Hunter
- Starting price: Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence
- Founded: 2015
- HQ: Wilmington, DE (US entity) - team distributed (Paris, remote-first)
Hunter competes on hit rate, accuracy and waterfall fallback when one source is blank. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Hunter's per-find cost (email vs mobile vs direct-dial), real-world deliverability of what comes back, and how it fits into Derrick's 10-source waterfall enrichment workflow.
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.





CURSOR 3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
Hunter excels at email discovery and verification, but its enrichment depth and real-time validation outside LinkedIn are limited. TexAu focuses on text automation and bulk augmentation, not comprehensive, real-time data validation or multi-attribute prospect enrichment. Derrick solves this by delivering real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes directly within 100% native Google Sheets, removing LinkedIn limits. This reduces bounce risk and speeds prospecting, with credits that are reportable for ongoing efficiency.
No-code setup in minutes, not hours, with API flexibility. Hunter struggles with depth beyond email discovery, lacking multi-dimensional enrichment and flexible API-driven workflows, while TexAu focuses on writing automation rather than integrated prospecting. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets experience that eliminates CSV exports and complex configs, enabling rapid, no-code setups and scalable API integrations (3000+ via Zapier/Make/n8n). This translates to measurable time savings and faster go-to-market, with re-usable credit-based actions and real-time enrichment across 50+ attributes per contact. Derrick keeps setup simple and flexible, so teams deploy in minutes and adapt as needs evolve.
Hunter and TexAu show limits in unified workflows and data governance, with Hunter focusing on email discovery rather than multi-dimensional enrichment and TexAu excelling at writing automation but lacking full workflow management. Derrick offers a 100% native Google Sheets platform that centralizes prospecting data, governance, and collaboration without exporting to external tools. Teams gain measurable efficiency, saving up to 5-10 hours per user per month while maintaining a single source of truth across roles. A practical use: standardized lead scoring and segmentations are applied consistently, reducing misalignment between sales, marketing, and ops.
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Hunter, TexAu, and Derrick each genuinely win.
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Hunter | TexAu | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual) | Free 14-day trial · Solo $79/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€600/yr | ~€168/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence | 14-day free trial (no credit card) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
| hunter | Derrick App | TexAu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
Email Finder + Light Outreach Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
Best for: Solo SDRs and small teams doing email-first outbound
Hunter offers affordable entry-level pricing with a free tier for basic email search and verification, plus paid plans scaling by credits; see full pricing breakdown for all details and plan limits. View complete pricing details to compare options.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Cloud Automation Platform (Spices + Recipes) Free 14-day trial · Solo $79/mo (annual)
Best for: Growth hackers + automation enthusiasts on a budget
TexAu offers a beginner-friendly entry price with a free tier and paid plans starting at affordable monthly rates; full pricing details are available on the dedicated Pricing TexAu page-see the full breakdown for exact tiers and limits.
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Hunter, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
Drop the third-party context and see how hunter compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneDrop the third-party context and see how TexAu compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackStep back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation →