Hunter
- Starting price: Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence
- Founded: 2015
- HQ: Wilmington, DE (US entity) - team distributed (Paris, remote-first)
Updated
Hunter vs Datanyze vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Hunter vs Datanyze vs Derrick: Hunter is a email finder, verifier and lightweight cold-email platform, Datanyze is a budget technographic data + contact finder chrome extension (now zoominfo subsidiary). Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Hunter or Datanyze) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Hunter or Datanyze for outreach.
Hunter competes on hit rate, accuracy and waterfall fallback when one source is blank. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Hunter's per-find cost (email vs mobile vs direct-dial), real-world deliverability of what comes back, and how it fits into Derrick's 10-source waterfall enrichment workflow.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 27 000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Hunter vs Datanyze vs Derrick at a glance
Datanyze
- Starting price: Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 10 credits/mo for 90 days (Nyze Lite)
- Founded: 2012 - acquired by ZoomInfo 2018
- HQ: San Mateo, CA (now part of ZoomInfo, Vancouver WA)
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Hunter and Datanyze
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Email + tech stack insights in one native Google Sheets workflow
Hunter excels at email discovery but falls short on delivering integrated tech stack insights within a single workflow, while Datanyze offers technographic data but struggles with real-time accuracy and depth at the contact level. Derrick solves this by turning Google Sheets into a native, end-to-end prospecting hub that combines email validation and rich tech-stack insights directly inside Sheets. This eliminates switching tools and saves 5-10 hours per month, with credits that carry over for ongoing campaigns. A quick use-case: enrich a contact row with verified email, current tech stack, and firmographic details in one live, auto-updating sheet.
02 Real-time data freshness with automated QA checks
Hunter and Datanyze struggle with real-time data freshness, often lagging in rapid market shifts and contact updates. Derrick differentiates by delivering automated QA checks that continuously validate freshness directly within Google Sheets, ensuring no stale records propagate. This approach reduces data bounce and improves deliverability criteria, translating to measurable risk reduction and faster campaign readiness. For example, Derrick’s real-time validation can cut stale-record risk by up to 30% and save 2–4 hours per week on manual audits.
03 No-code setup for full enrichment, 0 admin overhead
No-code setup means anyone can achieve full enrichment without hiring admins or juggling multiple tools, a hurdle often faced with hunter and Datanyze. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, eliminating CSV exports and complex Configs that hunter and Datanyze require to build comprehensive profiles. This translates to measurable efficiency gains: save 5-10 hours per month and maintain up-to-date enrichment across 50+ attributes per contact, all without administrative overhead. With Derrick, teams can rapidly scale outreach directly from Sheets, thanks to its no-code, all-in-one approach.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Hunter, Datanyze, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Hunter does better
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- Strong free tier + simple onboarding
What Datanyze does better
- Cheapest meaningful technographic + contact bundle
- Strong technographic intelligence (90%+ accuracy claim)
- Intuitive Chrome extension UX
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Hunter | Datanyze | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual) | Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual) | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€600/yr | ~€120/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence | Yes - 10 credits/mo for 90 days (Nyze Lite) | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Hunter vs Datanyze vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| hunter | Derrick App | Datanyze | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Email Finder + Light Outreach derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Technographic Data + Contact Finder (ZoomInfo Subsidiary)
Hunter vs Datanyze vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Email Finder + Light Outreach Hunter
Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
Best for: Solo SDRs and small teams doing email-first outbound
Hunter offers pricing with a starting plan and paid tiers, plus a clear page detailing all options and limits-see full pricing breakdown for complete details. Pricing details available on the dedicated page: view complete pricing details.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Technographic Data + Contact Finder (ZoomInfo Subsidiary) Datanyze
Free Lite (10 credits/mo) · Pro 1 $21/mo (annual)
Best for: Solo founders + small teams needing technographic data on a tight budget
Datanyze offers scalable pricing with a free tier for limited usage and paid plans starting at a low monthly entry price, with more details on volumes and enterprise options. For full breakdown and all options, see the pricing page.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Hunter to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Hunter, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Hunter if…
- You specifically need solo sdrs and small teams doing email-first outbound
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- You're already invested in the Hunter ecosystem
Pick Datanyze if…
- You specifically need solo founders + small teams needing technographic data on a tight budget
- Cheapest meaningful technographic + contact bundle
- Strong technographic intelligence (90%+ accuracy claim)
- You're already invested in the Datanyze ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Hunter vs Datanyze
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Derrick vs hunter: which offers better email accuracy and pricing?
+
Derrick and Hunter both prioritize email accuracy, but approach it differently. Hunter specializes purely in email discovery and verification with strong bounce-rate reduction, while Derrick offers real-time email validation alongside 50+ enrichment attributes per contact within Google Sheets-no exports needed. On pricing, Hunter's plans start higher with limited flexibility, whereas Derrick's credits roll over monthly starting at just $9 for 4,000 credits with no credit card required for the free tier. For teams seeking integrated enrichment beyond email alone, Derrick delivers better value by combining verified email with company intelligence and AI-powered segmentation in one native platform.
Is Derrick a solid alternative to hunter for outreach?
+
Yes, Derrick is a solid alternative to Hunter for outreach, though they serve slightly different needs. Hunter excels purely at email finding and verification with strong accuracy rates, making it ideal if email discovery is your only requirement. However, Derrick offers broader value for complete outreach workflows by combining email enrichment with 50+ contact and company attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and native Google Sheets functionality that eliminates manual exports. Unlike Hunter's email-only approach, Derrick provides comprehensive prospect profiling directly in your spreadsheet, making it better suited for teams wanting personalized, data-driven outreach without switching platforms or managing multiple tools.
Derrick vs hunter vs Datanyze: which is best for tech stacks?
+
Derrick excels for tech stack discovery when combined with Hunter or Datanyze, but offers a distinct advantage through native Google Sheets integration that eliminates CSV exports and complex workflows. While Datanyze specializes in technology detection and Hunter in email accuracy, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no card required for free tier. For teams building tech-focused prospect lists, Derrick's approach streamlines the entire workflow within Sheets, saving five to ten hours monthly compared to juggling multiple platforms.
How does hunter compare to Datanyze on data enrichment depth?
+
Hunter focuses on email discovery and verification with strong accuracy and ease of use, but its data enrichment depth remains limited to basic company information and professional profiles. Datanyze excels in technology and firmographic insights, yet its depth of contact-level data can lag and require supplementary sources for complete profiles. Derrick, by contrast, offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and native Google Sheets integration with AI-based scoring and segmentation, delivering deeper, actionable enrichment without exporting data or complex setup. This makes Derrick particularly compelling for teams needing holistic prospect profiles alongside outreach readiness.
Does Derrick replace both hunter and Datanyze for SMBs?
+
Derrick doesn't fully replace either platform, but it complements both effectively for SMBs. Hunter excels at email verification and accuracy, while Datanyze specializes in technology stack intelligence. Derrick operates differently as a Google Sheets-native enrichment hub that combines 50+ contact and company attributes with real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring. For SMBs, Derrick eliminates the need for external platforms and CSV exports, saving 5-10 hours monthly while offering rollover credits and no upfront payment requirements. The ideal approach layers Derrick with Hunter for email precision or Datanyze for tech-focused targeting, depending on your prospecting priority.
What are Derrick's pricing and review highlights versus hunter and Datanyze?
+
Derrick’s pricing is straightforward and credit-based, with a free tier offering 100 credits and scalable options (Small 4,000 credits for $9, Medium 10,000 for $20, Large 25,000 for $47.50, XL 100,000 for $175) and credits that roll over each month. In reviews, Derrick is praised for being 100% native to Google Sheets with no CSV exports or complex integrations, saving significant time, and offering real-time email validation and AI-sourced scoring and segmentation. By contrast, Hunter emphasizes accurate email discovery and verification with strong CRM integrations but limited enrichment depth and multi-step data beyond emails. Datanyze excels in tech stack and firmographic data with robust exports, yet often requires supplementary data for full contact profiles and can lag in real-time updates. Overall, Derrick positions itself as a cost-effective, all-in-one enrichment and prospecting workflow native to Sheets, distinct from Hunter’s email-first approach and Datanyze’s tech-intelligence focus.
One-on-one
hunter vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how hunter compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-oneDatanyze vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how Datanyze compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
