Hunter
- Starting price: Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence
- Founded: 2015
- HQ: Wilmington, DE (US entity) - team distributed (Paris, remote-first)
Updated
Hunter vs Leadfeeder vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Hunter vs Leadfeeder vs Derrick: Hunter is a email finder, verifier and lightweight cold-email platform, Leadfeeder is a website visitor identification platform - now part of dealfront after april 2023 merger. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Hunter or Leadfeeder) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Hunter or Leadfeeder for outreach.
Hunter competes on hit rate, accuracy and waterfall fallback when one source is blank. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Hunter's per-find cost (email vs mobile vs direct-dial), real-world deliverability of what comes back, and how it fits into Derrick's 10-source waterfall enrichment workflow.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Hunter vs Leadfeeder vs Derrick at a glance
Leadfeeder
- Starting price: Free Lite forever · Visitor ID from €99/mo
- Free plan: Yes - Lite plan free forever (100 companies/mo)
- Founded: 2012 (merged with Echobot in 2022 via Great Hill Partners €180M deal ; Dealfront brand launched April 2023)
- HQ: Helsinki, Finland (with Karlsruhe, Germany office)
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Hunter and Leadfeeder
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Real-time validation and 100% native Sheets, without CSV exports
Hunter delivers email discovery and verification but relies on external enrichment, not real-time validation inside native Sheets. Leadfeeder shows website visitors but lacks full, in-Sheets data fidelity and CSV-free workflows. Derrick solves this by providing real-time validation and 100% native Google Sheets integration with no CSV exports, keeping all data updated directly in Sheets. By eliminating CSV handoffs, Derrick saves 5-10 hours per month for teams, while ensuring immediate accuracy across 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. This in-Sheets approach accelerates prospecting with instant scoring and segmentation right where teams collaborate.
02 Ultra-fast setup with no training or credit card required
Derrick offers an ultra-fast setup that requires no training and no credit card, a stark contrast to hunter and Leadfeeder, which often demand onboarding steps or paid commitments to unlock full capabilities. Unlike hunter’s single-focus email discovery and Leadfeeder’s website-visitor model, Derrick turns Google Sheets into a complete prospecting hub with 100% native Sheets integration. This means you can start enriching and prospecting immediately in the tools you already use, saving 5-10 hours per month. No credit card for the free tier and instant access to multi-attribute enrichment accelerates quick wins for new teams.
03 Deeper firmographic insights without extra tools needed
Hunter and Leadfeeder provide basic firmographic signals, but struggle with depth and real-time enrichment without adding more tools. Derrick delivers deeper firmographic insights directly in Sheets, without exporting or integrating external data sources. Users gain richer company profiles (50+ attributes) and AI-powered scoring, reducing research time by up to 40% and freeing up hours for strategic outreach. Derrick’s native Google Sheets experience means instant, actionable intelligence at the point of prospecting.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Hunter, Leadfeeder, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Hunter does better
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- Strong free tier + simple onboarding
What Leadfeeder does better
- Best-in-class visitor identification UX
- Strong CRM integrations + EU compliance posture
- Free Lite tier + 14-day full trial
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Hunter | Leadfeeder | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual) | Free Lite forever · Visitor ID from €99/mo | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€600/yr | ~€1,188/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence | Yes - Lite plan free forever (100 companies/mo) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Hunter vs Leadfeeder vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| hunter | Derrick App | Leadfeeder | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 99$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Email Finder + Light Outreach derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Website Visitor Identification (now Dealfront)
Hunter vs Leadfeeder vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Email Finder + Light Outreach Hunter
Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
Best for: Solo SDRs and small teams doing email-first outbound
Hunter pricing starts with a free tier and paid plans from $29-$39/month (exact tiers vary by features and credits) with a detailed pricing breakdown available-see full pricing breakdown for details.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Website Visitor Identification (now Dealfront) Leadfeeder
Free Lite forever · Visitor ID from €99/mo
Best for: Mid-market B2B teams generating leads from website traffic
Leadfeeder pricing scales with usage, offering an entry-level plan and paid tiers that grow with site traffic and CRM integration needs. For full details, see the pricing page and complete breakdown.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Hunter to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Hunter, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Hunter if…
- You specifically need solo sdrs and small teams doing email-first outbound
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- You're already invested in the Hunter ecosystem
Pick Leadfeeder if…
- You specifically need mid-market b2b teams generating leads from website traffic
- Best-in-class visitor identification UX
- Strong CRM integrations + EU compliance posture
- You're already invested in the Leadfeeder ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Hunter vs Leadfeeder
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the main difference between Derrick and hunter versus Leadfeeder?
+
Derrick, Hunter, and Leadfeeder serve fundamentally different purposes in your prospecting stack. Hunter specializes purely in email discovery and verification, while Leadfeeder focuses exclusively on identifying anonymous website visitors. Derrick operates as a comprehensive B2B data enrichment platform native to Google Sheets, offering fifty-plus attributes per contact and company without requiring external tools or CSV exports. Unlike Hunter's email-only approach or Leadfeeder's visitor-tracking limitation, Derrick combines real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no upfront payment required, making it ideal for teams seeking integrated enrichment directly within their existing spreadsheet workflows.
Is Derrick a better alternative to hunter for teams?
+
Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Hunter depends on your team's specific needs. Hunter excels as a specialized email finder with high verification accuracy, making it ideal if email discovery is your primary focus. However, Derrick offers broader capabilities as a native Google Sheets platform with fifty-plus enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring, real-time email validation, and rollover credits. If your team needs comprehensive prospect enrichment beyond email alone while working directly in Google Sheets without complex integrations, Derrick provides more flexibility and cost efficiency, particularly for teams already using spreadsheets for pipeline management.
Derrick vs hunter vs Leadfeeder: which is best overall?
+
The best choice depends on your specific needs. Hunter excels at email discovery and verification with high accuracy, making it ideal for teams focused purely on finding valid business emails. Leadfeeder specializes in website visitor identification and account intelligence, perfect for companies with strong web traffic looking to identify anonymous prospects. Derrick stands out as a comprehensive solution native to Google Sheets, offering 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits-all without requiring external platforms or CSV exports. For teams seeking an all-in-one prospecting hub that eliminates manual data work and integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, Derrick delivers superior flexibility and cost efficiency compared to specialized single-purpose tools.
How do hunter and Leadfeeder compare for pricing?
+
When comparing pricing, Hunter and Leadfeeder price primarily by seats or usage tiers with add-ons for bulk actions or enrichment, which can scale quickly for growing teams. Hunter focuses on email discovery with predictable per-seat or usage-based costs, while Leadfeeder prices based on website traffic and feature tiers, which can rise with higher visit volumes. Derrick, by contrast, offers a clear credits-based model (free 100 credits, then scalable packs) inside Google Sheets, with no credit card required for the free tier, plus transferable credits and 50+ enrichment attributes, often providing cost predictability and easier budgeting for teams already using Sheets. This can reduce total cost of ownership when you need multi-attribute enrichment without complex integrations.
Is Leadfeeder a good review vs Derrick features?
+
Leadfeeder specializes in identifying anonymous website visitors and converting them into leads, which works well if you have significant incoming traffic. However, it lacks comprehensive contact enrichment and often delivers leads with incomplete information like missing emails or phone numbers. Derrick takes a different approach by enriching your existing prospect lists directly within Google Sheets with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring-all without leaving your spreadsheet. While Leadfeeder excels at visitor identification, Derrick provides deeper firmographic data, verified contact information, and automation capabilities that make prospecting more efficient and complete.
Can Derrick replace both hunter and Leadfeeder effectively?
+
Derrick cannot fully replace both Hunter and Leadfeeder in all scenarios, but it can cover key gaps and reduce the need for multiple tools. For email discovery and verification, Hunter’s strength is strong accuracy and simple outreach workflows, whereas Derrick adds value with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and native Google Sheets integration-eliminating CSV exports and saving time. For website visitor intelligence, Leadfeeder shines in identifying anonymous visitors and routing leads, while Derrick enhances prospect profiling within Sheets with AI-powered scoring and segmentation, plus extensive integrations and roll-over credits. If your needs include deep firmographic data, real-time intent signals, and robust multi-channel enrichment, you’ll likely still pair Derrick with either Hunter or Leadfeeder. However, Derrick can often reduce complexity, streamline workflows, and improve data quality within a single, familiar environment.
One-on-one
hunter vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how hunter compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneLeadfeeder vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Leadfeeder compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
