Hunter
- Starting price: Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
- Free plan: Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence
- Founded: 2015
- HQ: Wilmington, DE (US entity) - team distributed (Paris, remote-first)
Updated
Hunter vs Woodpecker vs Derrick: Which Is Better in 2026?
- Short answer
- Hunter vs Woodpecker vs Derrick: Hunter is a email finder, verifier and lightweight cold-email platform, Woodpecker is a cold email platform with deliverability focus and recently overhauled pay-as-you-go pricing. Derrick is a B2B enrichment platform with three surfaces - a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). Hit rates are noticeably higher (more emails + phone numbers returned per query than Hunter or Woodpecker) and pricing is lower - free forever with 100 credits/month, paid plans from €9/month. Most teams pair Derrick for the data layer with Hunter or Woodpecker for outreach.
Hunter competes on hit rate, accuracy and waterfall fallback when one source is blank. The side-by-side comparison below isolates Hunter's per-find cost (email vs mobile vs direct-dial), real-world deliverability of what comes back, and how it fits into Derrick's 10-source waterfall enrichment workflow.
Free plan Yes - 100 credits/mo
Starts at €9/mo
Setup time 30 seconds
Where it lives Google Sheets
✓ Free forever · ✓ No credit card · ✓ Cancel anytime · ✓ Your data stays in your Sheet
Trusted by 31,000+ users worldwide.
CURSOR Quick Facts
Hunter vs Woodpecker vs Derrick at a glance
Woodpecker
- Starting price: €35/mo (500 prospects, monthly) or €23/mo annual
- Free plan: Yes - free base plan + 14-day trial
- Founded: 2015
- HQ: Wrocław, Poland
Derrick
★ Recommended- Starting price: Free · Paid from €9/mo
- Free plan: Yes - 100 credits/mo permanent
- Founded: 2023
- HQ: Marseille, FR
Why Derrick wins 01
02
03
Why teams pick Derrick over Hunter and Woodpecker
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01 Real-time validation without email-only limits
Hunter focuses on email discovery and verification, not real-time, multi-attribute validation beyond email accuracy, while Woodpecker centers on outbound sequencing and deliverability rather than live data enrichment. Derrick delivers real-time validation across richer contact data without restricting validation to emails alone, directly inside 100% native Google Sheets. This reduces bounce risk and improves deliverability while saving time-customers report up to 5–10 hours per month gained. Use cases include instant accuracy checks during list building and instant scoring to refine outreach intent.
02 Automated multi-source enrichment without manual steps
Hunter and Woodpecker primarily support either email discovery or outreach execution, not automated multi-source enrichment. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets experience that automatically pulls and harmonizes data from multiple sources without manual steps. Teams save time and reduce data gaps, with measurable impact like 5-10 hours saved per month and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. For rapid use, Derrick’s integration-rich workflow updates prospect profiles in real time, eliminating manual post-processing.
03 Unified data quality with real-time AI-driven profiling without external tools
Derrick delivers unified data quality by real-time AI-driven profiling without external tools, addressing hunter and woodpecker’s limitations in multi-faceted enrichment. Unlike Hunter, which focuses on email discovery rather than comprehensive, up-to-date profiling, Derrick provides 50+ attributes per contact with integrated AI scoring and segmentation. This results in measurable gains: up to 20-30% faster targeting and higher deliverability due to real-time validation and consistent data quality, with credits usable across the platform. A practical use case is instant profile synthesis for ABM playbooks, reducing manual data stitching and enabling immediate campaign activation.
Honest Comparison 
derrick
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Hunter, Woodpecker, and Derrick each genuinely win.
What Hunter does better
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- Strong free tier + simple onboarding
What Woodpecker does better
- Best-in-class deliverability + inbox placement
- Free base plan + dramatic PAYG savings on annual
- Strong agency features + white-label panel
What Derrick does better
- Free forever - €0/mo with 100 credits permanent in Google Sheets
- 100+ data points per lead - verified emails, phones, LinkedIn, tech stack, SIRET
- Zero LinkedIn ban risk + real-time email verification built in
- Pair with any sequencer - LaGrowthMachine, Smartlead, Lemlist, HeyReach
Real Annual Cost
True cost over 12 months
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
| Hunter | Woodpecker | Derrick | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (monthly) | Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual) | €35/mo (500 prospects, monthly) or €23/mo annual | €0 (free) · €9/mo paid |
| Annual cost (base) | ~€600/yr | ~€420/yr | €0/yr free · ~€108/yr paid |
| Free plan? | Yes - 50 credits/mo, 500 recipients/sequence | Yes - free base plan + 14-day trial | ✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo |
| Setup cost | Hours to days | Hours to days | 30 seconds via Marketplace |
| Switching cost | CSV export + retraining | CSV export + retraining | Zero - works alongside any stack |
💡 Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps everything in one transparent tier.
Feature-by-Feature
Hunter vs Woodpecker vs Derrick: full feature comparison
| hunter | Derrick App | woodpecker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing in a nutshell Email Finder + Light Outreach derrick
best value for money
Results first.
Discover Derrick →
Cold Email Platform
Hunter vs Woodpecker vs Derrick pricing breakdown
Email Finder + Light Outreach Hunter
Free 50 credits/mo · Starter €34/mo (annual)
Best for: Solo SDRs and small teams doing email-first outbound
Hunter offers an entry-level plan with a free tier (credits-based) and paid options scale up by usage; a full pricing page with all details is available to review the exact tiers and limits - see full pricing breakdown for details.
Results first.
Complexity removed.
Free · Paid plans from €9/mo
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, directly in Google Sheets.
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
Cold Email Platform Woodpecker
€35/mo (500 prospects, monthly) or €23/mo annual
Best for: SDRs prioritizing deliverability + agency-friendly multichannel
Woodpecker offers straightforward email outreach pricing with a free tier and paid plans starting at accessible monthly credits; full details and plan options are available on the pricing page-see full pricing breakdown for specifics.
Migration Guide
How to switch from Hunter to Derrick in 3 steps
Derrick is a Google Workspace app - no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate, no engineering work. Add it to Google Sheets and you're enriching in under a minute.
1
~30 sec Install Derrick from Google Workspace Marketplace
Click the install button on our Marketplace listing and grant Google Sheets access. No credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
2
~30 sec Open any Google Sheet → Extensions → Derrick
Open a Sheet with your prospect list (paste a CSV from Hunter, scrape from LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or import from your CRM). Click Extensions → Derrick and the sidebar opens with all enrichment features ready to use.
3
~1 min Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns directly in your Sheet. No exports, no pipelines, no waiting.
Install Derrick free →
100 free credits / month · No credit card · Cancel anytime
Decision in 60 seconds
Which one is right for you?
Pick Hunter if…
- You specifically need solo sdrs and small teams doing email-first outbound
- Outstanding email accuracy + verification
- No charge if Hunter can't find it
- You're already invested in the Hunter ecosystem
Pick Woodpecker if…
- You specifically need sdrs prioritizing deliverability + agency-friendly multichannel
- Best-in-class deliverability + inbox placement
- Free base plan + dramatic PAYG savings on annual
- You're already invested in the Woodpecker ecosystem
Pick Derrick if…
- You want B2B enrichment directly in Google Sheets
- You need a usable free plan (100 credits/mo, no card)
- You don't want long contracts, lock-in, or sales calls
- You need 100+ data points per lead in one tool
What teams say after switching from Hunter vs Woodpecker
See what our customers say about Derrick.
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
AJ Alexander
Opportunity Prospector
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Derrick vs Hunter easier to use for startups?
+
Derrick offers a notably gentler learning curve for startups compared to Hunter and Woodpecker. Being 100% native to Google Sheets, Derrick requires zero technical setup or CSV exports, meaning your team can start prospecting immediately without complex configuration. Hunter demands understanding email discovery workflows and API integrations, while Woodpecker requires campaign architecture knowledge. Derrick's free tier with no credit card needed lets startups test functionality risk-free, and rollover credits mean you only pay for what you use monthly. For resource-constrained teams, this simplicity combined with integrated AI and email validation delivers faster time-to-value than competing platforms.
Is Derrick a better alternative to Hunter for data enrichment?
+
Derrick and Hunter serve different enrichment needs. Hunter excels purely at email finding and verification with strong accuracy rates, making it ideal if email discovery is your only priority. However, Derrick provides comprehensive data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact alongside real-time email validation, all natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports or complex setup. Derrick also includes integrated AI scoring, rollover credits, and eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, delivering broader prospect intelligence and workflow efficiency than Hunter's email-focused approach.
How does Derrick compare to Hunter for pricing and value?
+
Derrick offers significantly better value through its Google Sheets-native approach, eliminating costly exports and manual workflows that Hunter and Woodpecker require. While Hunter excels at email discovery alone, Derrick combines email verification, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI scoring in one seamless platform. Pricing-wise, Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without credit card requirements provide more flexibility than Hunter's traditional plans. For teams needing comprehensive enrichment beyond just email finding, Derrick delivers enterprise-grade capabilities at a fraction of the cost, particularly when factoring in time savings and eliminated tool stacking.
What’s the Derrick vs Hunter vs Woodpecker comparison overall?
+
Overall, Derrick stands out as a more integrated, data-rich enrichment platform compared to Hunter and Woodpecker when your goal is scalable prospecting within Google Sheets. Hunter excels at precise email discovery and verification, but it focuses primarily on contact data and lacks deep company insights or AI-driven segmentation. Woodpecker excels at automated outreach and deliverability, yet it offers limited data enrichment and no native multi-source intelligence. Derrick, by contrast, combines 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, built-in AI for scoring and summarization, and seamless 100% native Google Sheets operation with extensive integrations. For teams needing a holistic, enrichment-heavy workflow without exporting data or juggling tools, Derrick provides more comprehensive capabilities while still supporting efficient, sheet-centric outreach.
Hunter vs Woodpecker: which offers better email verification?
+
Hunter excels at email discovery with high verification accuracy and a clean interface, making it ideal for finding valid business emails at scale. Woodpecker, however, focuses primarily on cold email automation and outreach sequencing rather than verification itself, so it's not directly comparable for email validation needs. If email verification is your priority, Hunter delivers superior accuracy and dedicated verification features. That said, Derrick offers real-time email validation integrated directly into Google Sheets alongside 50+ enrichment attributes, eliminating the need for separate tools while keeping everything native to your workflow without CSV exports or complex setup.
Does Derrick replace both Hunter and Woodpecker for teams?
+
Derrick does not strictly replace Hunter and Woodpecker for teams, but it can cover their gaps in a single platform. Hunter specializes in accurate email discovery and verification, which Derrick complements with real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and AI-driven scoring within a native Google Sheets workflow. Woodpecker focuses on outbound sequencing and deliverability; Derrick adds deeper data enrichment, multi-step scoring, and seamless integrations without CSV exports. For teams seeking a holistic prospecting solution with enrichment, verification, and automation in one place, Derrick often reduces the need for separate tools, though individual tools may still be preferred for ultra-narrow email-first workflows.
One-on-one
hunter vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how hunter compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → One-on-onewoodpecker vs Derrick - solo duel
Drop the third-party context and see how woodpecker compares to Derrick alone.
Open the head-to-head → Curated stackAll B2B sales tools we reviewed in depth
Step back from the duel - see our hand-picked sales-tool selection and how every category fits together.
See the full curation → Keep Exploring
