier : 14-day trial, no credit card. Expandi entry-paid tier : Business at $79/mo (annual) / $99 monthly. Next tier up is Agency (10+ seats) (Custom). Expandi's free tier : 14-day free trial (no credit card). Worth noting : Derrick App, free to start and 20 EUR a month for 10,000 credits, is the simplest TCO answer: a web app, nothing to install, also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API.

What's the biggest reason to pick Closely over Expandi?

+
Per-sender pricing. Closely bills per LinkedIn sender, so the cost scales with the number of accounts you run; the old discount for 6+ senders was removed in 2026. That is the capability to test against your own list before it decides anything.

What's the biggest reason to pick Expandi over Closely?

+
Smart conditional sequences (best in the cloud category). Branching logic on connection accepted/rejected, message replied/not replied, profile viewed back, etc. - meaningfully more flexible than linear cadences in Dripify or Waalaxy. Power agencies build sophisticated multi-touch motions that adapt to prospect engagement. That is the difference to test against your own workflow before it decides anything.

Can Derrick replace both Closely and Expandi?

+
Both Closely and Expandi compete in the LinkedIn outreach automation category. Derrick is a data-first web app (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API) - it doesn't replace a full LinkedIn outreach automation platform feature-for-feature, but it eliminates the data + spreadsheet layer that teams typically use alongside Closely or Expandi. For teams whose primary need is enrichment + list-building, Derrick covers 60-80% of typical LinkedIn outreach automation stack workflows on a credit plan that opens at 20 EUR a month for 10,000 credits. For teams running heavy LinkedIn outreach automation feature surface (sequencer, dialer, AI agents), Derrick complements rather than replaces.

Beyond Closely and Expandi, what other tools should I evaluate?

+
Four other tools in the same competitive set worth evaluating : HeyReach, Dripify, Waalaxy, Apollo. Each has its own positioning trade-off versus Closely and Expandi - HeyReach sits closest to them on the same use case, with Dripify, Waalaxy, Apollo as adjacent picks for different team sizes or use cases. Cross-reference each tool's standalone review for the trade-off detail that matters to your team's specific stack.