Published · Updated

Apollo vs Cognism vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?

Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime

Short answer
Apollo vs Cognism vs Derrick in short. Apollo: B2B sales intelligence and outreach. Cognism: GDPR-compliant B2B contact data with mobile coverage. Derrick is a B2B enrichment web app (nothing to install), also available as a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). It is free forever with 100 credits/month, with paid plans from €20/month, and it runs on its own or alongside Apollo or Cognism.

Apollo is a B2B database vendor - seat-time + record access charged per user, per year. The side-by-side comparison below tracks Apollo's total-cost-of-ownership across team growth and lookup volume against Derrick's credit-pool model where the cost moves with usage, not headcount.

Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €20/mo
Setup Nothing to install
Where it lives Web app, plus Sheets, Claude, API

See the full comparison ↓

Trusted by Hands Down best extension for sheets till date. It eased up my linkedin lead collection journey by 10x. Thank you!! Rahul Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace This tool makes enriching LinkedIn URLs incredibly easy. You can enrich both personal and company profiles with a single click, and the Google Sheets integration is a game-changer. Pankaj Rohilla from Google Workspace Marketplace Great extension. There's bigger companies that do 1000x less. Go with Derrick. Ben Leinen from Google Workspace Marketplace It makes my life a lot easier… no more copy and paste and time wasted. Thank you! Cris Forlani from Google Workspace Marketplace Derrick is your one stop solution to data collection and up to date leads data automated collection. 100/100 value for money. Manu Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace This is one hell of a magical tool, it has blown my mind already, it's so handy, just love it. I am exploring how much more I can do with it Jagdip Gohil from Google Workspace Marketplace Loving the smoothness of the experience especially on Chrome. Great value for the price as well. GB Alao from Google Workspace Marketplace I was looking for a tool to enrich LinkedIn data. Very easy to use. Keith Hildebrand from Google Workspace Marketplace Easy to enhance contacts by running bulk lists. Try it James Finlayson from Google Workspace Marketplace +34,000 others

Quick facts01 / 10

Apollo vs Cognism vs Derrick at a glance

Apollo

  • Starting price: Free / $49 annual or $65 monthly /seat (post-2026 price increase)
  • Free plan: Yes (Free forever)
  • Founded: 2015
  • HQ: San Francisco, CA
4.7/5 G2 4.5/5 Capterra

Cognism

  • Starting price: See pricing
  • Free plan: No (demo + custom quote only)
  • Founded: 2015
  • HQ: London, United Kingdom
4.6/5 G2 4.7/5 Capterra

Derrick

Recommended
  • Starting price: Free · Paid from €20/mo
  • Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
  • Founded: 2022
  • HQ: Marseille, FR
4.8/5 G2 4.8/5 Capterra

Why Derrick wins02 / 10

Why teams pick Derrick over Apollo and Cognism

3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.

01

Real-time validation without data gaps in enrichment

Derrick delivers real-time validation within enrichment, addressing gaps that Apollo and Cognism struggle to close in every record. While Apollo and Cognism offer data accuracy, users often encounter outdated or incomplete records during rapid prospecting, leaving gaps in profiles. Derrick ensures real-time validation directly in the web app (or in Google Sheets, Claude and the API), reducing false positives and ensuring each enriched contact is verifiable the moment it’s appended. This results in measurable gains like faster list readiness and improved deliverability, with credits remaining usable across workflows.

02

Cost-effective, flexible integrations for diverse workflows

Apollo and Cognism focus on data quality, but their native workflows often require rigid setups or additional tools for broad integration, limiting flexibility in diverse processes. Derrick delivers cost-effective, web app enrichment (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API) with 3000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, eliminating CSV exports and complex config. Teams save time and money, with measurable gains like 5-10h/month in manual effort and reusable credits across workflows. A typical use case: seamless, scalable prospecting without leaving the web app or Sheets or paying for separate data enrichment suites. Derrick converts flexible integrations into tangible ROI for varied workflows.

03

Unified AI-driven scoring for precise prioritization

Apollo and Cognism provide strong data and verification, but they fall short on unified AI-driven scoring that translates into precise prioritization across channels and workflows. Derrick combines integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time validation to deliver a single, scoring-driven view that auto-prioritizes prospects. This yields measurable efficiency, reducing time-to-prioritize by up to 30% and boosting conversion-ready leads by a reported 15-25% in rapid test scenarios. With Derrick, score cohorts update dynamically as new signals emerge, enabling actionable prioritization without leaving the web app or Google Sheets.

Replace Apollo: find a verified email from a LinkedIn profile in Derrick's web app, nothing to install

Honest comparison03 / 10

What each tool does better

We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Apollo, Cognism, and Derrick each genuinely win.

Real annual cost04 / 10

True cost over 12 months

Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.

Cost item Apollo Cognism Derrick
Starting price Free / $49 annual or $65 monthly /seat (post-2026 price increase) See pricing €0 (free) · €20/month paid
Annual cost (base) See pricing See pricing €0/year free · €108/year on Mini
Free plan? Yes (Free forever) No (demo + custom quote only) ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo
Setup cost Hours to days Hours to days Nothing to install (web app)
Switching cost CSV export + retraining CSV export + retraining Zero - works alongside any stack

Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps it to one transparent credit model.

Feature-by-feature05 / 10

Apollo vs Cognism vs Derrick: full feature comparison

apollo Derrick App Cognism
Works natively in Google Sheets ✕ ✓ ✕
Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) ✕ ✕ ✕
Sales Navigator 1-click import ✓ ✓ ✕
Email finder with real-time validation ✓ ✓ ✓
Phone finder from LinkedIn ✓ ✓ ✓
Company tech stack lookup ✓ ✓ ✓
SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated ✕ ✓ ✕
AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) ✓ ✓ ✓
Automatic AI Lead Scoring ✓ ✓ ✕
Data cleaning & normalization ✓ ✓ ✕
Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) ✕ ✕ ✕
Zapier, Make, n8n integrations ✓ ✓ ✓
Public API available ✓ ✓ ✓
Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) ✓ ✕ ✓
Entry price (paid plan) Free / $49 annual or $65 monthly /seat (post-2026 price increase) Free plan · from €20/month See pricing
Permanent free plan ✓ ✓ ✕
Rollover credits to next month ✕ ✓ ✕
Simple and transparent credit system ✕ ✓ ✕
Simple setup & onboarding ✕ ✓ ✓
Complete documentation ✓ ✓ ✓

Pricing in a nutshell06 / 10

Apollo vs Cognism vs Derrick pricing breakdown

Migration guide07 / 10

How to switch from Apollo to Derrick in 3 steps

Derrick is a web app - nothing to install, no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate. Sign up and you're enriching in under a minute.

Open the Derrick web app

Sign up on the Derrick web app. Nothing to install, no credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.

Import your Apollo list

Upload the CSV you exported from Apollo, paste LinkedIn URLs, or import from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Prefer to stay in your tools? The same features run in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API.

Enrich your list with one click

Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns in your list. No pipelines, no waiting.

Try the app free
or use it in
Google Sheets
Claude
API

100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime

Decision in 60 seconds08 / 10

Which one is right for you?

Pick Apollo if…

  • You specifically need SMB & mid-market outbound
  • Massive 250M+ contact database
  • All-in-one stack at SMB price
  • You're already invested in the Apollo ecosystem
Read full Apollo review →

Pick Cognism if…

  • You specifically need EU/EMEA enterprise sales
  • Best EU mobile-phone coverage
  • GDPR-compliant by design
  • You're already invested in the Cognism ecosystem
Read full Cognism review →

Pick Derrick if…

  • You want B2B enrichment with nothing to install (web app, also in Sheets, Claude, API)
  • You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
  • You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
  • You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
Try Derrick free →

Compare09 / 10

Keep exploring10 / 10

Customer stories

What teams say after switching from Apollo vs Cognism

See what our customers say about Derrick.

  • Rated 4.6 out of 5 on Trustpilot, 323 reviews
323 reviews

"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."

Alex Clark

Director | SaaS GTM Leader

Reviewed on Product Hunt

"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."

David Sire

Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage

Reviewed on Product Hunt

"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."

Etienne Grange

CEO Form'actions

Reviewed on Capterra

FAQ

Stop copying data around. Start enriching.

Is Derrick better than Apollo for data enrichment and automation?

+
Derrick and Apollo serve different enrichment philosophies. Apollo focuses on scale with its 250 million contact database and multi-channel outreach, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting. However, Derrick offers superior automation efficiency through native web app, Google Sheets, Claude (MCP) and API integration, eliminating CSV exports and manual workflows that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick's AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT provides deeper data intelligence, while Apollo focuses on breadth. For teams prioritizing data quality, workflow efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for free tier offer more flexibility than Apollo's rigid pricing structure.

How does Derrick compare to Cognism in pricing?

+
Derrick offers significantly more flexible pricing than Cognism, with plans starting at just €20 monthly for ten thousand credits, compared to Cognism's enterprise-focused premium tiers. Derrick's credits roll over monthly, meaning unused credits aren't lost, whereas Cognism operates on standard monthly billing cycles. Additionally, Derrick requires no credit card for its free tier with 100 credits, while Cognism typically demands upfront payment. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick delivers comparable data enrichment capabilities at a fraction of Cognism's cost, with integrated AI features and web app functionality (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API) that eliminates expensive add-ons like LinkedIn Sales Navigator.

Derrick vs Apollo vs Cognism: which wins on features?

+
Derrick wins on workflow efficiency by operating natively in the web app (or in Google Sheets, Claude and the API), eliminating the need for CSV exports or external platforms that Apollo and Cognism require. While Apollo focuses on database scale and Cognism at data accuracy, Derrick uniquely combines fifty-plus enrichment attributes with integrated AI scoring using both Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and three-thousand-plus integrations via Zapier provide superior flexibility. For teams prioritizing streamlined prospecting without technical complexity, Derrick delivers the most practical feature combination, particularly when combined with Apollo's database strength or Cognism's intent signals.

Is Apollo a good alternative to Derrick for outreach?

+
Yes, Apollo can be a good alternative to Derrick for outreach, especially if your team prioritizes a large, fast-moving contact database, multi-channel outreach, and strong CRM integrations. Apollo focuses on scale with verified emails and broad reach, which supports rapid pipeline building. However, Derrick offers unique advantages that may matter for some teams: native web app, Google Sheets, Claude (MCP) and API integration (no CSV exports or complex setup), roll-over credits, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring and segmentation within the web app or a familiar spreadsheet workflow. If you want a high-volume outbound engine with easy, no-code enrichment directly in the web app (or in Sheets, Claude and the API), Derrick complements Apollo by boosting automation efficiency and data quality, whereas Cognism emphasizes data accuracy and intent signals for enterprise batching.

How does Cognism compare to Apollo for accuracy and pricing?

+
Cognism and Apollo both focus on contact accuracy, but they target different segments. Apollo prioritizes scale and speed with its 250 million contact database, while Cognism focuses on data quality and intent signals, particularly in EMEA markets. Pricing-wise, Cognism positions itself as premium with enterprise-level features, whereas Apollo offers more flexible plans. However, neither integrates natively into Google Sheets without manual CSV workflows. Derrick complements both by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes directly in the web app (or in Sheets, Claude and the API), with rollover credits and no card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking streamlined, cost-effective enrichment without platform switching or complex integrations.

What’s the difference between Derrick and Cognism for enterprise users?

+
Derrick differs from Cognism for enterprise users in that it is a web app (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API), turning its web app (and Google Sheets) into a full prospecting hub without exports or complex setup, while Cognism focuses on verified contact data, intent signals, and account-based insights with strong GDPR/CCPA compliance. Derrick focuses on rapid, cost-efficient enrichment (50+ attributes per contact), real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and vast automation via 3000+ integrations, all while offering rollable credits and a free tier without credit card. For enterprises prioritizing quick, integrated outreach in the web app (or in Sheets, Claude and the API) and flexible budgeting, Derrick offers a more lightweight, scalable approach; Cognism remains strong for high-quality data, compliance, and intent-driven ABM but typically at a premium and with a different workflow focus.