Hunter
- Starting price: Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence
- Founded: 2015
- HQ: Wilmington, DE (US entity) - team distributed (Paris, remote-first)
Updated
Hunter vs Adapt.io vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Hunter vs Adapt.io vs Derrick: Hunter is a email finder, verifier and lightweight cold-email platform, Adapt.io is a b2b contact database + linkedin chrome extension with 150m+ contacts. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Hunter or Adapt.io) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Hunter or Adapt.io for outreach.
Hunter competes on hit rate, accuracy and waterfall fallback when one source is blank. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Hunter's per-find cost (email vs mobile vs direct-dial), real-world deliverability of what comes back, and how it fits into Derrick's 10-source waterfall enrichment workflow.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Hunter vs Adapt.io vs Derrick at a glance
Adapt.io
- Starting price: Free 25 credits/mo · Starter $49/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 25 email + 25 enrichment credits/mo permanently
- Founded: 2016
- HQ: Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Hunter and Adapt.io
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Enrich data fully in Sheets without external tools
Derrick enables fully enriched data directly in Google Sheets, unlike Hunter and Adapt.io which primarily focus on basic email finding or generic automation and lack end-to-end sheet-native enrichment. While Hunter excels at locating emails, it offers limited multi-attribute enrichment and no native Sheets workflow, and Adapt.io specializes in connectors rather than comprehensive in-sheet data augmentation. Derrick solves this by turning Sheets into a complete prospecting hub with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and credits that stay usable month-to-month. Use cases like live account profiling and instant scoring within Sheets demonstrate concrete time savings and improved data quality without leaving the spreadsheet.
02 No-code workflows for advanced data enrichment beyond basics
Hunter and Adapt.io primarily offer basic enrichment paths or limited no-code automation, leaving advanced data enrichment without multi-tool workarounds. Derrick differentiates by delivering no-code workflows inside 100% native Google Sheets, enabling complex enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and AI-driven scoring, segmentation, and summaries. This translates to measurable gains, such as saving 5-10 hours per month and reducing reliance on external tools. In practice, Derrick unifies data enrichment, validation, and firmographic insights directly where prospection happens, avoiding CSV exports or external pivots.
03 Real-time data quality without latency for everyone
Hunter and Adapt.io often struggle with real-time data quality due to latency and limited live validation capabilities. Derrick delivers truly real-time data quality directly within 100% native Google Sheets, avoiding export delays and external tool latencies. Users gain instant accuracy across 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, with real-time email validation to improve deliverability and immediate scoring, saving 5–10 hours/month. For quick use cases, Derrick’s no-code workflow and instant feedback loops mean teams can act on fresh data without waiting for batch refreshes.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Hunter, Adapt.io, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Hunter does better
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- Strong free tier + simple onboarding
What Adapt.io does better
- High G2 score (4.6/5 across 2,789 reviews)
- Robust filtering + clean Chrome extension UX
- Genuinely usable free tier
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Hunter | Adapt.io | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual) | Free 25 credits/mo · Starter $49/mo | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€600/yr | ~€300/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence | Yes - 25 email + 25 enrichment credits/mo permanently | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Hunter vs Adapt.io vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| hunter | Derrick App | Adapt.io | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Email Finder + Light Outreach derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
B2B Contact Database + Chrome Extension
Hunter vs Adapt.io vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Email Finder + Light Outreach Hunter
Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
Best for: Solo SDRs and small teams doing email-first outbound
Hunter offers starter pricing with a free tier (credits-based) and paid plans starting at a modest monthly rate; for exact tiers, limits, and renewals, see full pricing breakdown. View complete pricing details on the dedicated Hunter pricing page.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
B2B Contact Database + Chrome Extension Adapt.io
Free 25 credits/mo · Starter $49/mo
Best for: Solo SDRs + small teams needing affordable B2B contact data
Adapt.io offers approachable pricing with a competitive entry point and a free tier for light usage, followed by scalable paid plans; see the full pricing breakdown for all details and plan specifics. View complete pricing details on the Adapt.io pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Hunter to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Hunter, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Hunter if…
- You specifically need solo sdrs and small teams doing email-first outbound
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- You're already invested in the Hunter ecosystem
Pick Adapt.io if…
- You specifically need solo sdrs + small teams needing affordable b2b contact data
- High G2 score (4.6/5 across 2,789 reviews)
- Robust filtering + clean Chrome extension UX
- You're already invested in the Adapt.io ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Hunter vs Adapt.io
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is Derrick vs Hunter better for email enrichment?
+
For email enrichment specifically, Hunter excels as a dedicated email discovery and verification tool with strong accuracy rates and a streamlined interface focused solely on finding valid business emails. However, Derrick offers a more integrated approach by combining email validation with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company, all natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports or external platforms. While Hunter specializes narrowly in email accuracy, Derrick provides broader prospect intelligence alongside real-time email verification, making it better suited for teams needing comprehensive data enrichment beyond just email addresses.
Is Derrick a strong alternative to Adapt.io?
+
Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Adapt.io, particularly if your team works primarily in Google Sheets. While Adapt.io excels as a workflow automation platform for data integration, Derrick offers a more specialized B2B enrichment solution native to Google Sheets with no exports needed. Derrick provides fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact and company, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. Unlike Adapt.io's general-purpose automation focus, Derrick's strength lies in streamlining prospecting workflows directly within your existing spreadsheet environment, saving five to ten hours monthly while maintaining rollover credits and requiring no credit card for the free tier.
Derrick vs Hunter vs Adapt.io: which has better pricing?
+
Pricing varies significantly across these platforms. Hunter operates on a subscription model with tiered plans based on search volume and features, while Adapt.io offers usage-based pricing for data enrichment. Derrick provides the most flexible approach with rollover credits starting at zero euros for the free tier, no credit card required, and monthly plans from nine euros. Derrick's rollover credits mean unused allocations carry forward, eliminating waste. For teams prioritizing cost efficiency and flexibility, Derrick's transparent credit system and lower entry barrier make it particularly competitive against both Hunter's email-focused subscriptions and Adapt.io's integration pricing model.
What’s the Derrick vs Hunter difference in features?
+
Derrick differs from Hunter in that it’s 100% native to Google Sheets and focuses on complete, no-code prospecting within a familiar spreadsheet environment, while Hunter specializes in email discovery and verification with limited enrichment beyond basic company data. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation to boost deliverability, and AI-driven scoring, segmentation, and summaries, all within Google Sheets. It also provides extensive automation via 3000+ integrations and credits that roll over, plus a free tier with no credit card required. In contrast, Hunter excels at finding and verifying emails with strong accuracy and a clean workflow, but its data enrichment depth and multi-channel prospect profiling are more limited. If you need a holistic, sheet-based enrichment stack with embedded AI and flexible pricing, Derrick has clear advantages; for pure email discovery speed and accuracy, Hunter remains strong. Adapt.io presents a broader no-code automation angle, but Derrick’s native sheet integration and comprehensive enrichment make it a more focused fit for B2B prospecting teams.
Does Hunter offer better pricing than Adapt.io or Derrick?
+
Hunter's pricing is competitive but doesn't necessarily offer better value than Adapt.io or Derrick depending on your needs. Hunter excels at email discovery with straightforward per-credit pricing, while Adapt.io focuses on workflow automation with different cost structures. Derrick stands apart by offering rollover credits monthly with no credit card required for the free tier, plus 50+ enrichment attributes and integrated AI scoring all within Google Sheets. If you prioritize email-only prospecting, Hunter is solid, but for comprehensive enrichment with flexibility and cost efficiency, Derrick's native Sheets integration and rollover credits provide better long-term value without vendor lock-in.
What review differences exist between Derrick and Adapt.io?
+
What review differences exist between Derrick and Adapt.io? Derrick is praised for its native Google Sheets integration, turnkey prospecting inside Sheets, and a strong emphasis on accessibility through a no-code workflow that doesn’t require exporting CSVs or complex setup. Reviewers highlight its 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring and segmentation via Claude and ChatGPT. Adapt.io earns kudos for intuitive UI, reliable data appending, and solid API performance for mid-market use. However, Derrick often stands out in reviews for offering end-to-end Google Sheets-centric workflows, large library of connectors, monthly rolling credits, and flexible free tier without credit card, which can translate to faster onboarding and cost control compared to Adapt.io’s emphasis on broader integration depth and standard enrichment. In short, if your priority is seamless Sheets-based enrichment and AI-driven insights with predictable credits, Derrick tends to be preferred; if you need broad, no-code automation with strong connector depth, Adapt.io remains a solid alternative, though it may require supplementary tools for advanced enrichment.
One-on-one
hunter vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how hunter compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneAdapt.io vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Adapt.io compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
